RSMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Leading Holdings Showing Strong Momentum
Several of the largest positions, such as StoneX Group, TD SYNNEX, and Aaon, have posted strong year-to-date results, helping drive the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification Within the U.S.
Holdings spread across industrials, financials, technology, consumer, health care, and other sectors help reduce the impact if any single industry faces a downturn.
Negative Factors
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Short-Term Performance Weakness
The ETF has recently slipped over the past month, which may signal near-term volatility or a pause in its upward trend.
Concentrated in U.S. Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks
With almost all assets in U.S. companies and a focus on smaller and mid-sized firms, the fund is more exposed to domestic economic swings and can be more volatile than broader, more global funds.
RSMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM797.99M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta0.87
IssuerRockefeller
Inception DateOct 10, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume10,545
30 Day Avg. Volume10,082
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
35.75Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering47
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSMC Summary
The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) focuses on U.S. small and mid-sized companies, aiming to capture the growth of businesses that sit outside the big-name large caps. It doesn’t track a single index, but follows an “extended market” theme, spreading investments across many sectors like industrials, financials, and technology. Well-known holdings include TD SYNNEX and BJ’s Wholesale Club. Investors might consider RSMC for growth potential and diversification beyond the usual blue-chip stocks. However, small and mid-sized companies can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and financial sector performance. Regulatory changes or shifts in market sentiment toward small and mid-cap stocks could also influence its future performance.
RSMC Top 10 Holdings
RSMC leans heavily into U.S. industrials and financials, with names like AAON and Mueller Industries helping drive returns as their steady to rising momentum reflects solid business trends. StoneX Group and TD SYNNEX add a tech-enabled financial and IT flavor, both generally rising but with some recent choppiness that can nudge performance up or down. On the weaker side, RadNet has been lagging, and HASI has lost some steam despite earlier gains, acting as mild brakes on the portfolio. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, small‑mid cap story built around operationally strong, niche players.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HASI | 3.93% | $31.00M | $5.20B | 58.11% | 70 Outperform | |
| Radnet | 3.46% | $27.36M | $5.69B | 24.64% | 63 Neutral | |
| FirstCash | 3.29% | $26.01M | $8.78B | 53.07% | 74 Outperform | |
| InterDigital | 3.20% | $25.24M | $8.89B | 30.77% | 76 Outperform | |
| StoneX Group | 3.11% | $24.52M | $7.94B | 62.87% | 58 Neutral | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 3.02% | $23.85M | $20.18B | 74.25% | 73 Outperform | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 2.92% | $23.03M | $16.67B | 29.57% | 79 Outperform | |
| Korn Ferry | 2.81% | $22.17M | $4.28B | 18.49% | 73 Outperform | |
| Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings | 2.65% | $20.96M | $12.32B | -10.46% | 71 Outperform | |
| SEI Investments Company | 2.61% | $20.58M | $12.57B | 19.76% | 79 Outperform |
RSMC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
28.43
Positive
27.73
Positive
26.78
Positive
Market Momentum
0.35
Negative
64.80
Neutral
95.33
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.54, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.43, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.78, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.35 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.80 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.33 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSMC.
RSMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
29.55
3.61
13.92%
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
RNIN
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents