RSMC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past month, showing positive momentum in its strategy.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, including StoneX Group, TD SYNNEX, and Stride, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused but Varied Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across multiple sectors such as industrials, financials, technology, and consumer-related areas, which helps avoid relying on just one industry.
Negative Factors
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
Concentration in Top Holdings
The largest positions each take up a noticeable share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
U.S.-Only Geographic Exposure
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little diversification across different countries and economies.
RSMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM764.19M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta0.88
IssuerRockefeller
Inception DateOct 10, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume10,765
30 Day Avg. Volume12,785
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.04Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering44
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSMC Summary
The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) focuses on U.S. small and mid-sized companies, rather than the big household-name stocks in major indexes. It does not track a specific index, but targets the “extended market,” with a mix of industrial, financial, technology, and consumer businesses. Well-known names include BJ’s Wholesale Club and TD SYNNEX. Investors might consider RSMC for growth potential and added diversification beyond large caps. However, smaller companies can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, which typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending and financial sector performance. Regulatory changes or shifts in market sentiment toward small and mid-cap stocks could also influence its future performance.
RSMC Top 10 Holdings
RSMC is leaning heavily into U.S. industrials and financials, with names like Sterling Infrastructure and AAON doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep climbing. StoneX and TD SYNNEX add more fuel from the tech and financial side, both riding steady uptrends. On the flip side, BJ’s Wholesale and RadNet are losing steam, acting as small anchors on performance, while Casella Waste has been choppy. Overall, this is a U.S.-only, small- and mid-cap story, with a clear tilt toward economically sensitive, execution-driven businesses.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StoneX Group | 4.35% | $33.01M | $8.53B | 89.92% | 58 Neutral | |
| FirstCash | 4.25% | $32.27M | $9.17B | 65.34% | 74 Outperform | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 3.87% | $29.42M | $22.46B | 127.17% | 73 Outperform | |
| HASI | 3.76% | $28.57M | $5.20B | 59.79% | 70 Outperform | |
| Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings | 3.09% | $23.45M | $11.31B | -20.79% | 71 Outperform | |
| Korn Ferry | 2.77% | $21.00M | $3.70B | 2.68% | 73 Outperform | |
| Radnet | 2.76% | $20.99M | $4.27B | -7.48% | 63 Neutral | |
| DigitalOcean Holdings | 2.74% | $20.77M | $18.06B | 475.56% | 73 Outperform | |
| Aaon | 2.66% | $20.21M | $11.75B | 50.17% | 62 Neutral | |
| Casella Waste | 2.63% | $19.94M | $5.28B | -28.40% | 69 Neutral |
RSMC Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
27.15
Positive
26.58
Positive
26.25
Positive
Market Momentum
0.18
Positive
51.74
Neutral
69.60
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.92, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.15, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.25, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.74 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 69.60 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RSMC.
RSMC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
27.80
2.20
8.59%
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
―
―
―
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
MGMT
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents