RECS - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS)

Rating:72Outperform

Price Target:―

RECS, the Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by large positions in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, which benefit from strong financial performance and long-term growth in areas such as AI, cloud, and services. Additional support comes from Alphabet’s strong profitability and growth investments, along with positive momentum from Wells Fargo. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker spots like Booking Holdings, which faces leverage and valuation concerns, and there is a notable risk from the fund’s heavy tilt toward a handful of large technology-related companies.

Positive Factors

Low Expense Ratio

The fund charges relatively low fees, which helps investors keep more of their returns over time.

Broad Sector Diversification

Holdings spread across many sectors, including technology, financials, health care, and consumer stocks, help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.

Large Asset Base

The ETF manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support better trading liquidity and fund stability for investors.

Negative Factors

Heavy U.S. Concentration

With the vast majority of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.

Top Holdings Under Pressure

Several of the largest positions, including major technology names, have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on the fund’s returns.

High Exposure to Technology

A large tilt toward the technology sector means the fund may be more sensitive to swings in tech stocks than a more evenly balanced portfolio.

RECS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM5.10B

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.15%

Beta0.98

IssuerColumbia

Inception DateSep 25, 2019

Dividend Yield1.16%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedBeta Advantage Research Enhanced US Equity Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume617,912

30 Day Avg. Volume738,015

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

49.07

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering366

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RECS Summary

The Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is a fund that tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced US Equity Index, focusing mainly on large U.S. companies across many sectors. It holds big, well-known names like Apple and Nvidia, along with other leaders in technology, finance, health care, and more. Someone might invest in RECS to get broad, long-term stock market growth in a single, diversified investment, instead of picking individual stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily invested in large U.S. stocks, especially tech, so its value can rise and fall significantly with the overall stock market and technology sector.

How much will it cost me?The Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, tracking an index rather than relying on active stock picking.

What would affect this ETF?The Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS), with its focus on large-cap U.S. companies, could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings. However, potential risks include rising interest rates or economic slowdowns that may negatively impact consumer spending and financial stocks, which are also key components of the fund. Regulatory changes affecting major holdings like Nvidia, Apple, or Meta Platforms could further influence performance.

RECS Top 10 Holdings

RECS is leaning heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Nvidia and Apple acting as the main engines: Nvidia keeps climbing on the AI wave, while Apple has perked up recently after a softer stretch. Microsoft, though, is losing steam, weighing on the fund as its recent performance has turned more sluggish. Alphabet and Meta are more of a mixed bag, offering long-term promise but choppy near-term moves. Outside tech, steady strength from defensive names like Procter & Gamble and a rising Exxon Mobil adds some balance to this tech-centric story.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
NVDA	Nvidia	8.58%	$425.73M	$4.45T	58.45%	76 Outperform
AAPL	Apple	8.46%	$419.85M	$3.75T	21.98%	79 Outperform
MSFT	Microsoft	6.58%	$326.51M	$2.98T	6.10%	79 Outperform
GOOG	Alphabet Class C	2.86%	$141.86M	$3.67T	84.06%	82 Outperform
META	Meta Platforms	2.66%	$132.03M	$1.61T	8.05%	76 Outperform
PG	Procter & Gamble	2.44%	$121.06M	$349.76B	-10.73%	69 Neutral
XOM	Exxon Mobil	1.87%	$92.72M	$639.72B	41.28%	74 Outperform
GOOGL	Alphabet Class A	1.74%	$86.42M	$3.67T	86.50%	85 Outperform
WFC	Wells Fargo	1.68%	$83.22M	$232.19B	9.92%	80 Outperform
BKNG	Booking Holdings	1.66%	$82.18M	$133.59B	-1.81%	63 Neutral

RECS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

40.95

Negative

100DMA

40.70

Negative

200DMA

39.18

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.36

Positive

RSI

31.59

Neutral

STOCH

18.69

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RECS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.57, equal to the 50-day MA of 40.95, and equal to the 200-day MA of 39.18, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.36 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 31.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.69 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RECS.

RECS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RECS	―	―	$5.10B	0.15%	72 Outperform
MGC	―	―	$9.32B	0.05%	74 Outperform
QQQI	―	―	$9.11B	0.68%	75 Outperform
PRF	―	―	$8.89B	0.34%	72 Outperform
RWL	―	―	$8.26B	0.39%	71 Outperform
QYLD	―	―	$8.25B	0.60%	75 Outperform

Performance Comparison

RECS

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

39.26

6.13

18.50%

MGC

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF

―

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF

―

PRF

Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF

―

RWL

Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF

―

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents