Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RWK - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, such as TD SYNNEX and Flex, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio of 0.39% is reasonable compared to many actively managed funds, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in the U.S.
With nearly all assets allocated to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks meaningful global diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some top holdings, such as American Airlines and Albertsons Companies, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall performance.
Heavy Sector Weighting
The ETF is heavily weighted toward Consumer Cyclical and Industrials, which could make it vulnerable to economic downturns affecting these sectors.
RWK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.12B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.39%
Beta0.91
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateFeb 20, 2008
Dividend Yield1.19%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume25,434
30 Day Avg. Volume21,602
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
149.29Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering400
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RWK Summary
The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) is an investment fund that focuses on medium-sized U.S. companies by tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Instead of using market size, it selects companies based on their revenue, which can highlight firms with strong earning power. This ETF includes well-known names like Albertsons Companies and American Airlines, offering exposure to industries like consumer goods, technology, and financials. Investors might consider RWK for portfolio diversification and the growth potential of mid-sized companies. However, new investors should note that mid-cap stocks can be more volatile than larger companies, meaning the ETF’s value may rise and fall with market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on revenue-weighted mid-cap companies rather than traditional market-cap weighting.
What would affect this ETF?RWK's focus on mid-sized U.S. companies could benefit from economic growth, as these firms often thrive during periods of expansion and consumer spending increases, especially in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns may negatively impact mid-cap companies, which often rely on borrowing for growth and are more sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory changes in Technology or Energy, could affect the ETF's performance.
RWK Top 10 Holdings
The Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) leans heavily into consumer cyclical and industrial sectors, which together make up over 40% of its portfolio. Among its top holdings, Macy’s is rising steadily, buoyed by strong technical indicators and earnings recovery, while Flex is showing bullish momentum thanks to strategic growth initiatives. On the flip side, Albertsons is lagging, weighed down by operational challenges and bearish sentiment. The fund’s U.S.-focused mid-cap positioning offers a mix of growth and stability, but some names like PBF Energy are dragging performance with financial struggles.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albertsons Companies | 3.09% | $34.48M | $8.90B | -11.81% | 64 Neutral | |
| Performance Food Group | 2.72% | $30.43M | $15.31B | 11.26% | 65 Neutral | |
| TD SYNNEX Corporation | 2.36% | $26.41M | $12.22B | 9.41% | 73 Outperform | |
| American Airlines | 2.23% | $24.86M | $10.15B | -15.87% | 64 Neutral | |
| US Foods Holding | 1.79% | $20.01M | $19.11B | 25.47% | 74 Outperform | |
| Lithia Motors | 1.43% | $16.01M | $8.05B | -5.76% | 76 Outperform | |
| Arrow Electronics | 1.21% | $13.48M | $6.09B | 1.33% | 64 Neutral | |
| Penske Automotive Group | 1.20% | $13.35M | $10.80B | 2.16% | 71 Outperform | |
| PBF Energy | 1.11% | $12.41M | $3.42B | -4.77% | 55 Neutral | |
| Jones Lang Lasalle | 1.10% | $12.26M | $16.78B | 35.89% | 79 Outperform |
RWK Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
127.00
Positive
125.93
Positive
119.50
Positive
Market Momentum
1.78
Negative
64.70
Neutral
87.95
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWK, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 130.19, equal to the 50-day MA of 127.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 119.50, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.78 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.95 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWK.
RWK Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RWK
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
133.48
11.83
9.72%
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
―
―
―
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
DON
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents