tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

DARP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

DARP

Grizzle Growth Etf (DARP)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) has a solid overall rating, mainly because it is anchored by high-quality growth names like Alphabet and Arista Networks, which benefit from strong financial performance and powerful long-term trends in AI and cloud computing. Other major holdings such as Nvidia, Micron, and Vertiv also support the rating with strong earnings and AI-related growth drivers, though their high valuations and some regional or technical challenges add risk. Weaker spots like Coherent and GE Vernova, which face valuation and cash flow pressures, along with the fund’s heavy tilt toward a concentrated group of tech and AI-focused companies, are the main factors that hold the rating back and increase volatility risk.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Growth-Oriented Top Holdings
Several major positions like Micron, Kinross Gold, Vertiv, and Coherent have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification Within Growth Theme
Although tilted toward technology and communication services, the fund also holds industrials, materials, consumer cyclical, energy, and utilities, spreading growth exposure across multiple industries.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Concentration in a Few Growth Names
A significant portion of the portfolio is tied up in a small number of large growth stocks like Alphabet, Nvidia, and Micron, increasing the impact if any of these companies struggle.
Heavy U.S. Market Exposure
With the vast majority of assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF is highly sensitive to movements in the U.S. market and offers limited geographic diversification.

DARP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

DARP Summary

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is a thematic fund that looks for companies tied to big long-term trends instead of tracking a standard index. It focuses mainly on U.S. stocks in areas like technology and communication services, with top holdings including well-known names such as Alphabet (Google) and Nvidia, plus other growth-focused industrial and energy companies. Someone might invest in DARP to seek higher growth by betting on future-focused themes like tech innovation and new energy. A key risk is that these growth and tech-heavy stocks can be very volatile and may fall sharply in market downturns.
How much will it cost me?The Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on emerging market trends and innovative themes, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) could benefit from continued advancements in technology and sustainable energy, as these sectors are heavily represented in its portfolio and align with global trends toward innovation and environmental solutions. However, potential risks include regulatory changes affecting tech giants like Nvidia and Alphabet, or economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and industrial growth. Global exposure also means the ETF is sensitive to geopolitical tensions and currency fluctuations.

DARP Top 10 Holdings

DARP is leaning hard into global tech and AI, with Alphabet in the driver’s seat as a rising heavyweight thanks to its momentum in cloud and AI. Micron and Kinross Gold are surprise powerhouses, both climbing sharply and giving the fund an extra boost from chips and commodities. Vertiv and GE Vernova add an industrial and clean-energy twist, also trending positively. On the flip side, Nvidia looks more mixed lately and Arista Networks is losing steam, showing that not every high-flyer in this tech-heavy lineup is pulling its weight.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A14.85%$2.80M$4.04T71.20%
85
Outperform
Nvidia9.77%$1.84M$4.58T54.83%
76
Outperform
Micron7.19%$1.35M$461.73B360.89%
79
Outperform
Vertiv Holdings6.11%$1.15M$72.34B75.41%
77
Outperform
Amazon4.27%$804.91K$2.62T2.50%
71
Outperform
Kinross Gold4.10%$771.79K$45.79B242.36%
81
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.3.94%$742.58K$187.94B101.44%
69
Neutral
Arista Networks3.71%$699.63K$184.72B39.23%
83
Outperform
Coherent Corp3.37%$634.02K$33.63B150.06%
66
Neutral
Ciena3.01%$567.57K$34.86B216.25%
70
Outperform

DARP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
45.71
Positive
100DMA
43.91
Positive
200DMA
38.94
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.45
Negative
RSI
75.14
Negative
STOCH
94.88
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DARP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 48.05, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.94, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.45 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 75.14 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.88 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DARP.

DARP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$19.20M0.75%
$96.31M1.00%
$87.49M0.75%
$70.20M0.75%
$47.11M1.00%
$29.58M0.55%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
51.12
17.65
52.73%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement