FEMD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF (FEMD)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Several of the largest positions, especially in technology and industrial names, have shown strong gains so far this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, technology, financials, energy, health care, and consumer-related areas, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Positive Year-to-Date Return
The ETF has delivered a positive return so far this year, indicating that its mid-cap stock selection has generally been working in investors’ favor.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the gross return is eaten up by fees each year.
Very Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of money, which can increase the risk of low trading volume and potentially wider bid-ask spreads for investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With nearly all of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the performance of the U.S. market.
FEMD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM3.96M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.55%
Beta0.72
IssuerFirst Eagle
Inception DateJan 27, 2026
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,039
30 Day Avg. Volume1,788
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
42.96Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering68
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FEMD Summary
FEMD (First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF) is an actively managed fund that focuses on U.S. mid-sized companies, rather than tracking a fixed index. It invests across many sectors, including industrials, technology, and energy, aiming for long-term growth from businesses that are still expanding but more established than small startups. Well-known holdings include United Rentals and Canadian Pacific Kansas City. Investors might consider FEMD to add diversification beyond large, mega-cap names and to tap into the growth potential of mid-cap stocks. A key risk is that mid-cap shares can be more volatile and can go up and down sharply with the stock market.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.55%, which means you’ll pay about $5.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average low-cost index ETF because this fund is actively managed, paying a team to research and select mid-cap stocks rather than just tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?This U.S. mid-cap ETF could benefit if the economy grows steadily, since many of its industrial and technology holdings tend to do well when businesses invest more and demand for equipment, software, and energy rises, giving active managers more chances to pick winners. On the downside, a weaker U.S. economy, higher interest rates, or tighter regulations on energy, financials, or industrial companies could hurt mid-sized firms more than large ones and weigh on this concentrated, actively managed portfolio.
FEMD Top 10 Holdings
FEMD is leaning hard into U.S. mid-cap industrials and tech, with names like Flex and Onto Innovation doing much of the heavy lifting as their momentum and upbeat earnings keep the fund’s engine humming. Semiconductor-linked plays such as Silicon Motion and TTM Technologies are also rising, reinforcing a clear tilt toward the electronics and manufacturing supply chain. Not everything is firing, though: Ultra Clean Holdings looks mixed and Louisiana-Pacific is losing steam, modestly tugging on returns. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, sector-focused bet on mid-cap industrial and tech resilience.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Targa Resources | 2.19% | $87.44K | $60.72B | 72.90% | 74 Outperform | |
| Permian Resources | 2.16% | $86.12K | $16.92B | 52.87% | 81 Outperform | |
| Tenet Healthcare | 2.15% | $85.86K | $16.79B | 11.60% | 74 Outperform | |
| Louisiana-Pacific | 2.06% | $82.18K | $5.17B | -14.05% | 68 Neutral | |
| Ryman | 2.01% | $80.26K | $7.99B | 28.08% | 66 Neutral | |
| Performance Food Group | 1.97% | $78.54K | $17.56B | 10.47% | 65 Neutral | |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | 1.95% | $77.95K | $82.84B | 18.27% | 74 Outperform | |
| Steris | 1.95% | $77.84K | $21.23B | -3.67% | 77 Outperform | |
| Colliers International Group | 1.93% | $76.96K | $5.18B | -28.64% | 63 Neutral | |
| Oneok | 1.91% | $76.17K | $58.92B | 16.40% | 82 Outperform |
FEMD Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
36.46
Negative
35.63
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.22
Positive
41.17
Neutral
23.98
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FEMD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.85, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.22 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 41.17 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 23.98 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FEMD.
FEMD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FEMD
First Eagle Mid Cap Equity ETF
35.68
0.78
2.23%
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
MCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
―
―
―
EPMB
Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
SMCP
SMART Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents