Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RVER - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns so far this year, showing resilience despite recent market ups and downs.
Leading Winners in Top Holdings
Several major positions like Novo Nordisk, Rocket Companies, Cleanspark, Generac, and United Rentals have shown strong gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
The fund spreads its investments across health care, consumer, financial, communication, technology, and industrial companies, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
High Stock Concentration
A small group of holdings, including Novo Nordisk, Meta, Amazon, and Oscar Health, make up a large share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of them struggle.
Mixed Performance Among Top Positions
Some key holdings such as Meta Platforms and ServiceNow have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the ETF’s returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the investment return goes toward costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
RVER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM110.52M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.66%
Beta1.35
IssuerRiver1
Inception DateApr 03, 2024
Dividend Yield1.82%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume98,734
30 Day Avg. Volume30,035
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
40.27Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RVER Summary
RVER, the Trenchless Fund ETF, focuses on companies involved in modern, less-invasive infrastructure and utility work, but it also spreads money across many parts of the stock market. It does not track a traditional index, instead targeting the “total market” through this trenchless technology theme. Well-known holdings include Meta Platforms and Amazon, along with health care, financial, and industrial companies. Someone might invest for growth and diversification tied to future infrastructure and technology trends. A key risk is that the ETF is concentrated in a niche theme and its price can go up and down significantly with the stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Trenchless Fund ETF (Ticker: RVER) has an expense ratio of 0.66%, which means you’ll pay $6.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector with specialized expertise to target growth opportunities. While it costs more, the fund aims to deliver value through its unique investment strategy.
What would affect this ETF?The Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) could benefit from increasing demand for innovative infrastructure solutions, particularly in the U.S., where trenchless technology is gaining traction in utility installations and pipeline rehabilitation. However, its exposure to consumer cyclical and technology sectors may face challenges during economic downturns or periods of high interest rates, which can reduce spending and innovation. Regulatory changes or shifts in government infrastructure priorities could also impact the ETF's performance positively or negatively.
RVER Top 10 Holdings
RVER is leaning heavily on a few big health care and tech names, with Novo Nordisk acting as the main engine thanks to its steadily rising share price and hefty weight in the fund. Rocket Companies and Cleanspark have also been climbing, giving an extra boost from financials and more speculative tech. On the flip side, Meta and ServiceNow have been losing steam, dragging on recent returns, while Oscar Health and Mobileye show a more mixed, stop‑and‑go pattern. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, growth-tilted bet with notable concentration in a handful of names.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Platforms | 12.71% | $12.85M | $1.62T | -13.15% | 76 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 9.39% | $9.49M | $2.13T | -13.07% | 71 Outperform | |
| Rocket Companies | 7.80% | $7.88M | $52.60B | 8.71% | 54 Neutral | |
| ServiceNow | 7.07% | $7.15M | $112.01B | -45.73% | 75 Outperform | |
| United Rentals | 6.03% | $6.09M | $54.78B | 17.31% | 73 Outperform | |
| Generac Holdings | 5.36% | $5.41M | $13.17B | 52.84% | 59 Neutral | |
| ― | 4.94% | $5.00M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Microsoft | 4.77% | $4.82M | $2.98T | -1.74% | 79 Outperform | |
| Mobileye Global, Inc. Class A | 4.70% | $4.75M | $7.73B | -48.86% | 44 Neutral | |
| Palo Alto Networks | 4.67% | $4.72M | $134.91B | -16.54% | 73 Outperform |
RVER Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
31.48
Negative
31.76
Negative
31.08
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.89
Positive
33.89
Neutral
23.24
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RVER, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.99, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.48, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.08, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.89 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 23.24 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RVER.
RVER Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
28.92
-2.42
-7.72%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
―
―
―
ABFL
Fcf Us Quality Etf
―
―
―
BGDV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
―
―
―
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents