RVER - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER)

Rating:69Neutral

Price Target:―

The Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) has a solid overall rating, driven by strong contributions from holdings like Meta Platforms and Salesforce. Meta's focus on AI and engagement growth, combined with Salesforce's strategic initiatives and long-term growth prospects, significantly boost the fund's performance. However, weaker holdings such as Oscar Health and Mobileye, which face profitability and valuation challenges, slightly weigh down the ETF's rating. Investors should note the fund's exposure to diverse sectors, which mitigates risks but also includes holdings with notable financial and technical weaknesses.

Positive Factors

Strong Year-to-Date Performance

The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong overall momentum.

Sector Diversification

The fund is spread across multiple sectors, including Consumer Cyclical, Health Care, and Technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.

Top Holdings with Positive Returns

Several key holdings, such as Alphabet, Rocket Companies, and Oscar Health, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s growth.

Negative Factors

High Geographic Concentration

Nearly 90% of the fund’s exposure is in U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.

Underperforming Key Holdings

Some major positions, like Novo Nordisk and Mobileye, have lagged this year, potentially dragging down overall performance.

Relatively High Expense Ratio

The ETF’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost alternatives, which could eat into long-term returns.

RVER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM105.88M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.66%

Beta1.34

IssuerRiver1

Inception DateApr 03, 2024

Dividend Yield1.69%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume48,419

30 Day Avg. Volume12,333

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

39.01

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering15

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RVER Summary

The Trenchless Fund ETF (Ticker: RVER) is an investment fund that focuses on companies involved in trenchless technology, which uses innovative methods to build and maintain infrastructure without traditional digging. It includes well-known companies like Amazon and Novo Nordisk, along with others in sectors such as healthcare, technology, and consumer goods. Investors might consider RVER for its potential growth in a niche market that supports modern infrastructure development. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily influenced by the performance of the U.S. market, which makes it vulnerable to economic fluctuations.

How much will it cost me?The Trenchless Fund ETF (Ticker: RVER) has an expense ratio of 0.66%, which means you’ll pay $6.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector with specialized expertise to target growth opportunities. While it costs more, the fund aims to deliver value through its unique investment strategy.

What would affect this ETF?The Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) could benefit from increasing demand for innovative infrastructure solutions, particularly in the U.S., where trenchless technology is gaining traction in utility installations and pipeline rehabilitation. However, its exposure to consumer cyclical and technology sectors may face challenges during economic downturns or periods of high interest rates, which can reduce spending and innovation. Regulatory changes or shifts in government infrastructure priorities could also impact the ETF's performance positively or negatively.

RVER Top 10 Holdings

The Trenchless Fund ETF leans heavily on health care and technology, with Novo Nordisk and Meta Platforms among its top holdings. Novo Nordisk has been losing steam recently, weighed down by restructuring challenges, while Meta’s focus on AI and engagement growth has kept its performance steady despite mixed technical signals. Rocket Companies is rising, buoyed by strategic moves in AI, while PayPal and Mobileye are dragging the fund with bearish trends and valuation concerns. With a strong U.S. focus, the ETF’s sector concentration in innovation-driven industries offers both promise and volatility.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
NVO	Novo Nordisk	17.30%	$18.46M	$232.01B	-40.93%	73 Outperform
META	Meta Platforms	12.32%	$13.14M	$1.68T	9.41%	76 Outperform
	―	10.18%	$10.86M	―	―	―
AMZN	Amazon	7.89%	$8.41M	$2.48T	1.35%	71 Outperform
OSCR	Oscar Health	7.86%	$8.38M	$3.93B	10.75%	49 Neutral
RKT	Rocket Companies	7.00%	$7.47M	$53.73B	8.71%	54 Neutral
URI	United Rentals	4.76%	$5.08M	$52.04B	12.43%	73 Outperform
MBLY	Mobileye Global, Inc. Class A	4.66%	$4.98M	$8.27B	-46.36%	44 Neutral
TEAM	Atlassian	4.58%	$4.89M	$42.89B	-36.93%	66 Neutral
NOW	ServiceNow	4.49%	$4.79M	$160.29B	-30.19%	75 Outperform

RVER Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Neutral

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

31.66

Negative

100DMA

31.80

Negative

200DMA

30.13

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.16

Positive

RSI

48.25

Neutral

STOCH

20.73

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RVER, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.66, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.13, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.16 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 20.73 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RVER.

RVER Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RVER	―	―	$105.88M	0.66%	―
PLDR	―	―	$880.66M	0.60%	―
SYLD	―	―	$866.72M	0.59%	―
ABFL	―	―	$770.52M	0.49%	―
BGDV	―	―	$712.01M	0.45%	―
EBI	―	―	$576.44M	0.25%	―

Performance Comparison

RVER

Trenchless Fund ETF

31.22

1.21

4.03%

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

―

SYLD

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF

―

ABFL

Fcf Us Quality Etf

―

BGDV

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

―

EBI

Longview Advantage ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents