Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
LSAT - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Mix
Holdings spread across consumer, financial, industrial, technology, and several other sectors help reduce reliance on any single industry.
Focused but Not Overly Concentrated
The top 10 positions each have similar-sized weights, which keeps the fund focused while avoiding a single stock dominating the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges relatively high fees, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown weak results over the past one and three months, which may signal near-term performance pressure.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and only a small stake abroad, the fund offers limited geographic diversification.
LSAT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM59.69M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.99%
Beta0.66
IssuerLeaderShares
Inception DateOct 27, 2020
Dividend Yield1.83%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume5,571
30 Day Avg. Volume14,691
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
45.69Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering31
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
LSAT Summary
The Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is an actively managed fund that invests mainly in U.S. stocks across many sectors, following a “total market” theme rather than a single index. It uses a rules-based approach to pick companies it believes have strong value, momentum, and quality. Well-known holdings include homebuilder DR Horton and fertilizer producer CF Industries. Someone might consider LSAT for diversified stock exposure with a focus on long-term growth. However, it can go up and down with the overall stock market, and its active strategy may not always outperform.
How much will it cost me?The Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because LSAT is actively managed, using a tactical strategy to adjust its holdings based on market factors like value, momentum, and quality.
What would affect this ETF?The LSAT ETF, with its focus on the U.S. market and diverse sector exposure, could benefit from economic growth, particularly in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which thrive during periods of innovation and increased consumer spending. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like real estate and financials, while regulatory changes or shifts in consumer behavior may affect top holdings such as Monster Beverage and HP. The ETF’s tactical approach provides flexibility to adapt to market changes, but its performance may still be influenced by broader economic and sector-specific trends.
LSAT Top 10 Holdings
LSAT is leaning into U.S. industrials and cyclical names, with stocks like Allison Transmission, APi Group, and Carlisle quietly pulling the fund higher as their steady-to-rising trends reflect solid cash flows and disciplined execution. Homebuilders Toll Brothers and DR Horton are more of a mixed bag: Toll is still climbing, but DR Horton is wobbling a bit, hinting at some housing-market jitters. CF Industries and Iridium are also rising, giving the portfolio an extra boost, while overall the fund stays firmly anchored in North America with no big-tech giants dominating the stage.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iridium Communications | 4.26% | $2.57M | $2.43B | -26.75% | 71 Outperform | |
| DaVita | 4.17% | $2.52M | $9.95B | -5.38% | 59 Neutral | |
| Carlisle Companies | 4.05% | $2.44M | $17.09B | 14.32% | 70 Outperform | |
| Cf Industries Holdings | 3.91% | $2.36M | $14.76B | 14.77% | 72 Outperform | |
| Southwest Airlines | 3.90% | $2.35M | $25.11B | 68.79% | 66 Neutral | |
| Toll Brothers | 3.89% | $2.35M | $15.74B | 34.37% | 77 Outperform | |
| Allison Transmission Holdings | 3.80% | $2.29M | $9.80B | 12.66% | 71 Outperform | |
| SM Energy | 3.75% | $2.26M | $5.11B | -44.29% | 72 Outperform | |
| Halozyme | 3.73% | $2.25M | $9.34B | 36.28% | 73 Outperform | |
| Ferguson PLC | 3.72% | $2.24M | £37.42B | 31.53% | 65 Neutral |
LSAT Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
39.44
Positive
39.57
Positive
39.56
Positive
Market Momentum
0.24
Negative
56.79
Neutral
62.27
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LSAT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.50, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.44, and equal to the 200-day MA of 39.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.24 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.79 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 62.27 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LSAT.
LSAT Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
40.18
-0.37
-0.91%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
―
―
―
VAMO
Cambria Value & Momentum ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents