WAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR)
Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating that its strategy has recently been working well for investors.
Leading Holdings With Strong Momentum
Several of the largest positions, such as Micron, Astronics, and Moog, have shown strong performance this year, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Focused Exposure To Technology And Defense
The fund’s heavy tilt toward technology and aerospace & defense companies offers targeted exposure to sectors that can benefit from long-term innovation and security spending trends.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has slipped over the past one and three months, showing that it can be volatile over shorter periods.
Concentrated Sector And Country Risk
With most assets in U.S. technology and industrial stocks, the fund is vulnerable if these sectors or the U.S. market experience a downturn.
WAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM21.74M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.95
IssuerUS Global
Inception DateDec 30, 2024
Dividend Yield11%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume14,693
30 Day Avg. Volume26,919
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.92Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering29
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
WAR Summary
WAR is the U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead focuses on a theme: a mix of technology companies and aerospace and defense firms, mostly based in the U.S. You’ll see well-known names like Qualcomm and RTX, along with other tech and defense specialists. Someone might invest in WAR to seek growth from new technologies and rising defense spending, while getting diversification across many companies. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech and defense, so its price can swing a lot if those sectors fall out of favor.
How much will it cost me?The U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and management effort. It’s designed to give investors exposure to innovative technology and defense industries.
What would affect this ETF?The U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) could benefit from increased global defense spending and advancements in technology, such as cybersecurity and digital innovation, which are key drivers for its top holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused sectors like technology, and geopolitical tensions that could disrupt supply chains or defense contracts. Its global exposure also makes it sensitive to international economic conditions and regulatory changes.
WAR Top 10 Holdings
WAR is leaning hard into the crossroads of cutting-edge tech and modern defense, with a global mix of U.S., Australian, European, and Japanese names. High-flyers like Amprius Technologies and DroneShield are doing the heavy lifting, riding strong momentum in advanced batteries and counter-drone systems. Micron and Marvell add steady AI-chip power to the story, helping smooth out bumps. On the flip side, Astera Labs and AeroVironment have been lagging, acting like a bit of drag on the portfolio, even as the broader tech-and-defense theme stays firmly in focus.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DroneShield Limited | 6.97% | $1.51M | AU$3.20B | 267.69% | 61 Neutral | |
| Amprius Technologies Inc | 6.86% | $1.49M | $2.36B | 663.07% | 51 Neutral | |
| Micron | 6.51% | $1.42M | $474.31B | 500.62% | 79 Outperform | |
| MilDef Group AB | 6.34% | $1.38M | kr6.03B | -36.72% | 42 Neutral | |
| Astera Labs, Inc. | 6.22% | $1.35M | $25.37B | 180.75% | 68 Neutral | |
| Marvell | 5.90% | $1.28M | $112.36B | 151.24% | 76 Outperform | |
| AeroEdge Co.,Ltd | 5.83% | $1.27M | ¥52.54B | 623.48% | 56 Neutral | |
| AeroVironment | 4.88% | $1.06M | $8.97B | 36.13% | 52 Neutral | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 4.64% | $1.01M | $399.52B | 161.20% | 73 Outperform | |
| Innovative Solutions And Support | 4.51% | $980.87K | $447.48M | 318.29% | 75 Outperform |
WAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
25.11
Positive
24.28
Positive
23.05
Positive
Market Momentum
0.19
Negative
62.71
Neutral
95.12
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For WAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.05, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.11, and equal to the 200-day MA of 23.05, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.71 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.12 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for WAR.
WAR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
WAR
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF
26.85
9.70
56.56%
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
―
―
―
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
―
―
―
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
TEKX
SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents