tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FITZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FITZ

Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
FITZ, the Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its focus on high-quality leaders like Apple and Nvidia, which bring strong financial performance, growth potential in areas like AI and services, and generally positive outlooks. At the same time, holdings such as CrowdStrike and AbbVie introduce some drag due to valuation and profitability concerns, and several positions face cash flow, leverage, or technical risks. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share issues around high valuations and mixed technical signals, which could increase volatility if market sentiment shifts.
Positive Factors
Leading Technology Names
Top holdings like Nvidia, Apple, AMD, IonQ, and CrowdStrike have shown strong recent performance, helping support the fund despite overall weakness.
Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across technology, industrials, health care, energy, consumer stocks, financials, and real estate, which helps reduce the impact of trouble in any single sector.
Blue-Chip Stability
Holdings such as JPMorgan Chase, Apple, Walmart, and RTX add a base of well-established companies that can help steady the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of your returns are eaten up by fees over time.
Recent Negative Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date performance has been weak, indicating that the current mix of holdings has not kept up with the broader market recently.
Concentration in U.S. Technology
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward technology, the fund is sensitive to downturns in the U.S. tech sector and offers little geographic diversification.

FITZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FITZ Summary

The Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) is an actively managed fund that focuses on five big long-term themes: digital technology, defense and security, new tech spreading into more industries, modern delivery and logistics, and companies benefiting from major economic shifts. It mainly holds U.S. stocks across many sectors, with well-known names like Apple, Nvidia, JPMorgan Chase, Tesla, and Walmart. Someone might invest in FITZ to seek long-term growth from powerful trends while getting diversification across different industries. A key risk is that the fund is concentrated and theme-focused, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay about $7.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and uses research-driven stock picking rather than simply tracking a broad market index.
What would affect this ETF?Because FITZ is heavily invested in technology, defense, and industrial companies around the world, it could benefit from long-term growth in areas like artificial intelligence, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and increased government spending on defense and supply chain reshoring. On the other hand, its concentrated positions in big names like Nvidia, Apple, Tesla, and JPMorgan mean it could be hurt by higher interest rates, tighter regulations on tech or defense, economic slowdowns that reduce consumer and business spending, or setbacks in these specific companies.

FITZ Top 10 Holdings

FITZ is leaning hard into Big Tech and defense, with Apple, AMD, and Nvidia acting as the main engines under the hood. Apple has been steadily rising, while AMD has been on a strong run, giving the fund plenty of momentum on the digitalization and AI front. Nvidia’s performance has been more mixed lately, adding some bumpiness. On the defense side, Lockheed Martin and RTX are climbing, reinforcing the fund’s security theme. With names like JPMorgan and Eli Lilly also in the mix, FITZ offers a global, tech‑heavy portfolio anchored by a few powerful U.S. champions.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Palantir Technologies6.20%$5.30M$413.36B-4.08%
74
Outperform
Nvidia5.62%$4.80M$5.42T19.49%
76
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase5.48%$4.68M$950.35B24.25%
72
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings5.04%$4.31M$218.34B111.20%
67
Neutral
Apple5.04%$4.30M$4.57T35.69%
79
Outperform
RTX4.57%$3.91M$300.59B44.78%
74
Outperform
Tesla4.36%$3.73M$1.30T-2.40%
73
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co4.18%$3.57M$1.12T93.94%
72
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices4.17%$3.56M$789.07B172.56%
73
Outperform
Microsoft4.12%$3.52M$3.71T-3.01%
79
Outperform

FITZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
24.48
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.36
Negative
RSI
69.45
Neutral
STOCH
94.77
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FITZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 24.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 24.48, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.36 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.45 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.77 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FITZ.

FITZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$86.80M0.75%
72
Outperform
$97.76M0.50%
60
Neutral
$91.74M0.50%
68
Neutral
$82.17M0.90%
64
Neutral
$51.47M1.00%
56
Neutral
$44.11M0.75%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
25.85
0.46
1.81%
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement