tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
$86.00
The overall rating of the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) suggests it is a solid investment option with a balanced mix of strong and moderate-performing holdings. Top contributors like Exxon Mobil and Baker Hughes stand out due to their robust financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and positive earnings call sentiment, which strengthen the fund's rating. However, holdings like Marathon Petroleum and Expand Energy face challenges such as high expenses, valuation concerns, and market volatility, which may slightly weigh on the ETF's overall score. Investors should also consider the fund's concentration in the energy sector, which could expose it to risks tied to fluctuations in oil and gas markets.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Marathon Petroleum and Valero Energy, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Focused Sector Exposure
The ETF's concentration in the energy sector allows investors to benefit from targeted growth in a high-performing industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.4%, the fund offers relatively low costs compared to many specialized ETFs.
Negative Factors
Sector Over-Concentration
The ETF is heavily concentrated in the energy sector, which increases vulnerability to industry-specific risks.
Mixed Performance Among Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Diamondback and Texas Pacific Land, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall returns.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little exposure to international markets.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPG Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) focuses on the energy sector within the S&P 500, using an equal-weight strategy to give all included companies the same importance. This means it provides balanced exposure to a variety of energy-related businesses, from traditional oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil to newer players in the industry. Investors might consider RSPG for diversification and the potential growth of the energy sector, which is a key part of the global economy. However, it’s important to note that this ETF is heavily tied to the energy market, which can be volatile and influenced by factors like oil prices and geopolitical events.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF is firing on all cylinders, with standout performances from Valero Energy and Marathon Petroleum driving gains thanks to strong operational efficiency and strategic initiatives. EQT is also rising steadily, buoyed by robust financial results and bullish momentum. However, Diamondback Energy and Targa Resources are dragging the fund slightly, with bearish trends and leverage concerns weighing on their outlook. With its exclusive focus on U.S. energy stocks, the ETF offers a balanced exposure across traditional oil and gas players and emerging energy leaders, making it a dynamic yet sector-concentrated choice for investors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Expand Energy5.31%$21.88M$27.39B15.65%
70
Neutral
Halliburton5.09%$20.97M$21.73B-19.16%
72
Outperform
EQT4.97%$20.46M$35.59B24.19%
81
Outperform
Valero Energy4.88%$20.09M$52.90B23.09%
75
Outperform
Coterra Energy4.71%$19.40M$19.61B-6.80%
73
Outperform
Marathon Petroleum4.67%$19.26M$57.30B20.28%
70
Outperform
Diamondback4.67%$19.25M$41.96B-20.97%
74
Outperform
Targa Resources4.65%$19.15M$36.61B-17.74%
71
Outperform
Baker Hughes Company4.64%$19.12M$48.23B10.46%
78
Outperform
Exxon Mobil4.64%$19.10M$493.75B-3.87%
75
Outperform

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
78.65
Positive
100DMA
77.14
Positive
200DMA
75.83
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.73
Positive
RSI
52.24
Neutral
STOCH
23.94
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 79.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 78.65, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.83, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.73 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 23.94 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$408.93M0.40%
72
Outperform
$700.75M0.40%
69
Neutral
$430.13M0.38%
72
Outperform
$415.96M0.57%
69
Neutral
$267.12M0.62%
71
Outperform
$108.41M0.60%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
79.93
-2.21
-2.69%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement