AV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Corgi Aerospace & Commercial Aviation ETF (AV)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Aerospace and Defense Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as GE Aerospace, Howmet Aerospace, and FedEx, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Industry Exposure
The fund’s heavy tilt toward industrial and aerospace companies offers targeted exposure for investors who want to concentrate on this specific theme.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in the industrials sector, the ETF is vulnerable if aerospace and related industries face a downturn.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, providing little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as Northrop Grumman and Transdigm Group, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns if the trend continues.
AV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM872.57K
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.72
IssuerCorgi
Inception DateMay 06, 2026
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume529
30 Day Avg. Volume1,743
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
31.93Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering40
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
AV Summary
The Corgi Aerospace & Commercial Aviation ETF (AV) focuses on companies involved in building, operating, and servicing airplanes and aviation systems, mainly in the U.S. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but targets the aerospace and commercial aviation theme, holding well-known names like Boeing and GE Aerospace, along with delivery giants such as UPS and FedEx. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek growth from rising global air travel, newer aircraft, and ongoing maintenance needs across the aviation industry. However, this fund is concentrated in one sector, so its price can swing a lot with the economy, fuel costs, and travel demand.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay about $3.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the cost of many broad, passively managed index ETFs, mainly because this is a more specialized, actively managed fund focused on the aerospace and commercial aviation niche.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit from a continued recovery in global air travel, airlines upgrading their fleets, and higher spending on aircraft, engines, and related services, which would support many of its industrial and aerospace holdings like GE Aerospace, Boeing, and major defense contractors. On the downside, it is heavily tied to the cyclical Industrials sector, so a global slowdown, higher interest rates, fuel cost spikes, supply-chain disruptions, or new safety and environmental regulations could hurt aircraft demand and shipping companies such as UPS and FedEx, weighing on overall performance.
AV Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is tightly focused on the global aerospace and commercial aviation ecosystem, with U.S. industrial heavyweights steering returns. GE Aerospace and RTX are doing much of the lifting, with steady-to-rising performance that reflects strong backlogs and aviation demand. Howmet Aerospace and Delta Air Lines add extra thrust, both showing solid momentum as travel and fleet upgrades pick up. On the flip side, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing are losing a bit of altitude, their recent weakness tempering gains and underscoring the fund’s reliance on a concentrated cluster of big aerospace names.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Aerospace | 11.16% | $95.06K | $373.60B | 33.56% | 72 Outperform | |
| RTX | 10.00% | $85.23K | $290.06B | 37.66% | 74 Outperform | |
| General Dynamics | 5.40% | $46.01K | $103.74B | 22.27% | 80 Outperform | |
| Howmet Aerospace | 5.17% | $44.03K | $112.93B | 58.06% | 67 Neutral | |
| Lockheed Martin | 4.93% | $41.96K | $134.49B | 38.37% | 70 Outperform | |
| Northrop Grumman | 4.20% | $35.80K | $77.07B | -7.00% | 76 Outperform | |
| Boeing | 3.96% | $33.72K | $170.83B | 5.01% | 54 Neutral | |
| United Parcel | 3.82% | $32.52K | $88.59B | 25.70% | 72 Outperform | |
| Delta Air Lines | 3.70% | $31.48K | $57.50B | 74.39% | 80 Outperform | |
| Transdigm Group | 3.53% | $30.11K | $70.16B | -20.10% | 69 Neutral |
AV Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
28.02
Positive
Market Momentum
0.26
Negative
64.48
Neutral
86.21
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.02, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.48 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 86.21 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for AV.
AV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
AV
Corgi Aerospace & Commercial Aviation ETF
29.57
3.24
12.31%
GASZ
Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF
―
―
―
JOUL
Corgi High Voltage Grid Equipment ETF
―
―
―
BZZ
Corgi Drones & Urban Air Mobility ETF
―
―
―
DOCK
Corgi Ports, Rail & Freight ETF
―
―
―
HULL
Corgi Shipping & Global Logistics ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents