POWR - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Ishares U.S. Power Infrastructure Etf (POWR)

Rating:70Outperform

Price Target:―

The ETF POWR, focused on U.S. power infrastructure, has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong holdings and some risks. Quanta Services (PWR) stands out as a key contributor due to its robust financial performance and increased revenue guidance, despite concerns about overvaluation. EQT also positively impacts the fund with its operational efficiency and bullish momentum. However, weaker holdings like Southern Co (SO), which faces bearish momentum and valuation concerns, may have slightly held back the ETF's rating. The main risk factor is the potential overvaluation of several holdings, which could limit future growth.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several major holdings, like Marathon Petroleum and Reliance Industries, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.

Global Exposure

The ETF invests in companies across multiple countries, providing diversification beyond the U.S. market.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low compared to many specialized ETFs, making it cost-effective for investors.

Negative Factors

Sector Concentration

Over 90% of the fund is allocated to the energy sector, making it highly sensitive to fluctuations in energy markets.

Underperforming Holdings

Some key positions, like EOG Resources and ConocoPhillips, have lagged in year-to-date performance, dragging down potential gains.

Heavy U.S. Focus

More than half of the portfolio is concentrated in U.S. companies, limiting exposure to other global markets.

POWR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM74.98M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.55

IssueriShares

Inception DateJan 31, 2012

Dividend Yield7.59%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedS&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index - Benchmark TR Net

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume26,312

30 Day Avg. Volume22,879

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

27.32

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering66

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

POWR Summary

The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (Ticker: FILL) focuses on companies in the global energy sector, particularly those involved in oil, gas, and consumable fuels. It tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Energy Producers Index, giving investors exposure to major energy producers like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. This ETF could be a good choice for someone looking to diversify their portfolio with energy stocks or capitalize on the long-term demand for traditional energy resources. However, it’s important to note that the ETF’s performance is closely tied to the energy market, which can be volatile depending on global oil and gas prices.

How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is passively managed but focuses on a specific sector, requiring more specialized tracking of energy companies globally.

What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF (FILL) could benefit from rising global energy demand, particularly in emerging markets, and higher oil and gas prices driven by geopolitical tensions or supply constraints. However, it may face challenges from regulatory shifts toward renewable energy, potential economic slowdowns reducing energy consumption, and volatility in commodity prices. Its heavy reliance on major oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil and Chevron makes it sensitive to sector-specific trends and global energy policies.

POWR Top 10 Holdings

The iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF leans heavily into utilities and industrials, with names like NextEra Energy and Quanta Services leading the charge. NextEra’s steady growth in renewable energy and Quanta’s rising backlog are bright spots, driving the fund’s performance. On the flip side, Eaton and Southern Co are lagging, weighed down by bearish momentum and operational challenges. The fund’s U.S.-focused portfolio reflects a clear bet on infrastructure and energy transformation, but mixed results from holdings like GE Vernova suggest some turbulence in the journey ahead.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
NEE	NextEra Energy	6.24%	$4.86M	$165.65B	10.98%	71 Outperform
PWR	Quanta Services	5.92%	$4.61M	$63.62B	29.92%	78 Outperform
GEV	GE Vernova Inc.	5.45%	$4.24M	$178.60B	92.11%	69 Neutral
ETN	Eaton	4.78%	$3.73M	$123.43B	-6.01%	75 Outperform
EQT	EQT	4.53%	$3.52M	$33.62B	25.31%	76 Outperform
CEG	Constellation Energy Corporation	4.33%	$3.37M	$110.99B	56.55%	68 Neutral
FSLR	First Solar	3.79%	$2.95M	$28.65B	46.38%	75 Outperform
SO	Southern Co	3.69%	$2.87M	$93.90B	2.92%	68 Neutral
DUK	Duke Energy	3.51%	$2.73M	$89.87B	6.72%	70 Outperform
EXE	Expand Energy	3.46%	$2.69M	$25.90B	14.62%	71 Outperform

POWR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

23.94

Negative

100DMA

23.70

Negative

200DMA

22.81

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.15

Positive

RSI

42.14

Neutral

STOCH

8.02

Positive

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For POWR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.96, equal to the 50-day MA of 23.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of 22.81, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.14 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.02 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for POWR.

POWR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
POWR	―	―	$74.98M	0.40%	―
CEPI	―	―	$82.99M	0.85%	―
RBLD	―	―	$18.49M	0.65%	―
INFR	―	―	$12.38M	0.59%	―
SIMS	―	―	$9.12M	0.45%	―
HWAY	―	―	$1.56M	0.29%	―

Performance Comparison

POWR

Ishares U.S. Power Infrastructure Etf

23.47

2.62

12.57%

CEPI

REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF

―

RBLD

First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF

―

INFR

ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF

―

SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

―

HWAY

Themes US Infrastructure ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents