tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SPHQ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPHQ

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
SPHQ, the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to major positions in high-quality companies like Apple, Lam Research, and Cisco, which combine strong financial performance with positive growth drivers such as AI and services expansion. Holdings like Visa, Mastercard, Netflix, and Costco also support the fund’s quality profile, though their high valuations and some bearish technical signals, along with weaker names like SanDisk facing profitability challenges, modestly restrain the rating. A key risk factor is the fund’s reliance on a concentrated group of large, growth-oriented U.S. companies, which can increase sensitivity to market downturns and valuation resets.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Quality Tech and Industrial Leaders
Several major holdings in technology and industrials, such as Lam Research, KLA, Cisco, Caterpillar, and Costco, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Low Expense Ratio for a Large Fund
The ETF’s relatively low fee and large asset base mean investors get broad exposure to quality companies at a modest ongoing cost.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Sector Concentration in Technology and Industrials
A large portion of the portfolio is in technology and industrial companies, which could hurt returns if these sectors face a downturn.
Several Large Holdings Are Lagging
Some top positions like Apple, Visa, Mastercard, GE, and Procter & Gamble have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund if this trend continues.

SPHQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPHQ Summary

SPHQ is the Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Quality index. It focuses on large, financially strong U.S. companies with steady earnings and solid balance sheets. The fund holds well-known names like Apple and Costco, along with other established blue-chip businesses across technology, industrials, and consumer sectors. Someone might invest in SPHQ to seek long-term growth while tilting toward higher-quality companies instead of the overall market. A key risk is that it still owns stocks, so its value can go up and down with the stock market, especially U.S. large-cap companies.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than the average for actively managed funds because SPHQ is passively managed, tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index to keep costs down.
What would affect this ETF?The SPHQ ETF, with its focus on high-quality large-cap U.S. stocks, could benefit from continued strength in the technology sector, which is its largest exposure, as well as stable consumer demand for defensive products from companies like Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact industrial and financial sectors, which also make up significant portions of the fund's holdings. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting major companies like Apple and Visa could further influence the ETF's performance.

SPHQ Top 10 Holdings

SPHQ is leaning heavily on U.S. tech and payment giants, with Lam Research and Cisco doing much of the heavy lifting as they ride strong momentum tied to AI and networking demand. Apple has been more of a steady engine than a rocket, helping but not dominating returns. On the flip side, Visa and Mastercard have been losing a bit of altitude, and Netflix is clearly dragging the fund. There’s also a notable industrial tilt through GE Aerospace and GE Vernova, giving this quality-focused ETF a U.S.-centric mix of high-end tech and industrial powerhouses.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple5.43%$1.07B$4.62T55.83%
79
Outperform
Visa5.31%$1.05B$670.79B1.50%
70
Outperform
Mastercard5.29%$1.04B$475.39B-3.66%
75
Outperform
Lam Research4.46%$878.01M$432.82B234.19%
77
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.4.33%$850.90M$286.46B88.05%
69
Neutral
GE Aerospace3.89%$764.63M$369.06B35.38%
72
Outperform
Costco3.78%$743.01M$408.78B-3.66%
72
Outperform
Netflix3.75%$737.10M$309.62B-41.07%
73
Outperform
Cisco Systems3.53%$695.06M$461.50B65.90%
77
Outperform
SanDisk Corp3.10%$609.96M$260.32B3804.74%
55
Neutral

SPHQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
85.61
Positive
100DMA
81.77
Positive
200DMA
78.31
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.34
Positive
RSI
46.54
Neutral
STOCH
25.69
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPHQ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 87.90, equal to the 50-day MA of 85.61, and equal to the 200-day MA of 78.31, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.34 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 25.69 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for SPHQ.

SPHQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$19.89B0.15%
73
Outperform
$998.44B0.03%
74
Outperform
$885.97B0.03%
74
Outperform
$783.83B0.09%
74
Outperform
$481.58B0.18%
73
Outperform
$159.81B0.02%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
85.58
15.06
21.36%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement