Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
OMFS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Top Holdings Showing Strength
Most of the largest positions, such as Compass, Dana, and Herbalife, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including financials, industrials, health care, consumer cyclical, and technology, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited international diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may be higher than some cheaper index ETFs and can slightly reduce net returns over time.
Exposure to Volatile Smaller Companies
Because the ETF focuses on smaller U.S. stocks, investors face higher potential price swings and company-specific risk compared with large-cap funds.
OMFS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM271.68M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.39%
Beta0.92
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 08, 2017
Dividend Yield0.77%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedRussell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume12,556
30 Day Avg. Volume13,592
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
57.56Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering1666
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
OMFS Summary
OMFS is the Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF, which follows the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies (small caps) across many sectors like financials, industrials, health care, and technology. The fund holds lesser-known but real operating businesses such as Herbalife and ViaSat, and it shifts its mix based on factors like value and quality. Someone might invest in OMFS to seek long-term growth and diversification beyond large, well-known stocks. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multifactor strategy to adjust its portfolio dynamically, rather than passively tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?The OMFS ETF, focused on U.S. small-cap companies, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and health care, which are key components of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more significantly. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in financials and industrials, could also influence its performance.
OMFS Top 10 Holdings
OMFS is leaning into U.S. small caps with a quirky mix of industrials, energy, and niche growth names driving the story. ACM Research is one of the real engines here, rising on strong growth and innovation, while Terex, Dana, and Constellium are also pulling their weight as industrial and materials plays gain momentum. Herbalife has quietly turned into a bright spot, adding extra lift despite its balance-sheet baggage. On the flip side, Compass has been lagging, and Peabody Energy’s choppy path has kept the fund from really hitting full stride.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terex | 0.45% | $1.23M | $7.06B | 51.45% | 71 Outperform | |
| Dana Incorporated | 0.43% | $1.17M | $3.55B | 133.24% | 58 Neutral | |
| Compass | 0.38% | $1.03M | $6.55B | 2.59% | 61 Neutral | |
| Constellium | 0.37% | $1.02M | $3.34B | 109.39% | 64 Neutral | |
| Delek US Holdings | 0.32% | $871.97K | $2.53B | 196.56% | 49 Neutral | |
| Par Pacific Holdings | 0.32% | $866.33K | $2.39B | 270.79% | 67 Neutral | |
| Peabody Energy Comm | 0.30% | $805.28K | $3.91B | 157.37% | 61 Neutral | |
| Herbalife | 0.29% | $789.33K | $1.60B | 74.41% | 71 Outperform | |
| ViaSat | 0.28% | $753.43K | $5.95B | 350.05% | 56 Neutral | |
| Praxis Precision Medicines | 0.28% | $750.05K | $8.65B | 707.04% | 58 Neutral |
OMFS Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
47.08
Negative
45.49
Positive
43.40
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.06
Positive
38.28
Neutral
36.69
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OMFS, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 47.08, and equal to the 200-day MA of 43.40, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.06 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.28 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 36.69 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for OMFS.
OMFS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
45.95
9.27
25.27%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
―
―
―
GSSC
Goldman Sachs Activebeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
―
―
―
JHSC
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
EES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents