tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

NBDS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NBDS

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
NBDS, the Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it holds generally solid, but not flawless, long-term potential. Its score is helped by strong, innovation-focused holdings like Nvidia, Nova, Shopify, AMD, and Amazon, which all show robust financial performance and strategic positioning in high-growth areas such as AI, semiconductors, and e-commerce. However, names like Snowflake, Spotify, and Robinhood introduce more risk due to profitability, valuation, and technical concerns, and the fund’s heavy tilt toward tech and disruptive growth sectors is the main risk factor, as it can lead to higher volatility.
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Disruptive Companies
The ETF holds several well-known innovators in areas like semiconductors, e-commerce, and software, giving investors targeted access to companies driving technological change.
Focused Growth Sectors
A large allocation to technology and other growth-oriented sectors positions the fund to benefit if disruptive businesses regain strong momentum.
Select Strong-Performing Holdings
Some top positions, such as Nova, AMD, and ASML, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping to offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
The largest positions each take up a meaningful share of the fund, increasing the impact that any single stock’s weakness can have on overall returns.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has delivered weak returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, reflecting pressure on many of its disruptive growth holdings.
Heavy U.S. and Technology Exposure
With most assets in U.S. stocks and a majority in the technology sector, the fund is vulnerable to downturns in the U.S. growth and tech markets.

NBDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NBDS Summary

The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is a U.S.-focused fund that invests in companies leading major changes in technology and other industries, rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds many innovative businesses, with a strong tilt toward tech, including well-known names like Nvidia and Amazon. Someone might consider this ETF if they want growth potential from companies driving trends such as artificial intelligence, digital services, and new business models, while still getting some diversification across sectors. A key risk is that it is heavily exposed to fast-moving, often volatile tech and growth stocks, so its price can swing a lot.
How much will it cost me?The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) has an expense ratio of 0.55%, meaning you’ll pay $5.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, focusing on innovative companies and industries that require more research and expertise to select.
What would affect this ETF?The Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) could benefit from continued advancements in technology and innovation, particularly in sectors like artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and biotechnology, where its holdings like Nvidia and Snowflake are well-positioned. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory changes in the technology and financial sectors. Additionally, global economic uncertainty could affect the performance of its diverse portfolio.

NBDS Top 10 Holdings

NBDS is leaning hard into global tech disruptors, with semiconductor names like Nova and ASML doing the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising and set the tone for the fund. AMD and Amazon are more steady contributors, helping to smooth out the ride. On the flip side, high-profile innovators like Robinhood, Spotify, Snowflake, and Shopify have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake on returns. With a clear tilt toward technology and mostly non-defensive growth stories, this ETF lives and dies by the fortunes of cutting-edge, globally focused names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia7.58%$2.24M$4.58T54.83%
76
Outperform
Nova6.28%$1.86M$14.56B109.65%
81
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices5.00%$1.48M$410.32B115.37%
73
Outperform
Intuitive Surgical4.69%$1.39M$186.12B-8.85%
78
Outperform
Robinhood4.18%$1.24M$94.63B102.15%
68
Neutral
Spotify4.06%$1.20M$105.36B-5.59%
66
Neutral
Snowflake3.98%$1.18M$72.80B18.11%
54
Neutral
ASML Holding3.85%$1.14M$556.12B99.67%
81
Outperform
Amazon3.74%$1.10M$2.62T2.50%
71
Outperform
Monolithic Power3.46%$1.02M$52.48B87.76%
75
Outperform

NBDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.71
Negative
100DMA
36.12
Negative
200DMA
34.00
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.18
Positive
RSI
37.05
Neutral
STOCH
39.73
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NBDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.88, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.00, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.05 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 39.73 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NBDS.

NBDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$29.58M0.55%
$96.31M1.00%
$87.49M0.75%
$70.20M0.75%
$47.11M1.00%
$18.84M0.75%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
34.83
3.20
10.12%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement