tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SMCO - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SMCO

Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
SMCO, the Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its top holdings, like Dycom (DY), Clean Harbors (CLH), and Cullen/Frost Bankers (CFR), show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends or valuations. These strengths are partly offset by weaker spots such as IdaCorp (IDA) and MACOM Technology Solutions (MTSI), where bearish momentum, valuation concerns, and cash flow or profitability challenges weigh on the fund, highlighting the risk that some holdings face operational or market headwinds even within an otherwise strong portfolio.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Mostly Performing Well
Most of the top 10 stocks, such as MKS, Primoris Services, and Clean Harbors, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including industrials, technology, consumer cyclical, financials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Some Weakness in Top Holdings
At least one major holding, such as Planet Fitness, has shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall fund results if the weakness continues.

SMCO vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SMCO Summary

The Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) invests in smaller and mid-sized U.S. companies, without tracking a specific index, aiming to tap into the growth potential of the “extended market” beyond the big, well-known large caps. It holds a mix of sectors like industrials, technology, and consumer companies, including recognizable names such as Yeti Holdings and Planet Fitness. Someone might invest in SMCO to seek higher long-term growth and add diversification beyond large-company funds. A key risk is that smaller stocks can be more volatile, so the price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) has an expense ratio of 0.55%, which means you’ll pay $5.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to select and maintain its portfolio of small and mid-sized companies.
What would affect this ETF?The Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like Industrials and Technology, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as smaller companies often have higher borrowing costs, or if economic conditions weaken, which could impact consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its focus on U.S.-based small and mid-sized companies also makes it sensitive to domestic regulatory changes and market trends.

SMCO Top 10 Holdings

SMCO is leaning hard into U.S. industrial and tech names, with stocks like Dycom, Primoris Services, and nVent Electric quietly powering the fund as their steady-to-rising trends reflect solid execution and growth stories. Ciena and MKS Instruments are the real engines lately, with strong momentum that’s giving performance an extra boost. On the flip side, Yeti is more of a passenger than a driver right now, with mixed signals and some drag. Overall, this is a domestically focused, small‑mid cap play built around industrial strength and tech upside.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
EQT2.73%$3.98M$39.65B20.20%
76
Outperform
Dycom2.63%$3.84M$10.56B131.79%
80
Outperform
Teledyne Technologies2.62%$3.82M$29.35B28.43%
71
Outperform
Clean Harbors2.57%$3.75M$15.40B49.07%
78
Outperform
IdaCorp2.43%$3.54M$7.68B22.77%
64
Neutral
2.32%$3.38M
Primoris Services2.32%$3.38M$7.47B120.77%
75
Outperform
nVent Electric2.24%$3.27M$19.45B111.52%
76
Outperform
Cullen/Frost Bankers2.23%$3.25M$8.18B6.30%
77
Outperform
MKS2.14%$3.12M$15.70B160.81%
75
Outperform

SMCO Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
28.40
Negative
100DMA
27.56
Negative
200DMA
26.78
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.45
Positive
RSI
33.62
Neutral
STOCH
21.77
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMCO, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.08, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.40, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.78, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.45 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.62 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.77 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SMCO.

SMCO Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$146.29M0.55%
69
Neutral
$690.21M0.57%
65
Neutral
$679.13M0.75%
69
Neutral
$369.13M0.75%
70
Neutral
$211.20M0.65%
68
Neutral
$197.49M0.56%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SMCO
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
26.98
3.26
13.74%
MSSM
Morgan Stanley Pathway Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
RSMC
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
GRNJ
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
SMIZ
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement