Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RILA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as Oracle, Palantir, and Amphenol, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF invests across multiple sectors like Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Health Care, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund's expense ratio of 0.5% is competitive for an actively managed ETF, helping investors keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
With nearly 98% of its holdings in U.S. companies, the ETF lacks exposure to international markets, limiting diversification.
Overweight in Technology
The ETF's heavy allocation to Technology at over 42% increases vulnerability to downturns in this sector.
Mixed Short-Term Performance
The ETF's one-month performance has been slightly negative, indicating short-term volatility despite longer-term gains.
RILA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM42.89M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.50%
Beta1.07
IssuerIndexperts
Inception DateJan 02, 2025
Dividend Yield0.04%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume5,101
30 Day Avg. Volume9,674
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
13.81Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering172
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RILA Summary
The Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (Ticker: RILA) is designed for investors looking to tap into fast-growing companies across the entire market. It focuses on sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and healthcare, with top holdings including well-known names like Nvidia and Tesla. This ETF aims to provide strong growth potential by investing in innovative and high-performing companies, making it a great choice for those seeking to diversify their portfolio with growth-focused assets. However, since it heavily invests in technology and growth sectors, its performance can be more volatile and sensitive to market swings.
How much will it cost me?The Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (Ticker: RILA) has an expense ratio of 0.5%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on high-growth sectors and companies that require more research and management compared to passively managed ETFs. While the cost is higher, it reflects the ETF's strategy to target aggressive growth opportunities.
What would affect this ETF?The Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF (RILA) could benefit from continued innovation and expansion in technology and consumer cyclical sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-focused companies, particularly those in technology and communication services. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting major U.S.-based firms like Nvidia, Tesla, and Meta Platforms may also influence the ETF's performance.
RILA Top 10 Holdings
The Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF leans heavily into technology, with names like Nvidia and Broadcom driving performance thanks to their focus on AI and data center expansion. Tesla and Palantir are also rising stars, benefiting from strong growth narratives in electric vehicles and AI solutions. However, Meta and Netflix are holding the fund back, with mixed signals and bearish trends dampening their momentum. With a clear tilt toward U.S.-based tech and innovation, this ETF is a bet on the future, though investors should keep an eye on valuation risks in some of its top holdings.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom | 4.65% | $2.00M | $1.66T | 45.74% | 76 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 4.55% | $1.95M | $1.61T | 5.04% | 73 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 4.51% | $1.94M | $4.60T | 34.94% | 76 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 4.00% | $1.72M | $1.01T | 34.68% | 72 Outperform | |
| Palantir Technologies | 3.47% | $1.49M | $462.70B | 135.65% | 74 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.36% | $1.45M | $2.48T | 1.35% | 71 Outperform | |
| Amphenol | 3.21% | $1.38M | $167.84B | 91.35% | 78 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 3.08% | $1.32M | $1.68T | 9.41% | 76 Outperform | |
| Oracle | 2.95% | $1.27M | $561.24B | 13.96% | 66 Neutral | |
| Netflix | 2.87% | $1.23M | $427.25B | 0.31% | 73 Outperform |
RILA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
11.67
Positive
11.61
Positive
10.99
Positive
Market Momentum
<0.01
Negative
55.59
Neutral
90.83
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RILA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 11.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 11.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 10.99, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of <0.01 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 90.83 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RILA.
RILA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
11.76
1.59
15.63%
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
―
―
―
HGRO
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
―
―
―
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
―
―
―
SEMG
Suncoast Select Growth ETF
―
―
―
RSMV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF 1Shs
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents