Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
TSRS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF (TSRS)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top REIT Holdings
Most of the largest real estate holdings have shown solid gains so far this year, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.
Focused Real Estate Exposure
The fund’s heavy tilt toward U.S. real estate investment trusts offers targeted exposure for investors who want to concentrate on this income-oriented sector.
Positive Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered a modest positive return this year, indicating that its strategy has held up reasonably well in the current market.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With nearly all assets in the real estate sector, the fund is heavily exposed to property market cycles, interest rates, and sector-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all holdings are in U.S. companies, so the ETF offers little protection if the U.S. real estate market weakens.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s management fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
TSRS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM3.83M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.65%
Beta-0.11
IssuerTruth Social
Inception DateDec 30, 2025
Dividend Yield0.09%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMarketVector iREIT Red State REITs Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,625
30 Day Avg. Volume12,032
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
27.71Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering26
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
TSRS Summary
The Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF (TSRS) tracks the MarketVector iREIT Red State REITs Index, focusing on real estate investment trusts (REITs) that earn most of their money in U.S. states that usually vote Republican. It holds companies like Realty Income and VICI Properties, which own properties such as shopping centers, casinos, apartments, and other commercial buildings. Someone might invest in TSRS for income and diversification through real estate tied to specific regional economies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in U.S. real estate and can go up or down with that sector.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.65%, which means you’ll pay about $6.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because, even though it’s passively managed, it focuses on a narrow, specialized slice of the real estate market, which typically costs more to run than broad, plain-vanilla index funds.
What would affect this ETF?This U.S. real estate ETF could benefit if interest rates fall, making borrowing cheaper for its REIT holdings like Broadstone Net Lease, Realty Income, and VICI Properties, and if economic growth in its focus “red state” regions supports demand for commercial, residential, and industrial properties. On the negative side, higher interest rates, weaker property markets, or local policy changes that hurt real estate in these states could pressure REIT profits and reduce investor demand for this politically focused fund.
TSRS Top 10 Holdings
TSRS is very much a pure-play U.S. real estate story, with performance driven by a handful of steady net-lease and specialty REITs. Realty Income and Four Corners Property are doing the heavy lifting, with both names rising recently and helping to keep the fund’s income engine humming. Broadstone Net Lease and NNN REIT are also trending higher, adding to the tailwind. On the flip side, VICI Properties has been lagging, and Mid-America Apartment looks a bit tired, slightly dragging on returns. Overall, the ETF is concentrated in income-focused, red-state REITs rather than growthy tech or global plays.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadstone Net Lease | 8.15% | $314.22K | $3.58B | 20.08% | 61 Neutral | |
| NNN REIT | 8.02% | $309.30K | $8.01B | 8.24% | 78 Outperform | |
| VICI Properties | 7.73% | $297.89K | $30.84B | -3.58% | 73 Outperform | |
| Realty Income | 7.06% | $271.96K | $57.46B | 14.75% | 70 Outperform | |
| Four Corners Property | 6.29% | $242.28K | $2.64B | -11.42% | 71 Outperform | |
| NETSTREIT | 5.41% | $208.45K | $1.61B | 28.53% | 63 Neutral | |
| Lamar Advertising | 4.76% | $183.42K | $13.00B | 1.55% | 72 Outperform | |
| National Health Investors | 4.48% | $172.79K | $3.88B | 18.67% | 77 Outperform | |
| Kite Realty Group | 4.27% | $164.46K | $5.24B | 4.62% | 61 Neutral | |
| Mid-America Apartment | 3.86% | $148.72K | $16.23B | -13.91% | 71 Outperform |
TSRS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
Market Momentum
62.90
Neutral
56.94
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For TSRS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.55, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at 62.90 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 56.94 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for TSRS.
TSRS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
TSRS
Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF
25.91
0.93
3.72%
SRHR
SRH REIT Covered Call ETF
―
―
―
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
―
―
―
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
―
―
―
HAUS
Home Appreciation U.S. REIT ETF
―
―
―
IRET
iREIT - MarketVector Quality REIT Index ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents