tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPG - AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
$86.00
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a solid overall rating, reflecting strong contributions from holdings like Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Baker Hughes (BKR). Exxon Mobil benefits from strategic growth initiatives and high-return assets, while Baker Hughes excels in industrial and energy technology growth and portfolio optimization. However, weaker holdings such as Marathon Petroleum (MPC), which faces revenue pressures and valuation concerns, slightly temper the fund’s overall score. A key risk factor is the ETF's concentration in the energy sector, which may expose it to volatility tied to oil and gas market fluctuations.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Marathon Petroleum and Valero Energy, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Focused Sector Exposure
The ETF's concentration in the energy sector allows investors to benefit from targeted growth in a high-performing industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.4%, the fund offers relatively low costs compared to many specialized ETFs.
Negative Factors
Sector Over-Concentration
The ETF is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, which increases vulnerability to industry-specific risks.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Diamondback and Texas Pacific Land, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall returns.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little exposure to international markets.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPG Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) focuses on the energy sector within the S&P 500, using an equal-weight strategy to give all included companies the same importance. This means it provides balanced exposure to a variety of energy-related businesses, from traditional oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil to newer players in the industry. Investors might consider RSPG for diversification and the potential growth of the energy sector, which is a key part of the global economy. However, it’s important to note that this ETF is heavily tied to the energy market, which can be volatile and influenced by factors like oil prices and geopolitical events.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF is firmly rooted in the energy sector, with a diverse mix of traditional oil and gas players alongside renewable energy innovators. Halliburton is rising as a standout performer, driven by strong financial results and strategic initiatives, while Marathon Petroleum and Valero Energy are steady contributors despite some challenges in renewable diesel operations. On the flip side, Diamondback and Texas Pacific Land are lagging, weighed down by bearish trends and commodity price pressures. With its U.S.-focused portfolio, the fund offers a balanced yet dynamic exposure to energy’s evolving landscape.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Halliburton5.38%$21.95M$22.64B-3.91%
72
Outperform
Valero Energy4.99%$20.36M$52.17B31.82%
75
Outperform
Marathon Petroleum4.90%$19.99M$59.65B29.89%
65
Neutral
Expand Energy4.89%$19.93M$24.71B21.84%
71
Outperform
EQT4.77%$19.44M$33.51B44.06%
78
Outperform
Diamondback4.69%$19.14M$42.22B-18.96%
67
Neutral
Exxon Mobil4.68%$19.08M$491.94B-2.49%
79
Outperform
Phillips 664.68%$19.07M$54.55B5.07%
64
Neutral
APA4.55%$18.55M$8.53B-1.52%
72
Outperform
Schlumberger4.54%$18.51M$53.53B-12.64%
75
Outperform

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
77.57
Negative
100DMA
76.28
Positive
200DMA
75.90
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.15
Negative
RSI
47.43
Neutral
STOCH
64.57
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 77.56, equal to the 50-day MA of 77.57, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.90, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.43 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 64.57 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$407.33M0.40%
72
Outperform
$691.47M0.40%
69
Neutral
$449.94M0.38%
71
Outperform
$351.34M0.57%
70
Neutral
$268.64M0.62%
71
Outperform
$108.72M0.60%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
76.93
1.87
2.49%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement