REGL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Resilient Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Diversified Sector Mix
Holdings spread across financials, industrials, utilities, real estate, and several other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration in Financials
A large tilt toward financial stocks means the ETF could be more sensitive to problems in that sector.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper ETFs.
REGL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.76B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.57
IssuerProShares
Inception DateFeb 03, 2015
Dividend Yield2.22%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume48,169
30 Day Avg. Volume52,410
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
101.13Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering64
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
REGL Summary
REGL is an ETF that follows the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, which focuses on mid-sized U.S. companies that have raised their dividends for at least 15 years in a row. It holds a mix of businesses across financials, industrials, utilities, and more, including names like Westlake Corporation and Ryder System. Someone might invest in REGL to seek a balance of growth potential from mid-sized companies and steady income from regular dividend increases. A key risk is that the value of mid-cap stocks and their dividends can still go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 you invest. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on mid-cap companies with a strong history of increasing dividends for at least 15 years, requiring more research and oversight. It may be worth the cost if you value its unique strategy and focus on dividend growth.
What would affect this ETF?The ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) could benefit from stable economic growth in the U.S., as its focus on financially resilient mid-cap companies with consistent dividend growth aligns well with investor demand for income and stability. However, rising interest rates or economic downturns could negatively impact dividend-paying sectors like utilities and financials, which make up a significant portion of the ETF's holdings. Additionally, regulatory changes in key sectors such as energy and healthcare may influence the performance of some top holdings.
REGL Top 10 Holdings
REGL is powered by a crew of steady, dividend-focused U.S. mid-caps, with industrials and financials clearly at the helm. Littelfuse has been a standout, rising strongly this year and giving the fund a helpful tailwind, while names like Cabot, Reliance Steel, Ryder System, and Applied Industrial Technologies have also been climbing, reinforcing the industrial tilt. On the flip side, Chemed has been more mixed lately, losing a bit of steam and modestly holding back returns. Overall, the ETF leans into durable, domestically focused dividend growers rather than flashy high-tech winners.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemed | 1.88% | $32.71M | $5.79B | -20.94% | 68 Neutral | |
| Cabot | 1.80% | $31.36M | $4.74B | 21.63% | 66 Neutral | |
| Hanover Insurance | 1.78% | $31.11M | $6.92B | 17.94% | 77 Outperform | |
| UMB Financial | 1.75% | $30.46M | $10.11B | 34.65% | 77 Outperform | |
| Applied Industrial Technologies | 1.73% | $30.24M | $12.49B | 45.74% | 74 Outperform | |
| Littelfuse | 1.73% | $30.15M | $12.13B | 118.90% | 76 Outperform | |
| Ryder System | 1.72% | $29.98M | $10.19B | 72.38% | 73 Outperform | |
| Commerce Bancshares | 1.72% | $29.97M | $7.98B | -5.75% | 73 Outperform | |
| Silgan Holdings | 1.72% | $29.90M | $4.40B | -24.19% | 68 Neutral | |
| Unum Group | 1.71% | $29.79M | $14.38B | 13.13% | 64 Neutral |
REGL Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
88.99
Positive
88.79
Positive
86.18
Positive
Market Momentum
0.96
Negative
61.84
Neutral
84.66
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For REGL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 89.47, equal to the 50-day MA of 88.99, and equal to the 200-day MA of 86.18, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.96 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.84 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 84.66 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for REGL.
REGL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
91.62
9.84
12.03%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
FMDE
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
―
―
―
XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
―
―
―
DON
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents