RSPG - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:74Outperform

Price Target:―

RSPG, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven by strong energy leaders like Baker Hughes, Texas Pacific Land, and Williams, which benefit from robust financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and generally supportive technical trends. Major holdings such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Targa Resources also add strength through solid cash generation and strategic projects, though concerns around revenue growth, cash flow, leverage, and some bearish or overvalued technical signals in names like Kinder Morgan and Occidental Petroleum slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk is its concentrated exposure to the energy sector, which can make the ETF more sensitive to commodity price swings and industry-specific downturns.

Positive Factors

Strong Recent Performance

The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.

Strong-Performing Top Holdings

Many of the largest positions, including major energy service and oil companies, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.

Equal-Weight Energy Exposure

By spreading investments relatively evenly across many energy stocks, the ETF avoids relying too heavily on just one or two giants in the sector.

Negative Factors

Single-Sector Concentration

Almost all of the fund is invested in energy stocks, so its performance is highly sensitive to swings in the energy market.

U.S.-Only Geographic Focus

With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.

Moderately High Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM533.16M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.72

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateNov 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.32%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume128,030

30 Day Avg. Volume83,448

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

95.53

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering23

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RSPG Summary

RSPG is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It invests in U.S. energy companies and gives each stock a similar weight, instead of letting the biggest companies dominate. Well-known holdings include Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other oil, gas, and energy service firms. Someone might invest in RSPG to get diversified exposure to the energy sector and potentially benefit from rising energy prices or industry growth. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in energy stocks, which can be very volatile and move sharply with oil and gas markets.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

RSPG is an all‑U.S. energy play, and its story is being written mostly by oilfield service and integrated giants. Schlumberger, Halliburton, and Baker Hughes have been rising, giving the fund a strong tailwind as drilling and energy technology stay in demand. Exxon Mobil and Chevron are steadier leaders, adding stability even as their momentum looks a bit softer. On the other side, pipeline and infrastructure names like Kinder Morgan and Williams are more mixed, occasionally losing steam and keeping overall gains from looking even stronger.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
SLB	Schlumberger	5.11%	$27.37M	$72.34B	20.11%	75 Outperform
XOM	Exxon Mobil	4.99%	$26.73M	$596.31B	32.36%	74 Outperform
TPL	Texas Pacific Land	4.94%	$26.46M	$24.02B	-19.43%	76 Outperform
CVX	Chevron	4.92%	$26.40M	$356.19B	18.57%	71 Outperform
BKR	Baker Hughes Company	4.92%	$26.36M	$55.30B	21.35%	76 Outperform
HAL	Halliburton	4.86%	$26.08M	$28.21B	28.82%	72 Outperform
KMI	Kinder Morgan	4.83%	$25.91M	$67.83B	10.95%	68 Neutral
WMB	Williams Co	4.68%	$25.12M	$82.14B	21.34%	76 Outperform
TRGP	Targa Resources	4.62%	$24.75M	$43.14B	2.12%	74 Outperform
OXY	Occidental Petroleum	4.58%	$24.56M	$44.72B	-2.70%	67 Neutral

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

82.05

Positive

100DMA

79.97

Positive

200DMA

76.67

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

2.13

Negative

RSI

74.29

Negative

STOCH

80.34

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 84.53, equal to the 50-day MA of 82.05, and equal to the 200-day MA of 76.67, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 2.13 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 74.29 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.34 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RSPG	―	―	$533.16M	0.40%	―
TPYP	―	―	$746.15M	0.40%	―
FCG	―	―	$506.13M	0.57%	―
IEO	―	―	$458.19M	0.38%	―
FXN	―	―	$268.04M	0.62%	―
FTXN	―	―	$106.20M	0.60%	―

Performance Comparison

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

89.40

11.78

15.18%

TPYP

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund

―

FCG

First Trust Natural Gas ETF

―

IEO

iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

―

FXN

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund

―

FTXN

First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents