WAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Top Holdings with Strong Gains
Several of the largest positions, including key technology and defense names, have delivered strong year-to-date gains that support the fund’s overall results.
Targeted Tech and Defense Exposure
The fund’s focus on technology and aerospace & defense gives investors concentrated exposure to two growth-oriented, innovation-driven areas of the market.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Concentrated Holdings
A small group of stocks makes up a large portion of the portfolio, increasing the impact that any one holding can have on performance.
Sector and Country Concentration Risk
Heavy exposure to U.S. stocks and to just two main sectors means the fund may be more sensitive to downturns in American technology or industrial companies.
WAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM33.62M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta1.01
IssuerUS Global
Inception DateDec 30, 2024
Dividend Yield9.76%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume37,782
30 Day Avg. Volume31,903
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.11Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering29
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
WAR Summary
WAR is an ETF that invests in a mix of technology and aerospace & defense companies, without tracking a specific index. It focuses on the broad technology theme, including areas like chips, drones, and advanced defense systems. Well-known holdings include chip makers Micron and AMD, alongside defense-related firms like AeroVironment. Someone might consider WAR if they want growth potential from cutting-edge tech plus exposure to defense spending, all in one fund. A key risk is that it’s heavily tilted toward tech and defense, so its price can swing a lot and may fall if these sectors struggle.
How much will it cost me?The U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and management effort. It’s designed to give investors exposure to innovative technology and defense industries.
What would affect this ETF?The U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF (WAR) could benefit from increased global defense spending and advancements in technology, such as cybersecurity and digital innovation, which are key drivers for its top holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused sectors like technology, and geopolitical tensions that could disrupt supply chains or defense contracts. Its global exposure also makes it sensitive to international economic conditions and regulatory changes.
WAR Top 10 Holdings
WAR is riding a powerful one-two punch of AI chips and defense tech. On the tech side, Marvell, Micron, and AMD are doing much of the heavy lifting, with AI and data center demand keeping these semiconductor names rising rather than sputtering. Astera Labs adds to that momentum, though its lofty valuation makes the ride a bit bumpier. On the defense and aerospace front, names like DroneShield and AeroVironment are more mixed, occasionally dragging on returns. With a global mix of holdings, the fund is clearly concentrated in semiconductors and specialized defense innovators.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micron | 9.86% | $3.14M | $817.22B | 590.87% | 79 Outperform | |
| Astera Labs, Inc. | 8.00% | $2.55M | $39.88B | 138.78% | 68 Neutral | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 7.22% | $2.30M | $691.54B | 266.91% | 73 Outperform | |
| Marvell | 6.75% | $2.15M | $154.88B | 170.03% | 76 Outperform | |
| MilDef Group AB | 6.09% | $1.94M | kr7.45B | -32.13% | 42 Neutral | |
| Amprius Technologies Inc | 6.03% | $1.92M | $2.39B | 505.72% | 51 Neutral | |
| DroneShield Limited | 5.77% | $1.84M | AU$3.02B | 183.75% | 61 Neutral | |
| AeroEdge Co.,Ltd | 5.05% | $1.61M | ¥47.52B | 479.35% | 56 Neutral | |
| Ambarella | 3.78% | $1.20M | $3.55B | 24.57% | 59 Neutral | |
| AeroVironment | 3.67% | $1.17M | $7.89B | 0.25% | 52 Neutral |
WAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
27.69
Positive
26.28
Positive
24.19
Positive
Market Momentum
0.90
Positive
54.25
Neutral
28.17
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For WAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.19, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.90 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.17 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for WAR.
WAR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
WAR
U.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETF
30.33
11.01
56.99%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
―
―
―
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
―
―
―
TEKY
Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
―
―
―
TEKX
SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents