tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
RSPG, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its biggest positions—like Diamondback Energy (FANG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Devon Energy (DVN), and EOG Resources (EOG)—show strong financial performance, supportive earnings calls, and generally attractive valuations. However, some holdings such as Occidental Petroleum (OXY) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) face technical or leverage-related concerns that slightly weigh on the fund, and the main risk is its concentrated exposure to the energy sector, which is sensitive to commodity price swings and broader market conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major energy service and oil companies, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Equal-Weight Energy Exposure
By spreading investments relatively evenly across many energy stocks, the ETF avoids relying too heavily on just one or two giants in the sector.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
Almost all of the fund is invested in energy stocks, so its performance is highly sensitive to swings in the energy market.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPG Summary

RSPG is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It invests in U.S. energy companies and gives each stock a similar weight, instead of letting the biggest companies dominate. Well-known holdings include Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other oil, gas, and energy service firms. Someone might invest in RSPG to get diversified exposure to the energy sector and potentially benefit from rising energy prices or industry growth. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy stocks, which can be very volatile and move sharply with oil and gas markets.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

RSPG is an all‑U.S. energy play, and its story is being written by a broad cast rather than a single giant. Texas Pacific Land has been the star of the show, rising sharply and giving the fund extra lift. APA and Occidental are also climbing, helped by solid operations and cleaner balance sheets. The big integrated names, Exxon and Chevron, are moving steadily higher but not sprinting, so they’re more like sturdy anchors than speedboats. With nearly everything tied to traditional oil and gas, the ETF is heavily concentrated in classic energy rather than renewables.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
APA5.31%$33.06M$13.65B156.85%
73
Outperform
Schlumberger4.90%$30.50M$77.94B52.88%
75
Outperform
Baker Hughes Company4.83%$30.08M$62.09B65.65%
76
Outperform
Coterra Energy4.80%$29.87M$25.42B32.79%
73
Outperform
Devon Energy4.74%$29.52M$29.70B69.29%
79
Outperform
Conocophillips4.74%$29.51M$150.92B41.86%
78
Outperform
Diamondback4.74%$29.50M$52.41B45.88%
81
Outperform
Occidental Petroleum4.73%$29.45M$57.73B53.89%
67
Neutral
Halliburton4.71%$29.34M$31.57B78.40%
72
Outperform
Targa Resources4.65%$28.94M$52.22B48.62%
74
Outperform

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
100.40
Positive
100DMA
90.87
Positive
200DMA
83.38
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.33
Positive
RSI
45.25
Neutral
STOCH
20.53
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 106.68, equal to the 50-day MA of 100.40, and equal to the 200-day MA of 83.38, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 1.33 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 20.53 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$619.49M0.40%
74
Outperform
$908.21M0.40%
70
Outperform
$767.73M0.57%
72
Outperform
$609.26M0.38%
73
Outperform
$172.90M0.60%
72
Outperform
$118.84M0.29%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
102.85
35.67
53.10%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement