RFV - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

Rating:67Neutral

Price Target:―

RFV, the Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong holdings like Lear, Brighthouse Financial, TD SYNNEX, and NOV, which bring robust financial performance, reasonable or attractive valuations, and generally positive technical trends and outlooks. These strengths are partly offset by weaker names such as Olin and PBF Energy, where financial challenges, low profitability, and cautious technical and valuation signals weigh on the fund, and investors should also note the risk that several holdings face margin and cash flow pressures that could add volatility.

Positive Factors

Solid Recent Performance

The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating positive recent momentum.

Broad Sector Diversification

Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, financials, technology, energy, and industrials, which helps reduce reliance on any single part of the economy.

Several Strong Top Holdings

A number of the largest positions, such as Arrow Electronics, PBF Energy, Olin, and HF Sinclair, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.

Negative Factors

High U.S. Concentration

Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited geographic diversification outside the United States.

Meaningful Exposure to Cyclical Sectors

Large weights in consumer cyclical, financial, and energy stocks may make the fund more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.

Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings

Some key positions, including Concentrix, Brighthouse Financial, Lithia Motors, and Civitas Resources, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.

RFV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM294.79M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.97

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateMar 01, 2006

Dividend Yield2.07%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume7,536

30 Day Avg. Volume8,274

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

157.00

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering101

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RFV Summary

RFV is the Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF, which follows the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index. It invests mainly in medium‑sized U.S. companies that look cheap based on their stock price, focusing on sectors like consumer, financials, and energy. Some of its larger holdings include Concentrix and Arrow Electronics. An investor might choose RFV to diversify beyond big-name large caps and to seek long-term growth from mid-sized companies that may be undervalued. A key risk is that mid-cap value stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down with the overall market.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a niche index and focuses on mid-cap value stocks, which require more active management compared to broad market ETFs. It’s still considered reasonable for its specialized strategy.

What would affect this ETF?The RFV ETF, which focuses on U.S. mid-cap value stocks, could benefit from economic growth that boosts consumer spending and industrial activity, positively impacting sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively affect its Financial and Energy sector holdings, while regulatory changes or supply chain disruptions might impact top holdings like HF Sinclair and Cleveland-Cliffs.

RFV Top 10 Holdings

RFV is leaning hard into U.S. mid-cap value, with a noticeable tilt toward economically sensitive areas like consumer cyclical, financials, and energy. Tech distributors Avnet and Arrow Electronics have been rising, acting as quiet engines for the fund’s recent momentum, while Lear and NOV add steady support from industrial and energy corners. On the flip side, Concentrix has been lagging and Brighthouse Financial looks more mixed, occasionally throwing sand in the gears. Overall, performance is being driven by a handful of improving value names rather than any single dominant giant.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
AVT	Avnet	2.98%	$8.65M	$5.00B	30.23%	67 Neutral
PBF	PBF Energy	2.94%	$8.53M	$4.91B	109.53%	55 Neutral
ARW	Arrow Electronics	2.90%	$8.42M	$7.26B	38.51%	64 Neutral
CNXC	Concentrix	2.32%	$6.73M	$2.03B	-25.16%	69 Neutral
LEA	Lear	2.19%	$6.35M	$5.98B	24.37%	75 Outperform
DINO	HF Sinclair Corporation	2.17%	$6.31M	$10.17B	81.44%	68 Neutral
BHF	Brighthouse Financial	2.00%	$5.81M	$3.44B	11.02%	74 Outperform
OLN	Olin	1.95%	$5.67M	$2.70B	1.76%	52 Neutral
SNX	TD SYNNEX Corporation	1.79%	$5.20M	$12.74B	23.70%	73 Outperform
CHRD	Chord Energy	1.72%	$5.00M	$7.09B	17.74%	76 Outperform

RFV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

134.50

Negative

100DMA

130.92

Negative

200DMA

127.38

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-1.79

Positive

RSI

30.99

Neutral

STOCH

17.48

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RFV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 135.14, equal to the 50-day MA of 134.50, and equal to the 200-day MA of 127.38, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -1.79 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 30.99 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 17.48 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RFV.

RFV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RFV	―	―	$294.79M	0.35%	67 Neutral
IMCV	―	―	$990.42M	0.06%	70 Outperform
AVMV	―	―	$508.09M	0.20%	72 Outperform
NUMV	―	―	$419.12M	0.31%	70 Neutral
XMVM	―	―	$412.92M	0.39%	72 Outperform
TMVE	―	―	$285.33M	0.55%	67 Neutral

Performance Comparison

RFV

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

126.58

17.45

15.99%

IMCV

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

―

AVMV

Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF

―

NUMV

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

―

XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

―

TMVE

Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents