tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSMC

Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
RSMC, the Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF, has an overall rating that reflects a generally solid but not outstanding mix of small- and mid-cap stocks. Strong contributors like Badger Meter (BMI), with robust sales growth, profitability, and effective strategic initiatives, and Q2 Holdings (QTWO), which shows solid financial performance and bullish momentum, help support the fund’s quality. However, holdings such as StoneX Group (SNEX) and HASI, which face profitability, cash flow, and leverage challenges, along with some bearish or cautious technical signals across several names, introduce risk, especially given the fund’s focus on smaller U.S. companies.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Beneficial Sector Mix
Heavy exposure to industrials, financials, and technology provides access to areas of the market that can benefit from economic growth and innovation.
Several Strong Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, such as StoneX Group, PJT Partners, HASI, and Aaon, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Concentrated Sector Exposure
With most assets in industrials, financials, and technology, the fund is vulnerable if any of these sectors experience a downturn.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions like Badger Meter, Radnet, and Merit Medical Systems have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.

RSMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSMC Summary

The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) focuses on U.S. small and mid-sized companies, aiming to capture the growth of businesses that are not in the big, well-known large-cap indexes. It does not track a specific index, but targets the “extended market,” with holdings across industries like industrials, financials, and technology. Examples of companies it owns include BJ’s Wholesale Club and Badger Meter. Investors might consider RSMC for growth potential and added diversification beyond large caps. A key risk is that smaller companies can be more volatile, so the share price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and financial sector performance. Regulatory changes or shifts in market sentiment toward small and mid-cap stocks could also influence its future performance.

RSMC Top 10 Holdings

RSMC is leaning heavily into U.S. industrials and financials, and that’s where much of the action is. AAON has been a bright spot lately, helping to pull the fund higher, while PJT Partners, StoneX Group, and FirstCash add steady fuel from the financial side. On the other hand, Badger Meter, RadNet, and Merit Medical are losing steam, acting as mild brakes on performance. With all holdings in U.S. small and mid-caps and no single mega-name dominating, the story here is targeted sector tilts rather than stock-specific concentration.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
FirstCash4.04%$29.03M$7.52B56.21%
74
Outperform
StoneX Group3.97%$28.54M$5.88B53.75%
58
Neutral
Badger Meter3.73%$26.81M$4.32B-31.48%
78
Outperform
HASI3.55%$25.55M$4.34B22.85%
70
Outperform
Radnet3.49%$25.13M$5.42B7.07%
63
Neutral
Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings3.29%$23.68M$12.10B-6.67%
71
Outperform
PJT Partners3.21%$23.12M$8.41B4.88%
71
Outperform
Western Alliance2.90%$20.90M$9.81B1.46%
71
Outperform
RBC Bearings2.80%$20.12M$15.80B43.27%
77
Outperform
Nordson2.66%$19.10M$15.29B24.66%
79
Outperform

RSMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
25.93
Positive
100DMA
25.96
Positive
200DMA
25.68
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.12
Positive
RSI
44.40
Neutral
STOCH
8.65
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.93, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.68, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.12 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 44.40 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.65 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RSMC.

RSMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$719.32M0.75%
$905.77M0.65%
$721.11M0.57%
$360.38M0.75%
$209.89M0.65%
$187.37M0.56%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
25.99
-0.13
-0.50%
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement