Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GXPD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Holdings Performance
Several top holdings, like Tesla, TJX Companies, and Mercadolibre, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting the ETF's overall performance.
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a very low expense ratio, making it cost-effective compared to many other funds.
Focused Sector Exposure
The ETF's heavy focus on consumer cyclical stocks aligns with potential growth opportunities in this sector.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in Top Holdings
Amazon and Tesla make up over 50% of the portfolio, increasing risk if these companies face challenges.
Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has seen negative performance over the past month, which may concern investors looking for near-term gains.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With nearly all exposure in U.S. companies, the ETF lacks protection against risks in the domestic market.
GXPD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM15.13M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.15%
Beta1.39
IssuerGlobal X
Inception DateJul 22, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI USA / Consumer Discretionary -SEC
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,825
30 Day Avg. Volume38,713
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
30.06Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering50
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GXPD Summary
The Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) focuses on companies in the Consumer Discretionary sector, which includes businesses like retail, entertainment, and luxury goods. It tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary index and is weighted by market capitalization, meaning larger companies have a bigger impact on the fund. Some of its top holdings include Amazon and Tesla, making it appealing for those interested in high-growth companies tied to consumer spending trends. However, since it heavily relies on consumer-focused industries, its performance can fluctuate with economic cycles and changes in consumer behavior.
How much will it cost me?The Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for ETFs because it is passively managed, tracking an index rather than relying on active stock picking.
What would affect this ETF?The GXPD ETF, focused on the U.S. Consumer Discretionary sector, could benefit from strong economic growth and increased consumer spending, which often drive demand for non-essential goods and services. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which can reduce discretionary spending. Additionally, its heavy reliance on top holdings like Amazon and Tesla means the ETF's performance could be significantly impacted by company-specific events or broader trends in e-commerce and electric vehicles.
GXPD Top 10 Holdings
The GXPD ETF leans heavily on consumer discretionary giants like Amazon and Tesla, which together make up over half of its portfolio. Amazon’s mixed performance, with short-term weakness offsetting steady long-term gains, contrasts with Tesla’s rising momentum, driven by strong earnings and growth potential. Retail standout TJX Companies is a bright spot, delivering consistent gains thanks to robust revenue growth and strategic expansions. However, lagging names like Home Depot and Booking Holdings are holding the fund back, reflecting challenges in housing-related spending and travel demand. With nearly all holdings rooted in U.S. consumer cyclicals, the fund’s fortunes are closely tied to domestic spending trends.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | 34.45% | $5.21M | $2.43T | 1.08% | 71 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 21.64% | $3.27M | $1.60T | 14.28% | 73 Outperform | |
| Home Depot | 5.58% | $843.81K | $343.45B | -12.12% | 66 Neutral | |
| McDonald's | 3.60% | $544.04K | $224.93B | 7.91% | 65 Neutral | |
| TJX Companies | 2.77% | $419.57K | $171.68B | 26.72% | 79 Outperform | |
| Booking Holdings | 2.72% | $411.60K | $173.86B | 6.84% | 63 Neutral | |
| Lowe's | 2.18% | $329.95K | $134.88B | -2.94% | 69 Neutral | |
| Starbucks | 1.59% | $240.54K | $100.44B | 0.41% | 56 Neutral | |
| Mercadolibre | 1.40% | $212.16K | $101.27B | 16.12% | 77 Outperform | |
| DoorDash | 1.39% | $210.39K | $100.96B | 36.99% | 76 Outperform |
GXPD Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
26.25
Positive
26.03
Positive
Market Momentum
0.21
Negative
58.57
Neutral
73.92
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GXPD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.36, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.25, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.21 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 58.57 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 73.92 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GXPD.
GXPD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
26.95
2.08
8.36%
CVNY
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
―
―
―
IEDI
iShares Evolved US Discretionary Spending ETF
―
―
―
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
―
―
―
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
―
―
―
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents