tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SCOW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SCOW

Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
SCOW’s rating suggests it is a solid but not flawless ETF, driven largely by strong, profitable holdings like NMI Holdings and InterDigital, which benefit from robust earnings, good cost management, and positive outlooks. The fund is held back somewhat by weaker names like Etsy and Enphase Energy, where financial instability, bearish technical trends, and growth challenges create more uncertainty. A key risk factor is that several top holdings show bearish or overbought technical signals and leverage-related concerns, which could increase volatility for investors.
Positive Factors
Quality Small-Cap Focus
The fund targets smaller U.S. companies with strong free cash flow and dividend histories, aiming for higher-quality businesses within the small-cap space.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings are spread across technology, financials, consumer sectors, industrials, health care, energy, and more, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Several Strong Top Contributors
Some of the largest positions, such as Etsy, Enphase Energy, Jackson Financial, InterDigital, and Magnolia Oil & Gas, have shown strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has posted negative returns over the past one and three months, signaling recent performance headwinds.
Concentrated and U.S.-Only Exposure
A small group of holdings makes up a meaningful share of the portfolio and nearly all assets are in U.S. stocks, increasing both single-stock and single-country risk.

SCOW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SCOW Summary

SCOW is an ETF that follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, focusing on smaller U.S. companies with strong, consistent cash flow. It holds a mix of sectors like technology, financials, and consumer companies, and includes well-known names such as Etsy and Enphase Energy. Investors might consider SCOW if they want growth potential from small-cap stocks while still focusing on financially solid businesses and diversifying beyond large, well-known companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile than larger companies, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for SCOW is 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because SCOW is passively managed but focuses on a niche strategy targeting high-quality small-cap companies, which can involve more specialized research and tracking.
What would affect this ETF?The SCOW ETF, focused on high-quality small-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, small-cap stocks are often more sensitive to rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact the ETF's performance. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges, particularly in technology and financials, may also pose risks.

SCOW Top 10 Holdings

SCOW leans heavily into U.S. small-cap financials and tech, with Jackson Financial and Enova International acting as key performance engines thanks to their rising momentum and solid cash generation. Etsy and Magnolia Oil & Gas add a consumer and energy twist, with Etsy’s recent rebound helping offset earlier stumbles and Magnolia staying relatively steady despite choppy commodity sentiment. On the weaker side, MarketAxess and Box have been lagging, putting a bit of drag on the fund. Overall, it’s a U.S.-only, quality-focused small-cap story with a noticeable tilt toward financials and technology.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Jackson Financial Incorporation6.06%$92.34K$7.62B15.98%
73
Outperform
Marketaxess Holdings4.93%$75.08K$6.60B-8.28%
68
Neutral
InterDigital4.82%$73.51K$9.17B66.52%
76
Outperform
Enova International3.90%$59.47K$3.67B33.96%
71
Outperform
Magnolia Oil & Gas3.82%$58.26K$4.90B10.55%
65
Neutral
Enphase Energy3.72%$56.77K$5.78B-30.97%
61
Neutral
Etsy3.24%$49.45K$4.56B-19.16%
57
Neutral
Bread Financial Holdings2.89%$44.10K$3.30B15.80%
72
Outperform
NMI Holdings2.55%$38.91K$3.15B15.32%
79
Outperform
Box2.50%$38.07K$3.27B-35.50%
65
Neutral

SCOW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
20.18
Negative
100DMA
20.11
Negative
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
<0.01
Negative
RSI
44.00
Neutral
STOCH
70.09
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SCOW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 20.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 20.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of <0.01 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 44.00 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.09 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SCOW.

SCOW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.52M0.59%
$82.09M0.75%
$75.27M0.18%
$75.03M0.04%
$70.86M0.35%
$62.55M0.74%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
19.82
-0.21
-1.05%
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
STXK
Strive 2000 ETF
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
SYZ
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement