tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SCDS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS)

Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:
SCDS, the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong underlying companies like AZZ, TTMI, and Credo Technology Group, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and generally supportive technical trends. However, some holdings such as Bloom Energy and Modine introduce risks through high leverage, valuation concerns, and weaker technical signals, and the fund’s focus on smaller, more specialized companies means investors should be comfortable with higher volatility and stock-specific risk.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its strategy.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including technology, health care, financials, and industrials, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Several Strong-Performing Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions, such as Bloom Energy, Vicor, and Rambus, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Market Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. stocks, the fund is heavily tied to the health of the U.S. market and offers very limited international diversification.
Relatively High Expense Ratio for an ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of staying with investors.
Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of assets, which can sometimes lead to lower trading volume and wider bid-ask spreads for investors.

SCDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SCDS Summary

The JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is an actively managed fund that focuses on smaller U.S. companies, using data science tools to pick stocks rather than tracking a set index. It spreads investments across many sectors, including technology, health care, and financials, and holds names like Bloom Energy and Fabrinet. Someone might consider this ETF for growth potential and diversification into small-cap stocks that may be overlooked. However, small-company shares can be very volatile, so the value of this ETF can rise and fall more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund uses an actively managed, data-driven approach to select small-cap stocks, requiring more research and expertise compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The SCDS ETF, focused on U.S. small-cap stocks, could benefit from advancements in technology and healthcare sectors, which are its largest exposures, as well as potential economic growth that supports small businesses. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for smaller companies, and economic downturns that disproportionately impact small-cap stocks. Regulatory changes or shifts in consumer spending could also influence its performance.

SCDS Top 10 Holdings

This small-cap ETF is leaning into U.S. industrial and tech names, with Modine, TTMI Technologies, Moog, and Fabrinet doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been steadily rising and, in some cases, surging in recent months. Vicor and AZZ are also pulling their weight with solid, if less dramatic, gains. On the weaker side, Credo Technology has been lagging, acting as a bit of sand in the ETF’s gears, while Bloom Energy’s strong longer-term run has been more mixed lately. Overall, performance is driven by a diversified mix of U.S. small-cap innovators rather than a single dominant sector or stock.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
3.78%$260.98K
Fabrinet1.58%$108.89K$17.53B152.48%
78
Outperform
Bloom Energy1.45%$100.47K$37.93B485.74%
62
Neutral
Vicor1.22%$84.05K$7.38B173.16%
73
Outperform
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.96%$66.32K$20.26B151.33%
77
Outperform
TTM Technologies0.95%$65.90K$9.09B282.88%
77
Outperform
AZZ0.95%$65.42K$3.70B37.67%
79
Outperform
Ryman0.94%$65.22K$6.04B-3.04%
66
Neutral
Modine0.92%$63.89K$9.88B131.79%
68
Neutral
Moog0.88%$60.74K$10.08B86.35%
73
Outperform

SCDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
63.56
Negative
100DMA
61.44
Negative
200DMA
58.34
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.23
Positive
RSI
35.24
Neutral
STOCH
27.55
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SCDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 64.31, equal to the 50-day MA of 63.56, and equal to the 200-day MA of 58.34, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.23 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 35.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.55 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SCDS.

SCDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$7.54M0.40%
65
Neutral
$86.40M0.75%
70
Neutral
$58.91M0.74%
66
Neutral
$24.57M0.74%
72
Outperform
$23.89M0.85%
71
Outperform
$20.11M0.49%
65
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SCDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF
61.36
11.32
22.62%
AFSM
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
SYZ
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Equity ETF
ALIL
Argent Focused Small Cap ETF
FTKI
First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF
ESSC
Eventide Small Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement