tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PSL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PSL

Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
PSL, the Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its biggest holdings—like Costco, Church & Dwight, BJ’s Wholesale Club, and US Foods—show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and growth initiatives that support the fund’s quality. However, some key positions such as Kroger, Philip Morris, Altria, and ADM face issues like high leverage, profitability or margin pressures, bearish technical trends, and valuation concerns, which weigh on the fund’s rating and highlight risks tied to specific companies within the consumer staples sector.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Several of the largest positions, including well-known consumer staples companies, have shown strong gains so far this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Defensive Sector Focus
Heavy exposure to consumer defensive stocks can provide more stability during market downturns because people tend to keep buying everyday essentials.
Solid Year-to-Date Return
The fund’s year-to-date performance has been positive, indicating that its momentum-based approach in consumer staples has recently worked in investors’ favor.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee for a sector-focused fund, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Sector Concentration Risk
With most of its assets in consumer defensive stocks, the fund is heavily tied to the fortunes of a single sector, which can hurt performance if that area falls out of favor.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all holdings are in U.S. companies, so investors get little benefit from international diversification.

PSL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PSL Summary

PSL is an ETF that follows the Dorsey Wright Consumer Staples index, focusing on companies that sell everyday essentials like food, drinks, and household products. It picks stocks showing strong recent performance, so it blends the stability of consumer staples with a momentum, trend-following approach. Well-known holdings include Costco and Procter & Gamble. Someone might invest in PSL to get diversified exposure to steady, defensive companies with some growth potential. A key risk is that it is concentrated in consumer staples, so it can still go up and down with that sector and the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the ETF is actively managed, focusing on momentum-driven investments within the consumer staples sector. Active management typically involves more research and trading, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The ETF's focus on consumer staples, a sector known for resilience during economic downturns, could benefit from steady demand for essential goods regardless of market conditions. Positive trends such as increased consumer spending or innovation within top holdings like Costco and Celsius Holdings may drive growth. However, rising interest rates or inflation could negatively impact consumer purchasing power, and regulatory changes affecting companies like Philip Morris might pose risks.

PSL Top 10 Holdings

PSL is leaning hard into U.S. consumer staples, with grocery and big-box names setting the tone. Kroger has been one of the fund’s quiet heroes, rising steadily alongside US Foods as demand for everyday essentials stays firm. Costco and Casey’s General Stores are also pulling their weight, though their recent momentum has cooled a bit. On the flip side, Monster Beverage has been losing fizz lately, acting as a drag. Overall, the ETF is tightly tied to defensive, U.S.-focused consumer names rather than flashy growth stories.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Casey's General5.24%$4.62M$27.24B66.07%
68
Neutral
Church & Dwight4.37%$3.86M$21.98B-14.28%
72
Outperform
Costco4.33%$3.82M$442.13B3.26%
72
Outperform
US Foods Holding3.95%$3.48M$20.03B35.40%
74
Outperform
Philip Morris3.80%$3.35M$244.91B0.74%
61
Neutral
Kroger Company3.67%$3.24M$43.21B4.86%
56
Neutral
Altria Group3.48%$3.07M$109.48B14.64%
64
Neutral
Procter & Gamble3.38%$2.98M$334.87B-14.99%
69
Neutral
Bj's Wholesale Club Holdings3.30%$2.92M$12.27B-17.71%
71
Outperform
Archer Daniels Midland3.29%$2.91M$34.82B50.86%
64
Neutral

PSL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
110.80
Negative
100DMA
106.07
Positive
200DMA
107.56
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.90
Negative
RSI
45.69
Neutral
STOCH
92.76
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PSL, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 108.87, equal to the 50-day MA of 110.80, and equal to the 200-day MA of 107.56, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.90 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 45.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.76 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PSL.

PSL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$88.30M0.60%
69
Neutral
$93.84M0.50%
55
Neutral
$88.16M0.61%
69
Neutral
$44.94M0.15%
70
Outperform
$32.43M0.29%
67
Neutral
$18.67M0.60%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
108.56
4.77
4.60%
RIET
Hoya Capital High Dividend Yield ETF
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
GXPS
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF
PSCC
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF
FTXG
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement