Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
CSMD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and in the most recent month, showing positive momentum.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, especially in industrials and technology, have shown strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Diversified Sector Mix Within Growth Areas
Holdings spread across industrials, technology, health care, and consumer sectors help reduce the impact if any one growth industry weakens.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration in Industrials and Tech
A large share of the portfolio is in industrial and technology stocks, which can increase risk if these sectors face a downturn.
CSMD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM464.83M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.68%
Beta1.01
IssuerCongress
Inception DateAug 22, 2023
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume67,509
30 Day Avg. Volume83,965
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
38.77Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering43
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CSMD Summary
Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) is an actively managed fund that focuses on small- and mid-sized U.S. companies with strong growth potential, rather than tracking a specific index. It invests mainly in industrial, technology, and health care businesses, including names like Curtiss-Wright and CyberArk Software. Someone might consider CSMD to seek higher long-term growth and to diversify beyond the usual large, well-known stocks. However, because it concentrates on smaller growth companies in the U.S., its share price can be more volatile and may go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) has an expense ratio of 0.68%, meaning you’ll pay $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, with a team of professionals carefully selecting growth-focused small and mid-cap companies. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) could benefit from continued innovation and expansion in sectors like Technology and Industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if economic conditions worsen, as small and mid-cap companies are often more sensitive to interest rate hikes and market volatility. Additionally, sector-specific risks, such as regulatory changes in Health Care or shifts in consumer spending, could impact its performance.
CSMD Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is leaning hard into U.S. industrial and infrastructure names, with Comfort Systems, Curtiss-Wright, and Sterling Infrastructure doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on strong earnings and growth stories. nVent Electric and Valmont are also pulling in the right direction, though rich valuations mean the ride may not be perfectly smooth. On the flip side, Rambus and Karman Holdings have been more mixed lately, occasionally losing steam and trimming some upside. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, industrial-heavy growth play with a dash of tech and health care for balance.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort Systems | 6.59% | $30.68M | $48.32B | 319.79% | 80 Outperform | |
| Sterling Infrastructure | 6.28% | $29.24M | $12.40B | 243.42% | 71 Outperform | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 6.23% | $28.99M | $25.08B | 116.55% | 74 Outperform | |
| nVent Electric | 3.68% | $17.15M | $17.45B | 99.06% | 76 Outperform | |
| Karman Holdings Inc. | 3.30% | $15.34M | $13.10B | 221.99% | 62 Neutral | |
| Valmont | 3.21% | $14.95M | $8.21B | 31.57% | 71 Outperform | |
| Rambus | 2.87% | $13.33M | $9.68B | 72.82% | 78 Outperform | |
| Penumbra | 2.86% | $13.31M | $13.15B | 28.53% | 78 Outperform | |
| Carpenter Technology | 2.84% | $13.23M | $18.79B | 113.85% | 75 Outperform | |
| Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings | 2.78% | $12.94M | $12.93B | -8.56% | 71 Outperform |
CSMD Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
33.44
Negative
32.95
Negative
32.50
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.36
Positive
32.58
Neutral
25.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CSMD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.28, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.44, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.50, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.36 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 32.58 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 25.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for CSMD.
CSMD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CSMD
Congress SMid Growth ETF
31.53
3.76
13.54%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
―
―
―
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents