tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

ROSC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ROSC

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
ROSC, the Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because several of its key holdings, like Catalyst Pharma and Harmony Biosciences, show strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and supportive technical trends that point to healthy growth potential. Additional support comes from companies such as Pediatrix Medical Group and National Healthcare, which add stability through solid cash flow and shareholder-friendly policies. The main risks come from holdings like BrightSpring Health Services and Indivior, where high leverage, weaker profitability, and valuation concerns highlight the fund’s exposure to financially riskier small-cap names.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Several Strong Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, such as Amkor, Argan, and Dillard’s, have shown strong recent performance, supporting the ETF’s overall returns.
Solid Recent Performance Trend
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month and quarter, indicating positive recent momentum in its small-cap strategy.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio for a Small-Cap ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side compared with many broad market ETFs, which slightly reduces net returns over time.
Concentrated U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, including Macy’s, PTC Therapeutics, and Indivior, have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on the fund if this continues.

ROSC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ROSC Summary

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) tracks the Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index and invests in many smaller U.S. companies across different industries, including health care, consumer, financials, and technology. It uses a rules-based approach to pick stocks, aiming for a mix of value, quality, and momentum. Well-known names in the fund include Macy’s and Dillard’s. Someone might invest in ROSC for growth potential and diversification, since small companies can grow faster than large ones. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) has an expense ratio of 0.34%, which means you’ll pay $3.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multifactor strategy to select stocks, aiming to enhance returns and reduce risk. It’s a good option if you’re looking for a strategic approach to small-cap investing.
What would affect this ETF?The Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like Health Care and Technology, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which can disproportionately impact small-cap companies and consumer-focused sectors like Consumer Cyclical. Additionally, changes in U.S. regulations or trade policies could affect the ETF's performance due to its focus on U.S. small-cap stocks.

ROSC Top 10 Holdings

ROSC is leaning heavily into U.S. small-cap health care, with names like National Healthcare and BrightSpring Health Services quietly pulling the fund forward as their shares trend higher. Perdoceo Education adds a steady boost from outside health care, helping diversify the return drivers. On the flip side, Dillard’s has been losing steam, while Indivior, Harmony Biosciences, and Tactile Systems have been clear laggards, acting as a brake on performance. Overall, the fund is U.S.-focused and health-care tilted, with a handful of struggling stocks masking some solid underlying momentum.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Perdoceo Education1.04%$515.83K$2.32B42.46%
72
Outperform
Phibro Animal Health1.04%$515.16K$2.24B151.75%
64
Neutral
Pediatrix Medical Group1.02%$507.23K$1.78B47.42%
76
Outperform
National Healthcare1.00%$497.39K$2.48B70.67%
74
Outperform
Catalyst Pharma0.98%$486.96K$3.02B3.51%
83
Outperform
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.0.95%$472.93K$8.25B137.51%
67
Neutral
Dillard's0.93%$461.18K$8.93B58.27%
76
Outperform
Indivior0.93%$460.87K$3.81B224.95%
66
Neutral
Garrett Motion0.91%$453.46K$3.45B124.60%
71
Outperform
Harmony Biosciences Holdings0.91%$452.38K$1.62B-13.60%
81
Outperform

ROSC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
49.32
Negative
100DMA
47.97
Positive
200DMA
45.59
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.40
Negative
RSI
47.50
Neutral
STOCH
37.33
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ROSC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 48.30, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.32, and equal to the 200-day MA of 45.59, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.40 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.50 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 37.33 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for ROSC.

ROSC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$48.83M0.34%
70
Outperform
$77.59M0.75%
70
Neutral
$72.58M0.04%
66
Neutral
$71.06M0.18%
66
Neutral
$57.14M0.74%
65
Neutral
$47.04M0.35%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
48.30
8.30
20.75%
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
STXK
Strive 2000 ETF
SYZ
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement