tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RSPG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
RSPG, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF, has a solid overall rating, suggesting it holds generally strong, well-managed energy companies with reasonable growth and income potential. Standout holdings like Oneok, Diamondback Energy, ConocoPhillips, Devon Energy, and EOG Resources support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, attractive valuations, and positive earnings outlooks. However, names like Valero Energy and Marathon Petroleum introduce some caution due to valuation pressures, technical weaknesses, and sector-specific headwinds, and the fund’s focus on the energy sector means it is heavily exposed to swings in energy prices and industry conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating favorable recent momentum in its strategy.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including major energy producers and service companies, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Equal-Weight Energy Exposure
By spreading similar weights across many energy stocks rather than concentrating in just a few giants, the ETF reduces reliance on any single company within the sector.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
With all its assets in the energy sector, the fund is highly sensitive to swings in oil and gas markets and lacks diversification across other industries.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
The ETF invests only in U.S. companies, so it does not benefit from diversification across different countries or regions.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may be higher than some broad-market or cheaper index alternatives.

RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPG Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, focusing only on U.S. energy companies. Instead of letting the biggest firms dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, spreading your money more evenly across the sector. It holds well-known names like ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum. Someone might invest in this ETF to bet on the long-term demand for energy and to get diversified exposure to many energy companies at once. A key risk is that it is concentrated in the energy sector, which can be very volatile and move sharply with oil and gas prices.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.

RSPG Top 10 Holdings

RSPG is a pure U.S. energy play, and its story right now is all about midstream and refiners. Targa Resources is one of the fund’s key engines, with a rising trend that helps offset weakness in names like EQT and Texas Pacific Land, which have been lagging lately. Refining giants Valero and Marathon Petroleum are quietly powering ahead, giving the ETF a steady tailwind even as pipeline players Kinder Morgan and Williams look more mixed. With nearly all its weight in traditional energy, this fund lives and dies by the fossil-fuel cycle.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Texas Pacific Land5.28%$27.61M$24.49B3.17%
76
Outperform
Valero Energy5.05%$26.40M$70.17B77.86%
69
Neutral
Expand Energy4.98%$26.06M$20.81B-28.73%
71
Outperform
Williams Co4.92%$25.75M$89.43B23.92%
76
Outperform
Marathon Petroleum4.92%$25.74M$70.91B48.42%
66
Neutral
Kinder Morgan4.90%$25.61M$70.28B14.81%
68
Neutral
EQT4.86%$25.44M$31.72B-12.68%
76
Outperform
Phillips 664.72%$24.70M$66.61B39.15%
73
Outperform
Oneok4.72%$24.67M$53.57B8.06%
82
Outperform
TechnipFMC4.64%$24.28M$25.98B97.39%
80
Outperform

RSPG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
103.16
Negative
100DMA
102.25
Negative
200DMA
91.05
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-1.76
Positive
RSI
39.86
Neutral
STOCH
28.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 100.27, equal to the 50-day MA of 103.16, and equal to the 200-day MA of 91.05, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -1.76 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.86 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPG.

RSPG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$519.55M0.40%
74
Outperform
$853.04M0.40%
71
Outperform
$570.40M0.59%
71
Outperform
$515.77M0.38%
73
Outperform
$384.29M0.63%
73
Outperform
$159.32M0.60%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
97.44
23.75
32.23%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
IEO
iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
FXN
First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement