RPV - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV)

Rating:66Neutral

Price Target:―

RPV’s rating suggests it is a solid but not outstanding value-focused ETF, with its quality driven by several reasonably strong holdings in traditional industries. Standouts like Ford, General Motors, and Tyson Foods support the fund through attractive valuations, solid cash flow or earnings performance, and generally positive market sentiment, while names such as Dow and Centene, which face profitability, leverage, and cash flow challenges, likely weigh on the overall assessment. The main risk factor is the fund’s tilt toward cyclical, economically sensitive sectors like autos, chemicals, and agriculture, which can be pressured during economic slowdowns.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings Performance

Most of the largest positions have shown strong or steady gains this year, which has helped support the ETF’s recent performance.

Broad Sector Diversification

The fund spreads its investments across many sectors such as health care, financials, consumer stocks, energy, and materials, which helps reduce the impact if any one area struggles.

Solid Recent Returns

The ETF has delivered positive performance over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating recent momentum in its value-focused strategy.

Negative Factors

High U.S. Concentration

With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers very limited geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low for an index-based ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

Exposure to Cyclical and Value-Sensitive Sectors

Significant weights in financials, consumer cyclical, energy, and materials mean the ETF can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and shifts away from value stocks.

RPV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM1.78B

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.66

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateMar 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.3%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P 500/Citigroup Pure Value

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume185,160

30 Day Avg. Volume201,770

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

119.51

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering123

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RPV Summary

The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) follows the S&P 500 Pure Value Index, focusing on large U.S. companies that look cheap based on basic financial measures. It holds a mix of well-known names like Ford and CVS Health, along with other established businesses in health care, financials, consumer goods, and more. Someone might invest in RPV if they believe undervalued, steady companies will perform well over time and want broad diversification beyond just tech stocks. A key risk is that value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the price can go up and down with market cycles.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a niche index and focuses on value stocks, which require more active management compared to broad market passive ETFs.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) could benefit from a strong economic recovery, as its focus on undervalued large-cap companies in sectors like health care, financials, and consumer defensive may attract investors seeking stability and growth. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact financial and cyclical sectors, while regulatory changes in health care or energy could pose risks to some of its top holdings. The ETF's U.S. focus also makes it sensitive to domestic economic and policy shifts.

RPV Top 10 Holdings

RPV is leaning hard into classic value territory, with U.S. names in health care, financials, and old-line industrials and consumer businesses steering the ship. Bunge, Dow, and Archer Daniels Midland have been rising and now act as key engines for the fund, helped by steady demand in agriculture and materials. Centene and Molina add a health-care tilt with more mixed but recently improving momentum. On the flip side, Ford, GM, and CVS are more like sputtering cylinders, occasionally firing but not yet giving the ETF a smooth ride.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
BG	Bunge Global	2.50%	$44.38M	$23.55B	73.29%	66 Neutral
MOS	Mosaic Co	2.19%	$38.90M	$9.34B	13.30%	65 Neutral
DOW	Dow Inc	2.01%	$35.69M	$22.66B	-20.71%	49 Neutral
ADM	Archer Daniels Midland	1.96%	$34.78M	$32.49B	47.93%	64 Neutral
F	Ford Motor	1.95%	$34.64M	$55.25B	46.75%	71 Outperform
TSN	Tyson Foods	1.83%	$32.50M	$22.07B	8.83%	69 Neutral
CNC	Centene	1.82%	$32.44M	$21.18B	-25.31%	58 Neutral
GM	General Motors	1.77%	$31.52M	$75.63B	70.12%	73 Outperform
SWR	Smurfit Westrock	1.75%	$31.07M	£20.08B	-7.98%	―
CI	Cigna	1.70%	$30.14M	$77.50B	-4.59%	72 Outperform

RPV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

106.98

Positive

100DMA

103.03

Positive

200DMA

97.79

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

1.83

Negative

RSI

63.84

Neutral

STOCH

73.32

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RPV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 110.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 106.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 97.79, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.83 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 73.32 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RPV.

RPV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RPV	―	―	$1.78B	0.35%	―
PVAL	―	―	$8.81B	0.55%	―
VOOV	―	―	$6.20B	0.07%	―
JAVA	―	―	$5.99B	0.44%	―
DFLV	―	―	$5.25B	0.22%	―
IWX	―	―	$3.63B	0.20%	―

Performance Comparison

RPV

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

112.67

22.75

25.30%

PVAL

Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF

―

VOOV

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF

―

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

―

DFLV

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

―

IWX

iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents