MDYV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past month, showing positive momentum in its mid-cap value strategy.
Leading Holdings Showing Strength
Several of the largest positions, including companies in industrials, materials, and technology distribution, have posted strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee helps investors keep more of the returns generated by its portfolio.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited international diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Tilts Toward Financials and Industrials
Large weights in financial and industrial stocks mean the fund could be more affected if these sectors face a downturn.
Mid-Cap Value Style Risk
Because the ETF focuses on mid-sized value companies, it may lag the market when growth stocks or large-cap names are leading.
MDYV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.60B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.15%
Beta0.85
IssuerSPDR
Inception DateNov 08, 2005
Dividend Yield1.74%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P Mid Cap 400 Value
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume67,513
30 Day Avg. Volume82,689
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
103.13Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering303
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
MDYV Summary
MDYV is the SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF, which follows the S&P Mid Cap 400 Value index. It invests mainly in medium‑sized U.S. companies that appear relatively cheap based on their finances. The fund spreads money across many sectors, including financials, industrials, and consumer companies, with holdings like US Foods Holding and Alcoa. Someone might consider MDYV to add diversification and a balance of growth potential and stability to a stock portfolio. A key risk is that mid‑cap value stocks can still be volatile and can go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for ETFs because it is passively managed, tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Value Index rather than relying on active stock picking.
What would affect this ETF?The SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., as mid-cap companies often thrive during periods of expansion and increased consumer spending, particularly in sectors like financials and industrials, which have significant weight in the fund. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors such as real estate and consumer cyclical, while regulatory changes in industries like financials or energy may also pose risks. The ETF’s focus on undervalued companies provides potential for long-term gains if these stocks realize their intrinsic value, but short-term volatility may occur due to market sentiment or sector-specific challenges.
MDYV Top 10 Holdings
MDYV leans heavily into U.S. mid-cap value names, with financials and industrials steering the ship and a supporting cast in consumer and real estate. Recent strength from TD SYNNEX, Watsco, and Wesco has given the fund a solid push, as these rising industrial and tech-distribution plays help power returns. Materials exposure via Alcoa and Reliance Steel is also adding some spark. On the softer side, Annaly Capital and Pinnacle Financial look more mixed, occasionally tapping the brakes on an otherwise steadily climbing, domestically focused portfolio.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Foods Holding | 1.23% | $31.73M | $20.53B | 40.50% | 74 Outperform | |
| Reliance Steel | 1.10% | $28.39M | $17.97B | 25.61% | 74 Outperform | |
| Alcoa | 1.02% | $26.39M | $17.42B | 163.54% | 76 Outperform | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 1.02% | $26.37M | $18.31B | 103.85% | 73 Outperform | |
| Annaly Capital | 0.98% | $25.23M | $16.34B | 17.19% | 63 Neutral | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 0.96% | $24.67M | $15.86B | 50.63% | 79 Outperform | |
| Ovintiv | 0.93% | $23.89M | C$21.53B | 62.68% | 60 Neutral | |
| Wesco International | 0.92% | $23.80M | $15.41B | 94.62% | 75 Outperform | |
| Watsco | 0.92% | $23.76M | $17.91B | 0.24% | 71 Outperform | |
| Permian Resources | 0.91% | $23.43M | $17.77B | 66.50% | 81 Outperform |
MDYV Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
87.69
Positive
87.72
Positive
84.75
Positive
Market Momentum
1.18
Negative
62.17
Neutral
45.57
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MDYV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 89.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 87.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 84.75, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.18 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.17 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 45.57 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MDYV.
MDYV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
91.17
17.49
23.74%
IJJ
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
―
―
―
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
―
―
―
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents