tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SMOT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SMOT

VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
SMOT, the VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because several core holdings like Royalty Pharma, Corteva, and Stifel Financial show strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strategic growth initiatives that support future expansion. At the same time, weaker names such as Masco, with mixed financials and bearish trading signals, and holdings facing high valuations or leverage issues, slightly weigh on the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is that many top positions share concerns around rich valuations and some bearish or mixed technical trends, which could increase volatility if market sentiment turns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and in recent months, showing positive momentum for investors.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including health care, industrials, consumer stocks, technology, and more, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Bio-Techne, Masco, Block, Royalty Pharma, Corteva, and Amcor, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited international diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Some key positions, including Acuity Brands, IQVIA Holdings, TransUnion, and Stifel Financial, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund’s returns.

SMOT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SMOT Summary

The VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) tracks the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index, which looks for smaller and mid-sized U.S. companies with strong competitive advantages, or “moats.” It spreads investments across many sectors, including health care, industrials, and technology, and holds well-known names like Corteva and TransUnion. Someone might invest in SMOT to seek long-term growth and diversify beyond the usual large-company funds. A key risk is that smaller and mid-sized stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can rise and fall more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (Ticker: SMOT) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on identifying companies with strong competitive advantages or 'moats.'
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as smaller companies often struggle with higher borrowing costs, or if economic uncertainty impacts consumer spending. Its focus on U.S. small and mid-cap stocks provides growth potential but also exposes it to volatility compared to large-cap investments.

SMOT Top 10 Holdings

SMOT leans heavily into U.S. small and mid-cap health care and industrial names, with a few consumer and materials plays rounding out the mix. Royalty Pharma has been a key engine, rising steadily on strong profitability and deal-making, while Corteva adds another pillar of strength with solid, moat-like fundamentals. Bio-Techne has been more of a steady contributor, its momentum offset by concerns about slowing growth. On the weaker side, Acuity Brands and IQVIA have shown mixed, sometimes lagging performance, occasionally acting as a brake on the fund’s otherwise upbeat trajectory.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Bio-Techne1.63%$5.49M$11.32B43.81%
64
Neutral
IQVIA Holdings1.61%$5.43M$39.29B34.37%
73
Outperform
Airbnb1.61%$5.43M$106.33B56.13%
71
Outperform
Acuity Brands1.55%$5.23M$10.76B12.83%
77
Outperform
Amcor1.47%$4.94M$22.13B-2.26%
73
Outperform
Lamb Weston Holdings1.44%$4.84M$7.19B0.31%
61
Neutral
Masco1.42%$4.80M$15.28B8.45%
53
Neutral
Stifel Financial1.42%$4.79M$12.60B12.95%
75
Outperform
Block1.41%$4.75M$47.46B8.15%
72
Outperform
Royalty Pharma1.40%$4.72M$32.65B60.18%
79
Outperform

SMOT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.33
Positive
100DMA
38.08
Positive
200DMA
37.17
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.55
Negative
RSI
66.67
Neutral
STOCH
93.67
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMOT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.11, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 37.17, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.55 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 66.67 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.67 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SMOT.

SMOT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$337.87M0.49%
68
Neutral
$789.65M0.75%
68
Neutral
$733.02M0.62%
64
Neutral
$533.12M0.75%
71
Outperform
$345.03M0.53%
64
Neutral
$280.68M0.55%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SMOT
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
41.27
6.00
17.01%
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement