tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RFG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RFG

Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
RFG, the Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong growth-focused holdings with healthy business trends and positive outlooks. Standouts like Medpace Holdings, Woodward, TechnipFMC, and Rambus support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, upbeat earnings commentary, and generally favorable technical trends, even if valuations look rich in places. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker names such as AeroVironment and Echostar, which face financial and valuation challenges, and by the risk that many holdings share similar growth-style risks like high valuations and occasional overbought or bearish technical signals.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings With Strong Gains
Several of the largest positions, such as Hecla Mining, AeroVironment, Celsius, and Rambus, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, with meaningful exposure to industrials, health care, and technology, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher-Than-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which can modestly reduce net returns over time compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Mid-Cap Growth and Sector Tilt Risks
The focus on mid-cap growth stocks and sizable weights in cyclical areas like industrials and consumer sectors can make the fund more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.

RFG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RFG Summary

The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) tracks the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth Index, focusing on medium‑sized U.S. companies expected to grow faster than average. It holds a mix of industrial, health care, and technology stocks, including names like Celsius Holdings and Rambus. Investors might consider RFG if they want growth potential from companies that are larger and more established than small caps but still have room to expand, helping diversify a stock portfolio. A key risk is that growth-focused mid-cap stocks can be more volatile and may fall sharply during market downturns.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on mid-cap growth stocks, requiring more research and strategy compared to passively managed ETFs. It’s designed for investors seeking targeted exposure to companies with strong growth potential.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) could benefit from economic growth and innovation within sectors like Industrials, Health Care, and Technology, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as growth stocks often become less attractive in such environments, or if economic uncertainty impacts mid-cap companies more heavily than larger firms. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions could also influence the performance of its top holdings.

RFG Top 10 Holdings

RFG is leaning hard into U.S. mid-cap growth, with a noticeable tilt toward industrials, health care, and tech names that are doing much of the heavy lifting. Rambus is one of the fund’s clear bright spots, riding strong AI-related momentum, while Hecla Mining and TechnipFMC are also rising and giving the portfolio an extra boost from materials and energy. Medpace and Halozyme keep the health care engine humming, though their gains look steadier than spectacular. On the flip side, Talen Energy is losing steam and quietly tugging on returns, with AeroVironment and Celsius showing more mixed, stop-and-go performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Medpace Holdings2.15%$6.53M$16.41B66.83%
79
Outperform
Halozyme2.15%$6.52M$8.43B26.61%
73
Outperform
Celsius Holdings2.12%$6.45M$13.53B110.09%
71
Outperform
Hecla Mining Company2.12%$6.43M$15.09B296.48%
74
Outperform
AeroVironment2.04%$6.20M$13.90B54.53%
52
Neutral
Rambus2.03%$6.17M$12.25B84.73%
78
Outperform
TechnipFMC2.01%$6.09M$22.54B85.42%
80
Outperform
Woodward1.92%$5.82M$19.03B71.57%
79
Outperform
Echostar1.83%$5.56M$32.59B309.33%
57
Neutral
Talen Energy Corp1.71%$5.21M$15.92B57.11%
60
Neutral

RFG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
53.74
Positive
100DMA
52.45
Positive
200DMA
50.31
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.70
Positive
RSI
47.63
Neutral
STOCH
19.70
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RFG, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.80, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.74, and equal to the 200-day MA of 50.31, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.70 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.63 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 19.70 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RFG.

RFG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$312.23M0.35%
$505.67M0.70%
$397.08M0.31%
$141.38M0.60%
$141.05M0.80%
$140.92M0.85%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RFG
Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF
54.96
5.37
10.83%
FNY
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement