Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RSMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Beneficial Sector Mix
Heavy exposure to industrials, financials, and technology provides access to areas of the market that can benefit from economic growth and innovation.
Several Strong Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, such as StoneX Group, PJT Partners, HASI, and Aaon, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Concentrated Sector Exposure
With most assets in industrials, financials, and technology, the fund is vulnerable if any of these sectors experience a downturn.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions like Badger Meter, Radnet, and Merit Medical Systems have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.
RSMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM708.27M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta0.89
IssuerRockefeller
Inception DateOct 10, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume31,241
30 Day Avg. Volume24,623
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
31.61Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering44
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSMC Summary
The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) focuses on U.S. small and mid-sized companies, aiming to capture the growth of businesses that are not in the big, well-known large-cap indexes. It does not track a specific index, but targets the “extended market,” with holdings across industries like industrials, financials, and technology. Examples of companies it owns include BJ’s Wholesale Club and Badger Meter. Investors might consider RSMC for growth potential and added diversification beyond large caps. A key risk is that smaller companies can be more volatile, so the share price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and financial sector performance. Regulatory changes or shifts in market sentiment toward small and mid-cap stocks could also influence its future performance.
RSMC Top 10 Holdings
RSMC is leaning hard into U.S. industrials and financials, and a few names are clearly steering the ship. Esco Technologies and Nordson have been climbing steadily, giving the fund a solid industrial backbone, while InterDigital adds a rising tech angle. On the financial side, StoneX Group and FirstCash are pulling their weight, helping offset bumps elsewhere. Not everything is smooth sailing: Badger Meter and PJT Partners have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, small‑mid cap story with industrial and financial engines in the lead.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FirstCash | 4.51% | $31.90M | $8.37B | 64.88% | 74 Outperform | |
| StoneX Group | 4.31% | $30.49M | $5.67B | 41.00% | 58 Neutral | |
| Badger Meter | 3.84% | $27.19M | $4.34B | -29.81% | 78 Outperform | |
| HASI | 3.75% | $26.57M | $4.58B | 19.85% | 70 Outperform | |
| Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings | 3.66% | $25.90M | $12.67B | -16.19% | 71 Outperform | |
| Radnet | 3.36% | $23.76M | $4.71B | 20.61% | 63 Neutral | |
| InterDigital | 3.08% | $21.82M | $9.17B | 65.86% | 76 Outperform | |
| Esco Technologies | 2.78% | $19.65M | $6.90B | 65.04% | 70 Neutral | |
| PJT Partners | 2.74% | $19.41M | $3.48B | -3.45% | 71 Outperform | |
| UL Solutions Inc. Class A | 2.69% | $19.06M | $16.30B | 53.45% | 74 Outperform |
RSMC Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
26.31
Negative
25.98
Negative
25.94
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.15
Positive
35.38
Neutral
26.82
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.36, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.31, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.94, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 35.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 26.82 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSMC.
RSMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
25.16
2.15
9.34%
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents