tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

EPSB - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EPSB

Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
EPSB, the Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF, appears to be a solid, well-rounded fund, supported by strong contributors like Woodward (WWD), Archrock (AROC), GATX (GATX), and Snap-on (SNA), all of which show healthy financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends. Some holdings, such as FormFactor (FORM) and CBRE (CBRE), add growth potential but come with valuation concerns and areas of weaker financial performance, which likely prevent the fund from ranking even higher. The main risk factor is that several key holdings show high or demanding valuations and, in some cases, signs of overbought or bearish technical conditions, which could increase volatility if market sentiment turns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, including names like Formfactor, Huntington Ingalls, and Moog, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across many sectors such as industrials, technology, financials, health care, and others help reduce the impact if any single industry struggles.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Small Asset Base
With a modest amount of money invested in the fund, investors may face higher trading spreads and a greater risk the ETF could be closed if it does not grow.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.

EPSB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EPSB Summary

Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) is an actively managed fund that focuses on small- and mid-sized U.S. companies, rather than tracking a set index. It spreads investments across many areas of the economy, including industrials, technology, and financials. Well-known holdings include Raymond James Financial and CBRE Group. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and diversify beyond large, well-known blue-chip stocks, gaining exposure to smaller companies that may grow faster. A key risk is that smaller company stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) has an expense ratio of 0.88%, meaning you’ll pay $8.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to select and monitor its portfolio of small- and mid-cap companies.
What would affect this ETF?The Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB), with its focus on small- and mid-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that disproportionately affect these agile but less established firms. Regulatory changes or shifts in consumer demand could also impact key sectors like financials and consumer cyclical industries.

EPSB Top 10 Holdings

EPSB is leaning hard into U.S. industrial and defense names, with Woodward, Huntington Ingalls, and Moog acting as the main engines of performance thanks to steadily rising share prices and upbeat earnings stories. Tech exposure is more selective, but FormFactor has been a standout, surging recently and giving the fund a growthy spark. On the steadier side, CBRE and Raymond James are more like ballast than rocket fuel, contributing modest gains without much drama. Overall, this is a domestically focused, industrial-heavy portfolio with a few tech high-flyers setting the tone.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Woodward4.29%$193.25K$23.42B103.23%
79
Outperform
Moog3.23%$145.31K$10.31B69.54%
73
Outperform
Teledyne Technologies2.96%$133.25K$30.82B29.07%
71
Outperform
Formfactor2.89%$130.27K$7.35B171.16%
68
Neutral
CBRE Group2.89%$129.94K$50.88B20.59%
70
Outperform
Huntington Ingalls2.79%$125.40K$15.93B141.89%
69
Neutral
Archrock2.71%$122.09K$5.67B15.00%
79
Outperform
Raymond James Financial2.55%$114.62K$34.23B6.58%
76
Outperform
Ryder System2.46%$110.67K$8.71B36.38%
73
Outperform
Reinsurance Group2.38%$107.03K$14.41B11.53%
74
Outperform

EPSB Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
23.62
Positive
100DMA
22.87
Positive
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.50
Negative
RSI
77.08
Negative
STOCH
88.97
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EPSB, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 24.70, equal to the 50-day MA of 23.62, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.50 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 77.08 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.97 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EPSB.

EPSB Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$4.50M0.88%
$74.08M0.69%
$54.89M0.75%
$45.02M0.38%
$30.16M0.80%
$28.75M1.09%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EPSB
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
25.73
5.87
29.56%
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
MYLD
Cambria Micro and SmallCap Shareholder Yield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement