tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

QQQH - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QQQH

Neos Nasdaq 100 Hedged Equity Income Etf (QQQH)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
QQQH’s rating suggests it is a solid-quality ETF, largely driven by heavyweight positions in leaders like Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet, which benefit from strong financial performance, growth in AI and cloud, and generally positive technical trends. These strengths are slightly tempered by holdings such as Amazon, Tesla, and Broadcom, where high valuations, mixed technical signals, and cash flow or growth-expectation risks introduce more uncertainty. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in large U.S. technology and internet companies, which can make performance more sensitive to that sector’s cycles and regulatory or valuation pressures.
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Tech Giants
The ETF’s largest positions include many of the most established and influential technology and growth companies, which have historically driven much of the Nasdaq 100’s strength.
Broad Sector Diversification Within Growth Areas
While technology is the largest slice, the fund also holds meaningful exposure to communication services, consumer cyclical, and several other sectors, helping spread risk across different parts of the growth economy.
Significant Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support trading liquidity and help keep the ETF operating efficiently for investors.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in a Few Mega-Cap Stocks
A large share of the portfolio is tied up in a small number of big tech names, so weakness in these companies can have an outsized impact on the ETF.
Recent Weakness in Several Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, including major technology and growth stocks, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which has weighed on the fund’s overall results.
Higher-Than-Average Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee for an index-based strategy, which can gradually reduce net returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.

QQQH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QQQH Summary

QQQH is an ETF that focuses on large U.S. companies in the Nasdaq 100, with an added options strategy designed to generate extra income and help reduce some downside risk. It is heavily invested in technology and communication services, holding well-known names like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google). Someone might consider QQQH if they want exposure to leading growth companies while also seeking regular income from their investment. A key risk is that it is heavily dependent on tech-related stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the technology sector and overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Neos Nasdaq 100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (Ticker: QQQH) has an expense ratio of 0.68%, meaning you’ll pay $6.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed and uses a sophisticated strategy to generate income and manage risk.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF, heavily focused on U.S. large-cap technology and communication services companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these sectors, as well as favorable economic conditions such as low interest rates or strong consumer demand. However, it may face challenges from regulatory scrutiny on big tech, rising interest rates that could impact growth stocks, or broader economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and corporate earnings.

QQQH Top 10 Holdings

QQQH is essentially a U.S. mega-cap tech and consumer story, with Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla setting the tone. Lately, the usual tech titans—Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla—have been losing steam, acting as a drag on the fund, while Nvidia’s performance has been more mixed despite its AI buzz. On the brighter side, Amazon and especially Alphabet have been rising, helping to offset some of that weakness. Costco adds a steady, defensive U.S. retail engine, but overall the ETF is heavily hitched to Big Tech’s ups and downs.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia8.78%$31.67M$4.23T51.99%
76
Outperform
Apple7.79%$28.11M$4.06T18.94%
79
Outperform
Microsoft6.09%$21.98M$3.08T-0.28%
79
Outperform
Amazon5.01%$18.07M$2.49T-1.35%
71
Outperform
Meta Platforms4.02%$14.51M$1.69T-1.77%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A3.89%$14.05M$4.02T64.60%
85
Outperform
Tesla3.64%$13.12M$1.52T7.58%
73
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.63%$13.10M$4.02T64.03%
82
Outperform
Walmart3.10%$11.18M$1.02T26.73%
78
Outperform
Broadcom3.05%$11.00M$1.46T44.01%
76
Outperform

QQQH Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
53.98
Negative
100DMA
53.53
Negative
200DMA
51.36
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.02
Positive
RSI
38.55
Neutral
STOCH
27.96
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QQQH, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 54.25, equal to the 50-day MA of 53.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 51.36, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.02 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.55 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.96 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for QQQH.

QQQH Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$360.78M0.68%
$900.29M0.29%
$812.24M0.46%
$803.94M0.18%
$791.66M0.76%
$770.03M0.35%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QQQH
Neos Nasdaq 100 Hedged Equity Income Etf
53.31
4.92
10.17%
NBCR
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
DSPY
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy
FTQI
First Trust Hedged BuyWrite Income ETF
BALI
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement