Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
BGDV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
$30.00
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Broadcom, TSMC, and Alphabet, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across ten sectors, including Technology, Financials, and Industrials, reducing the impact of a downturn in any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.45%, the fund is competitively priced compared to many actively managed ETFs.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is heavily concentrated in U.S. companies, offering limited exposure to international markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Motorola Solutions, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns.
Technology Overweight
The fund's heavy allocation to the Technology sector (27.74%) increases vulnerability to volatility in this industry.
BGDV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM698.16M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta0.79
IssuerBahl & Gaynor
Inception DateDec 11, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume5,954
30 Day Avg. Volume8,793
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
31.10Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering52
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
BGDV Summary
The Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) is an investment fund that focuses on dividend-paying stocks across the entire U.S. market. It includes companies from various sectors like technology, healthcare, and financials, offering a balanced mix of growth and income potential. Some well-known companies in the fund are Broadcom and Eli Lilly & Co. This ETF is ideal for investors looking for steady income through dividends while gaining exposure to a wide range of industries. However, since it heavily invests in U.S. stocks, its performance can be affected by overall market fluctuations.
How much will it cost me?The Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, meaning investment professionals select stocks rather than following a preset index. Active management often comes with higher costs due to the additional research and expertise involved.
What would affect this ETF?The Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF (BGDV), with its focus on dividend-paying stocks across sectors like technology, financials, and health care, could benefit from economic stability and growth, as well as increased demand for income-generating investments during periods of low interest rates. However, it may face challenges from sector-specific risks, such as regulatory changes in technology or health care, and broader economic downturns that could impact dividend payouts. Its heavy exposure to U.S. markets also makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and policy shifts.
BGDV Top 10 Holdings
The Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF leans heavily into technology, with nearly 28% of its portfolio in the sector, led by standout performers like Broadcom and TSMC, both riding the wave of AI-driven growth and strong demand for semiconductors. Alphabet also adds to the tech momentum with steady gains fueled by its cloud and AI initiatives. However, the fund’s performance is tempered by lagging names like Motorola Solutions and Meta Platforms, which face mixed technical signals and regulatory hurdles. With its U.S.-focused portfolio, the ETF offers a blend of growth and income, but its tech-heavy tilt may leave it vulnerable to sector-specific volatility.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom | 6.65% | $46.40M | $1.62T | 106.83% | 76 Outperform | |
| TSMC | 6.08% | $42.37M | $1.19T | 50.42% | 81 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 5.63% | $39.26M | $969.28B | 40.50% | 76 Outperform | |
| TJX Companies | 3.76% | $26.19M | $162.58B | 21.32% | 79 Outperform | |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions | 3.40% | $23.74M | $26.39B | -1.02% | 71 Outperform | |
| AbbVie | 3.32% | $23.17M | $410.67B | 40.73% | 62 Neutral | |
| Alphabet Class A | 3.15% | $21.95M | $3.34T | 62.59% | 80 Outperform | |
| Motorola Solutions | 3.07% | $21.41M | $63.29B | -22.98% | 71 Outperform | |
| Cintas | 2.85% | $19.84M | $75.04B | -15.00% | 70 Outperform | |
| Hartford Financial | 2.59% | $18.06M | $37.30B | 11.79% | 82 Outperform |
BGDV Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
26.80
Negative
26.22
Positive
25.14
Positive
Market Momentum
<0.01
Positive
44.13
Neutral
38.30
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BGDV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.75, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.80, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.14, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of <0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 44.13 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.30 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for BGDV.
BGDV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
BGDV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
26.52
1.57
6.29%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
―
―
―
ABFL
Fcf Us Quality Etf
―
―
―
EBI
Longview Advantage ETF
―
―
―
SMRI
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents