tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
RSPG, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by strong energy leaders like Baker Hughes, Texas Pacific Land, and Williams, which benefit from robust financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and generally supportive technical trends. Major holdings such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Targa Resources also add strength through solid cash generation and strategic projects, though concerns around revenue growth, cash flow, leverage, and some bearish or overvalued technical signals in names like Kinder Morgan and Occidental Petroleum slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk is its concentrated exposure to the energy sector, which can make the ETF more sensitive to commodity price swings and industry-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major energy service and oil companies, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Equal-Weight Energy Exposure
By spreading investments relatively evenly across many energy stocks, the ETF avoids relying too heavily on just one or two giants in the sector.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all of the fund is invested in energy stocks, so its performance is highly sensitive to swings in the energy market.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPG Summary

RSPG is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It invests in U.S. energy companies and gives each stock a similar weight, instead of letting the biggest companies dominate. Well-known holdings include Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other oil, gas, and energy service firms. Someone might invest in RSPG to get diversified exposure to the energy sector and potentially benefit from rising energy prices or industry growth. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy stocks, which can be very volatile and move sharply with oil and gas markets.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

RSPG is a pure U.S. energy play, and its story right now is all about traditional oil and gas. Texas Pacific Land has been the star of the show, rising sharply and giving the fund a strong tailwind. Service and equipment names like Schlumberger and Halliburton are also climbing, adding steady fuel to performance. Meanwhile, big integrated players such as Exxon and Chevron are more mixed, helping but not leading the charge. With everything tied to the energy patch, the ETF’s fortunes are closely hitched to the oil and gas cycle.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Texas Pacific Land6.46%$37.63M$30.38B11.45%
76
Outperform
Baker Hughes Company4.98%$29.00M$60.82B36.36%
76
Outperform
Schlumberger4.90%$28.52M$77.14B21.82%
75
Outperform
Targa Resources4.85%$28.24M$48.86B15.47%
74
Outperform
Occidental Petroleum4.78%$27.81M$46.41B2.82%
67
Neutral
Exxon Mobil4.74%$27.59M$635.44B33.06%
74
Outperform
Kinder Morgan4.74%$27.56M$71.84B23.93%
68
Neutral
Chevron4.67%$27.20M$370.23B17.21%
71
Outperform
Halliburton4.65%$27.07M$29.12B33.70%
72
Outperform
Williams Co4.64%$27.01M$88.10B27.05%
76
Outperform

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
86.04
Positive
100DMA
82.44
Positive
200DMA
78.55
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
3.51
Negative
RSI
72.76
Negative
STOCH
82.96
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 92.81, equal to the 50-day MA of 86.04, and equal to the 200-day MA of 78.55, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 3.51 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.76 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.96 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$581.69M0.40%
74
Outperform
$813.81M0.40%
70
Outperform
$587.49M0.57%
72
Outperform
$317.13M0.61%
74
Outperform
$119.63M0.60%
74
Outperform
$103.79M0.29%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
98.12
18.99
24.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement