tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

OMFS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OMFS

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
OMFS, the Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF, earns a solid overall rating, reflecting generally strong underlying small-cap holdings with some pockets of weakness. High-quality positions like CareTrust REIT (CTRE) and Krystal Biotech (KRYS) support the fund’s standing through strong financial performance and strategic growth, while names such as Silicon Labs (SLAB) and Piper Sandler (PIPR) introduce some drag due to declining performance, bearish technical signals, or valuation concerns. The main risk factor is exposure to several holdings with potential overbought technical conditions and valuation pressures, which could increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, showing solid momentum in its recent returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including financials, health care, technology, real estate, and industrials, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as MYR Group, Silicon Laboratories, and Clear Secure, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited geographic diversification.
Sector Tilt Toward Financials and Real Estate
A large share of the portfolio is in financial and real estate stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to interest rate and credit market changes.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low for an ETF, meaning fees could modestly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.

OMFS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OMFS Summary

The Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is a fund that invests in smaller U.S. companies by tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It holds a wide mix of businesses, including financial firms, health care companies, technology names, and real estate owners like CareTrust REIT and Terreno Realty. Investors might consider OMFS if they want growth potential from small-cap stocks and diversification across many sectors, rather than betting on just a few companies. However, because it focuses on smaller firms, the share price can be more volatile and can go up and down sharply with changes in the market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multifactor strategy to adjust its portfolio dynamically, rather than passively tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?The OMFS ETF, focused on U.S. small-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and health care, which are key components of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more significantly. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in financials and industrials, could also influence its performance.

OMFS Top 10 Holdings

OMFS leans into U.S. small caps with a noticeable tilt toward financials and real estate, and that’s where much of the story starts. CareTrust REIT and Terreno Realty have been steady climbers, helping to pull the fund higher, while MYR Group’s recent slide has taken a bit of shine off earlier strong gains. In health care, Krystal Biotech has been a volatile but net positive force, and Clear Secure in tech has added momentum despite some choppiness. Overall, performance is being driven by a mix of rising niche players rather than any single dominant name.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
CareTrust REIT1.73%$4.92M$9.91B25.29%
80
Outperform
FirstCash1.43%$4.07M$8.85B55.36%
74
Outperform
MYR Group1.25%$3.55M$5.19B79.18%
76
Outperform
Terreno Realty1.21%$3.44M$7.62B30.67%
75
Outperform
Brinker International1.20%$3.41M$9.17B40.31%
70
Neutral
SSR Mining1.08%$3.06M$5.32B114.72%
Silicon Laboratories1.00%$2.86M$7.17B63.23%
56
Neutral
Clear Secure0.97%$2.76M$7.38B83.89%
77
Outperform
Piper Sandler0.92%$2.63M$5.39B-5.36%
67
Neutral
Moelis0.90%$2.56M$5.44B-1.18%
78
Outperform

OMFS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
52.00
Positive
100DMA
49.82
Positive
200DMA
47.52
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.12
Positive
RSI
54.68
Neutral
STOCH
45.87
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OMFS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.71, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.52, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.12 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.68 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 45.87 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OMFS.

OMFS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$284.45M0.39%
67
Neutral
$863.40M0.48%
72
Outperform
$725.51M0.42%
68
Neutral
$716.60M0.38%
67
Neutral
$705.00M0.09%
63
Neutral
$694.79M0.40%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
53.83
13.71
34.17%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement