Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
NBDS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Disruptive Companies
The ETF holds several well-known innovators in areas like semiconductors, e-commerce, and software, giving investors targeted access to companies driving technological change.
Focused Growth Sectors
A large allocation to technology and other growth-oriented sectors positions the fund to benefit if disruptive businesses regain strong momentum.
Select Strong-Performing Holdings
Some top positions, such as Nova, AMD, and ASML, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping to offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
The largest positions each take up a meaningful share of the fund, increasing the impact that any single stock’s weakness can have on overall returns.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has delivered weak returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, reflecting pressure on many of its disruptive growth holdings.
Heavy U.S. and Technology Exposure
With most assets in U.S. stocks and a majority in the technology sector, the fund is vulnerable to downturns in the U.S. growth and tech markets.
NBDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM26.60M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.55%
Beta1.53
IssuerNeuberger Berman
Inception DateApr 06, 2022
Dividend Yield0.43%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,177
30 Day Avg. Volume2,698
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
42.91Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering32
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
NBDS Summary
The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is a U.S.-focused fund that invests in companies leading major changes in technology and other industries, rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds many innovative businesses, with a strong tilt toward tech, including well-known names like Nvidia and Amazon. Someone might consider this ETF if they want growth potential from companies driving trends such as artificial intelligence, digital services, and new business models, while still getting some diversification across sectors. A key risk is that it is heavily exposed to fast-moving, often volatile tech and growth stocks, so its price can swing a lot.
How much will it cost me?The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) has an expense ratio of 0.55%, meaning you’ll pay $5.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, focusing on innovative companies and industries that require more research and expertise to select.
What would affect this ETF?The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) could benefit from continued advancements in technology and innovation, particularly in sectors like artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and biotechnology, where its holdings like Nvidia and Snowflake are well-positioned. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory changes in the technology and financial sectors. Additionally, global economic uncertainty could affect the performance of its diverse portfolio.
NBDS Top 10 Holdings
NBDS is leaning hard into global tech disruptors, with semiconductor names like Nova and ASML doing the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising and set the tone for the fund. AMD and Amazon are more steady contributors, helping to smooth out the ride. On the flip side, high-profile innovators like Robinhood, Spotify, Snowflake, and Shopify have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on returns. With a clear tilt toward technology and mostly non-defensive growth stories, this ETF lives and dies by the fortunes of cutting-edge, globally focused names.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 8.69% | $2.31M | $4.44T | 31.66% | 76 Outperform | |
| Nova | 6.42% | $1.71M | $13.54B | 65.60% | 81 Outperform | |
| Intuitive Surgical | 4.86% | $1.29M | $172.54B | -18.42% | 78 Outperform | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 4.69% | $1.25M | $338.02B | 83.31% | 73 Outperform | |
| ASML Holding | 4.39% | $1.17M | $539.58B | 87.16% | 81 Outperform | |
| Monolithic Power | 4.28% | $1.14M | $56.12B | 71.03% | 75 Outperform | |
| ARM Holdings PLC ADR | 3.96% | $1.05M | $133.05B | -21.47% | 69 Neutral | |
| Snowflake | 3.73% | $991.47K | $62.38B | -2.83% | 54 Neutral | |
| HEICO | 3.68% | $980.09K | $39.65B | 50.56% | 77 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.58% | $952.69K | $2.13T | -13.07% | 71 Outperform |
NBDS Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
35.09
Negative
35.74
Negative
34.33
Negative
Market Momentum
-1.15
Positive
33.44
Neutral
31.03
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NBDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.09, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.33, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -1.15 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.44 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 31.03 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NBDS.
NBDS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
31.51
-1.17
-3.58%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
―
―
―
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
―
―
―
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
―
―
―
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents