GLRY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings with Solid Momentum
Several of the largest positions, such as KLA, BWX Technologies, Curtiss-Wright, and Monolithic Power, have delivered strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, industrials, consumer, financials, and others, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the return is eaten up by fees each year.
Concentration in Top Holdings
A meaningful share of the portfolio is tied up in a small group of stocks, so weakness in just a few names could noticeably affect performance.
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly sensitive to the U.S. market.
GLRY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM154.60M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.80%
Beta1.00
IssuerInspire
Inception DateDec 07, 2020
Dividend Yield0.24%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume23,249
30 Day Avg. Volume22,437
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
45.08Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering33
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GLRY Summary
GLRY is an actively managed ETF that invests in U.S. mid-sized companies with strong price momentum and high ESG (environmental, social, and governance) standards, rather than tracking a set index. It spreads money across many sectors, with a tilt toward technology and industrials. Well-known holdings include Broadcom and KLA. Someone might consider GLRY if they want growth potential from mid-cap stocks while also supporting companies that meet certain ethical and sustainability screens. A key risk is that mid-cap and momentum stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on mid-cap companies with strong ESG credentials and momentum, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?GLRY's focus on mid-cap companies with strong ESG credentials positions it to benefit from increasing investor demand for sustainable and socially responsible investments, as well as potential growth in sectors like technology and industrials, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, the ETF could face challenges from economic slowdowns or rising interest rates, which may negatively impact mid-cap companies and sectors like consumer cyclical and financials. Regulatory changes affecting ESG standards or sector-specific policies could also influence its performance.
GLRY Top 10 Holdings
GLRY leans heavily into U.S. mid-cap industrials and tech, with names like KLA and Monolithic Power doing much of the heavy lifting as their momentum in chips and electronics keeps the fund’s growth story alive. Defense and engineering plays Curtiss-Wright and BWX Technologies have been steady contributors over the longer run, even if they’ve cooled recently. On the weaker side, Broadcom and Amphenol have been losing steam, while AppLovin’s choppy ride has weighed on returns, leaving the ETF concentrated in a handful of tech-driven, North America–focused winners and laggards.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLA | 5.58% | $8.67M | $231.85B | 165.58% | 77 Outperform | |
| BWX Technologies | 5.04% | $7.84M | $21.33B | 124.16% | 75 Outperform | |
| Monolithic Power | 5.03% | $7.81M | $67.40B | 152.13% | 75 Outperform | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 5.02% | $7.81M | $27.06B | 131.46% | 74 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.81% | $7.48M | $1.80T | 112.78% | 76 Outperform | |
| EMCOR Group | 4.75% | $7.39M | $36.17B | 108.71% | 73 Outperform | |
| Amphenol | 4.59% | $7.13M | $178.57B | 120.91% | 78 Outperform | |
| United Therapeutics | 4.07% | $6.33M | $25.32B | 103.17% | 79 Outperform | |
| Casey's General | 3.78% | $5.87M | $27.16B | 59.87% | 68 Neutral | |
| Flowserve | 3.77% | $5.86M | $10.75B | 90.70% | 79 Outperform |
GLRY Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
38.33
Positive
37.53
Positive
36.36
Positive
Market Momentum
0.54
Negative
68.74
Neutral
96.95
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GLRY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 38.00, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.36, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.54 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 68.74 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 96.95 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GLRY.
GLRY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
40.70
12.77
45.72%
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
TMVE
Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
―
―
―
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents