tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RWK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
RWK’s overall rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, reflecting a mix of strong and more challenged mid-cap companies. Higher-quality holdings like Lithia Motors, US Foods, TD SYNNEX, and Penske Automotive support the fund with strong financial performance, strategic growth, and generally positive outlooks, while weaker names such as PBF Energy and some highly leveraged or operationally pressured companies like Performance Food Group and Albertsons weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is exposure to several businesses facing high leverage, profitability pressures, or mixed technical signals, which can add volatility to the fund’s returns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Revenue-Weighted Mid-Cap Exposure
By focusing on mid-sized companies and weighting them by revenue, the fund tilts toward businesses with meaningful sales rather than just market hype.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including industrials, consumer cyclical, financials, technology, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited international diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several major positions have delivered strong gains, a few key holdings have been weak or flat, which can drag on overall returns if that continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not extremely high but are somewhat elevated compared with many low-cost index ETFs, slightly reducing the net return to investors over time.

RWK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWK Summary

RWK is the Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It focuses on medium-sized U.S. companies and gives more weight to businesses that bring in higher sales. The fund holds a wide mix of sectors, including industrials, consumer companies, and financials. Well-known names in the ETF include Albertsons Companies and American Airlines. Someone might invest in RWK to diversify beyond large, well-known stocks and tap into the growth potential of mid-sized companies. A key risk is that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on revenue-weighted mid-cap companies rather than traditional market-cap weighting.
What would affect this ETF?RWK's focus on mid-sized U.S. companies could benefit from economic growth, as these firms often thrive during periods of expansion and consumer spending increases, especially in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies, which often rely on borrowing for growth and are more sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory changes in Technology or Energy, could affect the ETF's performance.

RWK Top 10 Holdings

RWK’s story is all about U.S. mid-cap workhorses, with a clear tilt toward industrials and consumer-focused names rather than flashy megacaps. TD SYNNEX and Arrow Electronics have been the fund’s standout engines, rising steadily on strong tech distribution and electronics demand. American Airlines has also been climbing, giving a lift from the travel side. On the flip side, Albertsons has been losing steam, and PBF Energy’s mixed performance has added some drag. Overall, the ETF leans into cyclical, domestically driven businesses that move with the U.S. economy.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Performance Food Group2.99%$38.40M$17.50B12.57%
65
Neutral
TD SYNNEX Corporation2.46%$31.68M$20.20B69.96%
73
Outperform
Albertsons Companies2.36%$30.32M$7.15B-44.30%
64
Neutral
American Airlines2.31%$29.71M$9.78B18.28%
64
Neutral
PBF Energy1.79%$23.06M$7.61B165.54%
55
Neutral
US Foods Holding1.72%$22.09M$21.15B16.82%
74
Outperform
Lithia Motors1.69%$21.71M$7.75B7.82%
76
Outperform
Penske Automotive Group1.53%$19.69M$14.11B26.19%
71
Outperform
HF Sinclair Corporation1.42%$18.26M$16.38B103.08%
68
Neutral
Arrow Electronics1.37%$17.57M$11.19B69.18%
64
Neutral

RWK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
143.21
Positive
100DMA
137.90
Positive
200DMA
132.89
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.03
Positive
RSI
49.71
Neutral
STOCH
44.83
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWK, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 146.41, equal to the 50-day MA of 143.21, and equal to the 200-day MA of 132.89, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 1.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.71 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.83 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RWK.

RWK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.31B0.39%
69
Neutral
$7.62B0.23%
69
Neutral
$7.47B0.35%
73
Outperform
$5.90B0.41%
70
Outperform
$5.33B0.25%
74
Outperform
$4.03B0.38%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
145.48
24.15
19.90%
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
DON
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement