Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RSMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as StoneX Group and FirstCash, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Industrials, Financials, and Technology, which helps reduce risk from sector-specific downturns.
Focused Small-Mid Cap Exposure
The fund targets U.S. small and mid-cap companies, offering investors access to growth opportunities in less mature businesses.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared to many other funds, which could eat into long-term returns.
Weak Recent Performance
The fund has experienced negative returns over the past month and modest gains over three months, indicating short-term challenges.
Overwhelming U.S. Exposure
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund lacks geographic diversification and is vulnerable to domestic market risks.
RSMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM729.38M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta0.89
IssuerRockefeller
Inception DateOct 10, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume46,291
30 Day Avg. Volume18,889
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
30.89Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering44
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSMC Summary
The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is an investment fund focused on small and mid-sized companies in the U.S., offering exposure to innovative businesses that are often overlooked in larger stock indices. It includes companies like BJ's Wholesale Club and FirstCash, which represent growing sectors such as consumer goods and financial services. Investors might consider RSMC for its potential to capture growth from emerging businesses and diversify their portfolios beyond large-cap stocks. However, new investors should be aware that smaller companies can be more volatile, meaning the ETF's value may fluctuate more significantly with market changes.
How much will it cost me?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and financial sector performance. Regulatory changes or shifts in market sentiment toward small and mid-cap stocks could also influence its future performance.
RSMC Top 10 Holdings
The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) leans heavily into industrials, financials, and technology, which together dominate its portfolio. FirstCash is a rising star, benefiting from strong revenue growth and strategic moves, while StoneX Group also adds momentum with solid earnings and acquisitions. On the flip side, Badger Meter and Q2 Holdings are lagging, with valuation concerns and mixed technical signals holding them back. The fund’s U.S.-focused, small-to-mid cap approach captures entrepreneurial energy, but its sector concentration means performance hinges on these key industries staying resilient.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Badger Meter | 4.37% | $31.87M | $5.13B | -16.15% | 78 Outperform | |
| FirstCash | 4.27% | $31.18M | $7.29B | 55.02% | 74 Outperform | |
| StoneX Group | 3.79% | $27.65M | $5.39B | 56.97% | 58 Neutral | |
| Radnet | 3.77% | $27.52M | $6.06B | 13.96% | 63 Neutral | |
| PJT Partners | 3.25% | $23.69M | $8.80B | 17.02% | 71 Outperform | |
| Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings | 3.19% | $23.27M | $11.80B | -6.58% | 71 Outperform | |
| Merit Medical Systems | 3.05% | $22.28M | $5.52B | -3.10% | 68 Neutral | |
| Western Alliance | 2.80% | $20.46M | $9.87B | 14.44% | 71 Outperform | |
| HASI | 2.76% | $20.16M | $4.13B | 21.48% | 70 Outperform | |
| Q2 Holdings | 2.73% | $19.89M | $4.37B | -21.43% | 75 Outperform |
RSMC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
25.60
Positive
25.91
Positive
25.41
Positive
Market Momentum
0.14
Negative
60.07
Neutral
89.35
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.83, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.60, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.41, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.14 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.35 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSMC.
RSMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
26.40
0.87
3.41%
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents