RSPG - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, indicating favorable recent momentum in its strategy.
Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including major energy producers and service companies, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Equal-Weight Energy Exposure
By spreading similar weights across many energy stocks rather than concentrating in just a few giants, the ETF reduces reliance on any single company within the sector.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
With all its assets in the energy sector, the fund is highly sensitive to swings in oil and gas markets and lacks diversification across other industries.
U.S.-Only Geographic Focus
The ETF invests only in U.S. companies, so it does not benefit from diversification across different countries or regions.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may be higher than some broad-market or cheaper index alternatives.
RSPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM561.43M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.44
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.99%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume116,524
30 Day Avg. Volume134,862
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
122.25Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RSPG Summary
The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, focusing only on U.S. energy companies. Instead of letting the biggest firms dominate, it gives each stock a similar weight, spreading your money more evenly across the sector. It holds well-known names like ConocoPhillips and Occidental Petroleum. Someone might invest in this ETF to bet on the long-term demand for energy and to get diversified exposure to many energy companies at once. A key risk is that it is concentrated in the energy sector, which can be very volatile and move sharply with oil and gas prices.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (Ticker: RSPG) has an expense ratio of 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the ETF uses an equal-weight strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track traditional market-cap weighted indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) could benefit from rising energy demand, advancements in renewable energy technologies, and favorable government policies supporting the energy sector. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating oil and gas prices, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that impact energy consumption. Its focus on U.S.-based energy companies and equal-weight strategy provides diversification but also exposes it to sector-specific volatility.
RSPG Top 10 Holdings
RSPG is an all‑U.S. energy play, and its equal‑weight approach means no single giant calls the shots. Recent strength is coming from midstream and services names like Targa Resources, Valero, and APA, which have been rising on solid cash flows and upbeat outlooks. Halliburton and Schlumberger are also pulling their weight, though their momentum looks a bit steadier than spectacular. Kinder Morgan and Williams are more mixed, offering dependable dividends but less punch. Overall, the fund is tightly tied to traditional oil and gas, with little diversification beyond the energy patch.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schlumberger | 5.92% | $33.26M | $83.72B | 54.76% | 75 Outperform | |
| Marathon Petroleum | 5.54% | $31.12M | $76.14B | 58.64% | 66 Neutral | |
| APA | 5.34% | $30.03M | $13.00B | 76.20% | 73 Outperform | |
| Diamondback | 5.25% | $29.50M | $53.90B | 24.03% | 81 Outperform | |
| Targa Resources | 5.02% | $28.23M | $57.82B | 55.94% | 74 Outperform | |
| Oneok | 4.99% | $28.07M | $56.20B | 8.17% | 82 Outperform | |
| Valero Energy | 4.85% | $27.25M | $75.90B | 92.88% | 69 Neutral | |
| EOG Resources | 4.82% | $27.10M | $72.72B | 9.08% | 78 Outperform | |
| Conocophillips | 4.81% | $27.03M | $140.54B | 20.65% | 78 Outperform | |
| Baker Hughes Company | 4.79% | $26.93M | $62.98B | 61.73% | 76 Outperform |
RSPG Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
104.79
Negative
101.47
Positive
90.11
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.31
Positive
47.84
Neutral
37.51
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPG, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 105.65, equal to the 50-day MA of 104.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 90.11, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 37.51 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSPG.
RSPG Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
104.15
28.67
37.98%
FTXN
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
―
―
―
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
―
―
―
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
―
―
―
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
―
―
―
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents