Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
POWR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Ishares U.S. Power Infrastructure Etf (POWR)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several major holdings, like Marathon Petroleum and Reliance Industries, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Global Exposure
The ETF invests in companies across multiple countries, providing diversification beyond the U.S. market.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low compared to many specialized ETFs, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration
Over 90% of the fund is allocated to the energy sector, making it highly sensitive to fluctuations in energy markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some key positions, like EOG Resources and ConocoPhillips, have lagged in year-to-date performance, dragging down potential gains.
Heavy U.S. Focus
More than half of the portfolio is concentrated in U.S. companies, limiting exposure to other global markets.
POWR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM74.24M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta0.55
IssueriShares
Inception DateJan 31, 2012
Dividend Yield7.66%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume21,171
30 Day Avg. Volume25,518
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
27.31Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering67
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
POWR Summary
The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (Ticker: FILL) focuses on companies in the global energy sector, particularly those involved in oil, gas, and consumable fuels. It tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Index, giving investors exposure to major energy producers like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. This ETF could be a good choice for someone looking to diversify their portfolio with energy stocks or capitalize on the long-term demand for traditional energy resources. However, it’s important to note that the ETF’s performance is closely tied to the energy market, which can be volatile depending on global oil and gas prices.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is passively managed but focuses on a specific sector, requiring more specialized tracking of energy companies globally.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) could benefit from rising global energy demand, particularly in emerging markets, and higher oil and gas prices driven by geopolitical tensions or supply constraints. However, it may face challenges from regulatory shifts toward renewable energy, potential economic slowdowns reducing energy consumption, and volatility in commodity prices. Its heavy reliance on major oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil and Chevron makes it sensitive to sector-specific trends and global energy policies.
POWR Top 10 Holdings
The iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF leans heavily into utilities and industrials, with names like NextEra Energy and Quanta Services shaping its trajectory. While NextEra Energy has shown steady long-term growth, recent momentum has cooled, creating a drag on the fund. On the flip side, Quanta Services is rising thanks to strong earnings and a growing backlog, offering a bright spot. GE Vernova’s bullish momentum adds further energy to the mix, while Eaton’s lagging performance in key segments tempers gains. Overall, the fund’s U.S.-focused portfolio is a bet on infrastructure and energy resilience, though mixed stock performance keeps its outlook balanced.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NextEra Energy | 6.10% | $4.46M | $165.55B | 17.97% | 71 Outperform | |
| Eaton | 5.66% | $4.13M | $124.51B | -6.11% | 75 Outperform | |
| Quanta Services | 5.57% | $4.07M | $63.01B | 31.80% | 78 Outperform | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 5.42% | $3.96M | $168.90B | 71.18% | 69 Neutral | |
| EQT | 4.79% | $3.50M | $31.88B | 6.53% | 76 Outperform | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 4.28% | $3.13M | $100.73B | 5.68% | 68 Neutral | |
| Southern Co | 4.07% | $2.98M | $96.04B | 7.26% | 68 Neutral | |
| First Solar | 3.88% | $2.84M | $26.43B | 30.13% | 75 Outperform | |
| Duke Energy | 3.88% | $2.83M | $90.83B | 10.82% | 70 Outperform | |
| Expand Energy | 3.65% | $2.67M | $24.21B | 2.10% | 71 Outperform |
POWR Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
23.97
Negative
23.81
Negative
22.90
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.10
Positive
39.59
Neutral
27.19
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For POWR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.71, equal to the 50-day MA of 23.97, and equal to the 200-day MA of 22.90, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.10 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.19 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for POWR.
POWR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
POWR
Ishares U.S. Power Infrastructure Etf
23.24
1.07
4.83%
FITE
SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
―
―
―
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
INFR
ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
―
―
―
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents