Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
FDFF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Global Financial Exposure
The fund invests in financial companies across several countries, which can help spread risk beyond a single market.
Blend of Traditional and Innovative Finance
Holdings include both established financial giants and newer, more disruptive finance and payments firms, offering a mix of stability and growth potential.
Moderate Fund Size with Focused Strategy
The fund’s assets under management are large enough to be viable but still small enough to allow a targeted approach to disruptive finance themes.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Financial Sector
With most assets in financial stocks, the ETF is highly sensitive to downturns in the finance industry.
Several Weak Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, including major payment and financial firms, have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
FDFF Historical Chart
AUM48.18M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.50%
Beta0.98
IssuerFidelity
Inception DateJun 12, 2023
Dividend Yield0.88%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,161
30 Day Avg. Volume4,216
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
44.43Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering45
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FDFF Summary
The Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) focuses on the fast‑changing world of financial technology instead of tracking a traditional market index. It invests in companies involved in digital payments, online banking, and modern financial services. Well-known holdings include Mastercard and Visa, along with other firms using technology to reshape how people pay, borrow, and invest. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth from the shift toward digital finance and to get exposure to many fintech companies in one fund. A key risk is that fintech stocks can be volatile and may rise or fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) has an expense ratio of 0.50%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on innovative and niche FinTech companies that require more research and expertise. It’s designed for investors looking to capitalize on the growth of disruptive financial technologies.
What would affect this ETF?The Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF) could benefit from the growing adoption of digital payments, blockchain technology, and financial software solutions as global financial services continue to embrace innovation. However, potential risks include regulatory changes targeting FinTech companies and economic downturns that may impact consumer spending or investment in technology. Additionally, competition within the FinTech sector and challenges faced by top holdings like Visa and Mastercard could influence the ETF's performance.
FDFF Top 10 Holdings
FDFF is essentially a bet on disruptive finance, with a heavy tilt toward payments giants and innovative banks across the U.S., Europe, and Asia. DBS Group, Bankinter, and FinecoBank are doing the heavy lifting lately, with their shares rising and adding some global flavor beyond the U.S. core. On the flip side, Mastercard and Visa have been losing steam, while Capital One, Apollo, and Block are lagging and acting as a brake on returns. Overall, the fund is concentrated in financials with a strong FinTech and digital-payments heartbeat.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital One Financial | 6.02% | $2.89M | $139.18B | 7.47% | 71 Outperform | |
| BlackRock | 5.68% | $2.72M | $182.54B | 4.86% | 77 Outperform | |
| DBS Group Holdings | 4.91% | $2.35M | S$167.88B | 56.55% | 78 Outperform | |
| Apollo Global Management | 4.44% | $2.13M | $78.09B | -21.70% | 75 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 4.36% | $2.09M | $483.97B | -3.00% | 75 Outperform | |
| Adyen | 4.33% | $2.08M | €39.53B | -11.80% | 66 Neutral | |
| Bankinter | 4.32% | $2.07M | €12.96B | 72.81% | 75 Outperform | |
| FinecoBank SpA | 4.31% | $2.07M | €13.67B | 21.02% | 71 Outperform | |
| Block | 4.29% | $2.06M | $36.72B | -31.50% | 72 Outperform | |
| Visa | 4.18% | $2.01M | $615.41B | -5.84% | 70 Outperform |
FDFF Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
35.47
Negative
35.71
Negative
36.37
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.05
Positive
36.59
Neutral
9.34
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDFF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.16, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.47, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.37, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.05 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.34 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FDFF.
FDFF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FDFF
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
34.95
-3.96
-10.18%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
―
―
―
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
―
―
―
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents