tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RWK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWK

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
RWK, the Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a portfolio of mid-cap companies with generally strong business performance but some financial and technical risks. Higher-quality holdings like Lithia Motors, US Foods, Flex, and TD SYNNEX support the fund’s rating through strong earnings, positive outlooks, and strategic growth initiatives, while more challenged names such as American Airlines and Albertsons, with high leverage and profitability or margin pressures, weigh somewhat on the score. The main risk factor is exposure to several companies with elevated debt, cash flow challenges, or bearish/overbought technical signals, which can increase volatility for investors.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Healthy Asset Base
With over a billion dollars in assets, the fund is sizable, which can support better liquidity and trading efficiency for investors.
Revenue-Weighted Mid-Cap Exposure
By focusing on mid-sized companies and weighting them by revenue, the ETF tilts toward businesses with meaningful sales rather than just market size.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio for an ETF
The fund’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an index ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns over time.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering very limited international diversification.
Exposure to Volatile Cyclical Sectors
Large weights in industrial and consumer cyclical stocks mean the fund can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and shifts in consumer spending.

RWK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWK Summary

The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is a fund that invests in medium‑sized U.S. companies, following the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Instead of focusing on stock market size, it gives more weight to companies that bring in higher sales. It holds a mix of industries, including well-known names like American Airlines and Albertsons. An investor might choose RWK to diversify beyond large, famous companies and tap into the growth potential of mid-sized businesses. However, its value can go up and down with the stock market and mid-cap companies can be more volatile than large caps.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on revenue-weighted mid-cap companies rather than traditional market-cap weighting.
What would affect this ETF?RWK's focus on mid-sized U.S. companies could benefit from economic growth, as these firms often thrive during periods of expansion and consumer spending increases, especially in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies, which often rely on borrowing for growth and are more sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory changes in Technology or Energy, could affect the ETF's performance.

RWK Top 10 Holdings

RWK is leaning into U.S. mid-cap workhorses rather than flashy mega-caps, with a clear tilt toward industrials and consumer-focused names. Tech-oriented players like TD SYNNEX, Flex, and Arrow Electronics have been rising, quietly pulling the fund forward. On the consumer side, US Foods and Penske Automotive look steady to improving, while Albertsons is losing steam and American Airlines continues to drag, reflecting pressure in travel and traditional retail. Overall, the ETF is domestically focused and somewhat concentrated in economically sensitive, revenue-heavy businesses.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
TD SYNNEX Corporation3.57%$42.99M$18.56B84.84%
73
Outperform
Albertsons Companies2.86%$34.47M$7.87B-26.70%
64
Neutral
Performance Food Group2.78%$33.52M$14.93B8.68%
65
Neutral
American Airlines2.46%$29.57M$8.39B3.17%
64
Neutral
Flex2.31%$27.84M$51.36B233.79%
74
Outperform
Arrow Electronics1.71%$20.60M$10.30B66.19%
64
Neutral
Lithia Motors1.54%$18.49M$6.28B-15.44%
76
Outperform
US Foods Holding1.42%$17.06M$18.49B13.72%
74
Outperform
Penske Automotive Group1.35%$16.27M$11.11B1.92%
71
Outperform
HF Sinclair Corporation1.33%$16.01M$12.86B94.33%
68
Neutral

RWK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
133.16
Positive
100DMA
133.00
Positive
200DMA
128.25
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.21
Positive
RSI
54.44
Neutral
STOCH
27.29
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWK, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 138.88, equal to the 50-day MA of 133.16, and equal to the 200-day MA of 128.25, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 1.21 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.44 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.29 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWK.

RWK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.20B0.39%
69
Neutral
$7.06B0.35%
73
Outperform
$6.60B0.23%
70
Neutral
$5.45B0.41%
70
Outperform
$5.31B0.25%
73
Outperform
$3.87B0.38%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
138.49
24.64
21.64%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
DON
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement