Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SCOW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Quality Small-Cap Focus
The fund targets smaller U.S. companies with strong free cash flow and dividend histories, aiming for higher-quality businesses within the small-cap space.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings are spread across technology, financials, consumer sectors, industrials, health care, energy, and more, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Several Strong Top Contributors
Some of the largest positions, such as Etsy, Enphase Energy, Jackson Financial, InterDigital, and Magnolia Oil & Gas, have shown strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has posted negative returns over the past one and three months, signaling recent performance headwinds.
Concentrated and U.S.-Only Exposure
A small group of holdings makes up a meaningful share of the portfolio and nearly all assets are in U.S. stocks, increasing both single-stock and single-country risk.
SCOW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.44M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta1.04
IssuerPacer
Inception DateAug 27, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume510
30 Day Avg. Volume782
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
23.87Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering75
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SCOW Summary
SCOW is an ETF that follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, focusing on smaller U.S. companies with strong, consistent cash flow. It holds a mix of sectors like technology, financials, and consumer companies, and includes well-known names such as Etsy and Enphase Energy. Investors might consider SCOW if they want growth potential from small-cap stocks while still focusing on financially solid businesses and diversifying beyond large, well-known companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile than larger companies, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for SCOW is 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because SCOW is passively managed but focuses on a niche strategy targeting high-quality small-cap companies, which can involve more specialized research and tracking.
What would affect this ETF?The SCOW ETF, focused on high-quality small-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, small-cap stocks are often more sensitive to rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact the ETF's performance. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges, particularly in technology and financials, may also pose risks.
SCOW Top 10 Holdings
SCOW is leaning hard into U.S. small-cap quality, with a clear tilt toward financials and tech. Recent strength from Magnolia Oil & Gas and Enphase Energy has been a key engine, as both have been climbing and giving the fund some welcome momentum from energy and clean-tech themes. InterDigital and Bread Financial are also pulling their weight with steady-to-rising performance. On the flip side, Etsy is losing steam and Box has been dragging, reminding investors that not every small-cap “aristocrat” is royalty in the market right now.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson Financial Incorporation | 5.87% | $84.29K | $7.40B | 26.50% | 73 Outperform | |
| Marketaxess Holdings | 5.29% | $76.04K | $6.40B | -15.19% | 68 Neutral | |
| InterDigital | 5.09% | $73.19K | $9.22B | 65.40% | 76 Outperform | |
| Magnolia Oil & Gas | 4.35% | $62.54K | $5.50B | 26.77% | 65 Neutral | |
| Etsy | 3.77% | $54.17K | $5.01B | 13.95% | 57 Neutral | |
| Enova International | 3.68% | $52.81K | $3.35B | 44.80% | 71 Outperform | |
| Enphase Energy | 3.49% | $50.14K | $5.78B | -24.19% | 61 Neutral | |
| Bread Financial Holdings | 2.89% | $41.56K | $3.08B | 45.27% | 72 Outperform | |
| Box | 2.81% | $40.31K | $3.45B | -20.33% | 65 Neutral | |
| NMI Holdings | 2.46% | $35.31K | $2.84B | 5.40% | 79 Outperform |
SCOW Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
19.99
Negative
19.96
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.21
Positive
36.54
Neutral
2.54
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SCOW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 19.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.21 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 2.54 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SCOW.
SCOW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
19.23
-0.78
-3.90%
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
STXK
Strive 2000 ETF
―
―
―
SYZ
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents