tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

QQLV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QQLV

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
QQLV, the Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several high-quality, stable companies like PepsiCo, Honeywell, and Costco, which bring strong financial performance, healthy cash flow, and supportive earnings call commentary. Additional support comes from defensive names such as Exelon and Coca-Cola Europacific Partners, which add stability despite some leverage and regional risks. The main factors that hold the rating back are weaker contributors like Xcel Energy and Mondelez, where high leverage, cash flow challenges, and bearish technical trends introduce added risk, along with some overvaluation concerns across several holdings.
Positive Factors
Resilient Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions, including well-known defensive and quality companies, have shown strong or steady performance so far this year, supporting the fund’s returns.
Defensive Sector Mix
Heavy exposure to Industrials, Consumer Defensive, and Utilities can help smooth out returns during market volatility compared with more growth-heavy tech funds.
Low-Volatility Focus With Reasonable Fee
The ETF’s low-volatility strategy aims to reduce big price swings, and its expense ratio is moderate for a specialized, rules-based fund.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
Despite a positive year-to-date result, the fund has shown weak performance over the last three months, which may signal near-term headwinds.
High U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. stocks, investors get limited diversification benefits from international markets.
Sector and Holding Concentration Risk
A significant share of assets is clustered in a few sectors and top holdings, so problems in those areas could have an outsized impact on the ETF.

QQLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QQLV Summary

The Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) follows the Nasdaq-100 Low Volatility Index, focusing on large, well-established companies from the Nasdaq-100 that have had smoother price movements in the past. It holds familiar names like Costco and Honeywell, and invests across several sectors including industrials, consumer staples, and technology. Someone might consider QQLV if they want stock market growth potential but prefer a somewhat steadier ride than a typical tech-heavy Nasdaq fund. A key risk is that it still owns stocks, so its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (Ticker: QQLV) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it follows a specialized strategy to minimize volatility by carefully selecting stocks from the Nasdaq-100 Index.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF could benefit from stable economic conditions and growth in defensive sectors like Consumer Defensive and Utilities, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes affecting large-cap companies in the U.S. could negatively impact its performance, especially in sectors like Technology and Industrials. The ETF's focus on low-volatility stocks may help cushion against broader market downturns but could limit gains during strong market rallies.

QQLV Top 10 Holdings

QQLV is leaning into a defensive, low-drama mix of U.S. large caps, with a clear tilt toward industrials, consumer staples, and utilities rather than flashy tech. Costco, Monster Beverage, and Honeywell are doing the heavy lifting, with rising share prices helping power the fund’s steady climb. On the defensive side, utilities like Exelon and American Electric Power are quietly supporting stability, even if their momentum is more muted. ADP and Coca-Cola Europacific Partners are lagging a bit, acting more like ballast than engines for returns.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Linde5.84%$229.92K$224.60B5.25%
66
Neutral
American Electric Power5.10%$200.89K$70.28B27.60%
69
Neutral
Exelon5.08%$200.17K$49.59B13.14%
67
Neutral
Costco4.89%$192.49K$452.07B-4.98%
72
Outperform
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners4.74%$186.78K£32.83B17.21%
74
Outperform
Honeywell International4.68%$184.17K$153.25B19.05%
77
Outperform
Xcel Energy4.65%$183.01K$48.26B18.92%
61
Neutral
PepsiCo4.62%$181.87K$226.78B15.73%
78
Outperform
CSX4.57%$179.83K$76.00B22.48%
78
Outperform
Mondelez International4.55%$179.13K$80.23B2.91%
62
Neutral

QQLV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
24.29
Positive
100DMA
24.29
Positive
200DMA
24.55
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.06
Positive
RSI
56.35
Neutral
STOCH
51.03
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QQLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 24.49, equal to the 50-day MA of 24.29, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.55, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.06 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 56.35 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 51.03 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QQLV.

QQLV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.89M0.25%
$99.17M0.60%
$98.52M0.70%
$95.89M0.79%
$93.76M0.30%
$88.34M0.32%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
24.62
0.17
0.70%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
BCUS
Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
RWLC
Rayliant Quantitative Developed Market Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement