tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

MCOW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MCOW

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
MCOW, the Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because many of its top holdings like Medpace, Rambus, Mueller Industries, Graco, and DT Midstream show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and in several cases supportive technical trends and shareholder-friendly actions such as buybacks or dividend growth. Some positions such as Pure Storage, DocuSign, Manhattan Associates, and Lattice Semiconductor introduce caution due to bearish or mixed technical signals and concerns about high valuations, which temper the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that several key holdings appear potentially overvalued at the same time, which could increase the ETF’s sensitivity to market pullbacks.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns so far this year, showing resilience despite recent market ups and downs.
Leading Holdings Showing Solid Gains
Several of the largest positions, such as Medpace, Pure Storage, Rambus, Lattice Semiconductor, Mueller Industries, Graco, Curtiss-Wright, and DT Midstream, have posted strong or steady gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification Within U.S. Stocks
The fund spreads its investments across multiple sectors, including technology, industrials, health care, consumer-related areas, financials, energy, and materials, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has slipped over the last three months, which may signal near-term volatility or a pause in its earlier strength.
Underperforming Top Holdings
Some key positions like DocuSign and Manhattan Associates have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s returns if the trend continues.
Higher Expense Ratio for a Passive ETF
The fund’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an index-based ETF, which slightly reduces the net return that investors keep over time.

MCOW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MCOW Summary

MCOW is an ETF that follows the S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index, focusing on mid-sized U.S. companies with strong, steady cash flow. It holds a mix of sectors, with a big tilt toward technology and industrials, and includes well-known names like DocuSign and Pure Storage. Investors might consider MCOW if they want growth potential from mid-cap stocks while still aiming for financially solid businesses and broad diversification across industries. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward mid-cap and tech-related companies, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs, as it focuses on a niche strategy targeting mid-cap companies with strong free cash flow, which requires more specialized tracking.
What would affect this ETF?The MCOW ETF, with its focus on mid-cap companies in the U.S., could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the technology and industrial sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, as this could increase borrowing costs for mid-sized companies or if economic conditions weaken, impacting consumer spending and business investments. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions in technology or healthcare could also influence the ETF's performance.

MCOW Top 10 Holdings

MCOW is leaning heavily into U.S. mid-cap tech and industrial names, and that’s where most of the action is. Rambus and Lattice Semiconductor have been the real engines lately, riding strong momentum in chips and AI, while Medpace adds steady strength from the health care side. On the flip side, DocuSign has been losing steam, and Manhattan Associates has seen more mixed trading, both acting as small drags. With all holdings U.S.-based and tech-focused leaders up top, the fund’s story is very much a mid-cap, quality-growth America play.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Pure Storage4.31%$42.46K$23.97B13.62%
64
Neutral
Lattice Semiconductor3.54%$34.81K$13.30B46.46%
71
Outperform
Rambus3.53%$34.78K$11.23B63.62%
78
Outperform
Medpace Holdings3.18%$31.25K$12.66B33.38%
79
Outperform
DocuSign3.00%$29.52K$8.98B-47.02%
71
Outperform
Manhattan Associates2.92%$28.71K$8.56B-20.95%
75
Outperform
Graco2.67%$26.32K$15.45B8.18%
78
Outperform
Mueller Industries2.42%$23.82K$12.99B53.18%
78
Outperform
DT Midstream2.37%$23.29K$13.57B38.10%
78
Outperform
Curtiss-Wright2.28%$22.48K$25.47B123.73%
74
Outperform

MCOW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
19.98
Negative
100DMA
20.02
Negative
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.11
Positive
RSI
47.01
Neutral
STOCH
62.87
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MCOW, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 19.80, equal to the 50-day MA of 19.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 62.87 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for MCOW.

MCOW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$984.10K0.49%
$88.63M0.15%
$60.92M0.60%
$40.19M0.80%
$33.68M0.59%
$21.78M0.18%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MCOW
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
19.71
-0.50
-2.47%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
KMID
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF
MMID
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
STXM
Strive Mid-Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement