tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

AFMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

AFMC

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
AFMC, the First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong mid-cap holdings like Woodward, Renaissancere Holdings, and Exelixis, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and supportive technical trends. These strengths are partly offset by names such as Casey's General Stores and BorgWarner, where signs of overvaluation and bearish or weak technical momentum weigh on the fund. A key risk factor is that several top holdings show potential overbought conditions or high valuation metrics, which could increase volatility if market sentiment shifts.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Mostly Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Mueller Industries, Comfort Systems, Oshkosh, and Curtiss-Wright, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees.
Some Weak Top Holdings
A few key positions, such as Exelixis and Old Republic International, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.

AFMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AFMC Summary

The First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) is an actively managed fund that focuses on mid-sized U.S. companies, aiming to blend growth potential with some stability. It doesn’t track a fixed index, but instead selects stocks using a rules-based approach. The fund spreads investments across many sectors, including industrials, technology, and financials, and holds companies like BorgWarner and Oshkosh. Someone might invest in AFMC to diversify beyond large, well-known stocks and tap into the growth of mid-cap firms. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) has an expense ratio of 0.65%, meaning you’ll pay $6.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, which involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) could benefit from economic growth in the U.S., as mid-cap companies often thrive during periods of expansion and innovation, particularly in sectors like Technology and Industrials, which have significant weight in the fund. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact mid-cap stocks, especially in sectors like Financials and Consumer Cyclical, which are sensitive to borrowing costs and consumer spending. Regulatory changes or disruptions in key industries could also influence the performance of top holdings such as Flex and United Therapeutics.

AFMC Top 10 Holdings

AFMC’s story right now is all about solid, U.S.-focused mid-caps with an industrial backbone. Comfort Systems and Woodward have been doing the heavy lifting, with rising momentum that helps pull the fund higher, while Lumentum’s surge on AI and cloud optimism adds a tech-powered boost. Oshkosh and BorgWarner are also contributing steadily, reflecting strength in industrial and auto-related names. On the flip side, Mueller Industries and Exelixis are more mixed to lagging, occasionally tapping the brakes on an otherwise broadly constructive, industrial-tilted portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
TechnipFMC1.37%$1.88M$25.38B150.79%
80
Outperform
Mueller Industries1.31%$1.80M$12.70B41.56%
78
Outperform
Casey's General1.27%$1.74M$24.63B74.11%
68
Neutral
BorgWarner1.21%$1.66M$11.03B78.39%
65
Neutral
Federated Hermes1.16%$1.59M$4.20B42.89%
72
Outperform
Renaissancere Holdings1.10%$1.50M$12.90B22.86%
78
Outperform
Curtiss-Wright1.10%$1.50M$26.05B131.76%
74
Outperform
Exelixis1.08%$1.48M$11.00B8.21%
78
Outperform
National Fuel Gas Company1.07%$1.46M$8.83B25.02%
77
Outperform
Woodward1.06%$1.45M$22.93B121.98%
79
Outperform

AFMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
36.47
Negative
100DMA
35.20
Positive
200DMA
33.92
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.08
Positive
RSI
39.37
Neutral
STOCH
29.34
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AFMC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.47, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.92, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.08 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.37 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.34 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for AFMC.

AFMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$135.05M0.68%
72
Outperform
$496.22M0.20%
72
Outperform
$307.29M0.18%
71
Outperform
$292.99M0.55%
67
Neutral
$142.13M0.80%
75
Outperform
$106.25M0.52%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
AFMC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
35.92
6.04
20.21%
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
TMVE
Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
AMID
Argent Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement