PFM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown positive returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating steady recent momentum.
Strong Dividend-Focused Blue Chips
Top holdings include well-known, established companies like Broadcom, Walmart, Exxon Mobil, and Johnson & Johnson, several of which have delivered strong gains this year and support the fund’s dividend strategy.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, with meaningful exposure to technology, financials, health care, consumer defensive, and industrials, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several large positions such as Microsoft, Apple, Eli Lilly, JPMorgan, Visa, and Oracle have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for a passive ETF, which means more of the return is eaten up by fees over time.
PFM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM788.50M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.52%
Beta0.70
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateSep 15, 2005
Dividend Yield1.33%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume15,501
30 Day Avg. Volume18,738
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
64.63Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering433
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
PFM Summary
The Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) follows the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index, which focuses on U.S. companies that have raised their dividends for at least 10 years in a row. It holds a wide mix of businesses across the market, including well-known names like Microsoft, Apple, Walmart, and JPMorgan Chase. Someone might invest in this ETF to get a diversified portfolio of established companies that aim to grow their dividends over time, offering both income and potential growth. A key risk is that stock prices and dividend payments can still go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) has an expense ratio of 0.52%, meaning you’ll pay $5.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is passively managed but focuses on a specialized index of dividend-growing companies, which requires more curation than broader market ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) could benefit from continued growth in the technology and healthcare sectors, which are its largest exposures, as well as stable dividend payments from its top holdings like Apple and Microsoft. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact financial and consumer cyclical sectors, which also make up a significant portion of the ETF's portfolio. Additionally, regulatory changes affecting major companies in its top holdings, such as Visa or JPMorgan Chase, could pose risks to future performance.
PFM Top 10 Holdings
PFM leans heavily on U.S. dividend stalwarts, with tech and financials setting the tone. Eli Lilly has been a clear bright spot, helping drive gains alongside a rising JPMorgan and a resurgent Cisco that’s been on a strong run lately. On the flip side, Microsoft has been losing steam, and Apple’s recent wobble has taken a bit of shine off Big Tech’s contribution. Broadcom’s AI-fueled story remains a key engine, while Walmart’s mixed stretch shows that even steady retailers can occasionally stall in this all-U.S., dividend-focused lineup.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | 4.18% | $32.99M | $4.90T | 58.04% | 79 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 3.97% | $31.34M | $1.11T | 52.79% | 72 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 3.49% | $27.52M | $2.93T | -22.79% | 79 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 3.32% | $26.17M | $913.98B | 17.11% | 72 Outperform | |
| Walmart | 3.30% | $26.04M | $909.13B | 20.19% | 78 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.28% | $25.89M | $1.76T | 30.88% | 76 Outperform | |
| Visa | 2.19% | $17.25M | $675.57B | 2.72% | 70 Outperform | |
| Exxon Mobil | 2.18% | $17.22M | $610.73B | 36.74% | 74 Outperform | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 2.17% | $17.13M | $609.12B | 54.58% | 78 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 1.75% | $13.77M | $480.32B | -1.64% | 75 Outperform |
PFM Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
55.02
Positive
53.65
Positive
52.50
Positive
Market Momentum
0.30
Positive
58.93
Neutral
52.86
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PFM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.57, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.02, and equal to the 200-day MA of 52.50, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.30 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 58.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 52.86 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for PFM.
PFM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
55.96
8.12
16.97%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
―
―
―
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
―
―
―
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
―
―
―
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents