tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

LSAT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LSAT

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) has a solid overall rating, mainly driven by strong, well-run companies like APi Group and Toll Brothers, which show healthy financial performance, strategic growth plans, and supportive technical or earnings trends. Other sizable positions such as CF Industries, Allison Transmission, and Carlisle Companies also add strength through good profitability, cash flow, and reasonable valuations, though some show bearish or overbought technical signals. Weaker holdings like DaVita and Post Holdings, which face profitability, stability, and bearish trend challenges, slightly weigh on the fund, and investors should note the risk that several holdings share issues like bearish momentum or high leverage, which could increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Mix
Holdings spread across consumer, financial, industrial, technology, and several other sectors help reduce reliance on any single industry.
Focused but Not Overly Concentrated
The top 10 positions each have similar-sized weights, which keeps the fund focused while avoiding a single stock dominating the portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges relatively high fees, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown weak results over the past one and three months, which may signal near-term performance pressure.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and only a small stake abroad, the fund offers limited geographic diversification.

LSAT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LSAT Summary

The Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is an actively managed fund that invests mainly in U.S. stocks across many sectors, following a “total market” theme rather than a single index. It uses a rules-based approach to pick companies it believes have strong value, momentum, and quality. Well-known holdings include homebuilder DR Horton and fertilizer producer CF Industries. Someone might consider LSAT for diversified stock exposure with a focus on long-term growth. However, it can go up and down with the overall stock market, and its active strategy may not always outperform.
How much will it cost me?The Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has an expense ratio of 0.99%, which means you’ll pay $9.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because LSAT is actively managed, using a tactical strategy to adjust its holdings based on market factors like value, momentum, and quality.
What would affect this ETF?The LSAT ETF, with its focus on the U.S. market and diverse sector exposure, could benefit from economic growth, particularly in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which thrive during periods of innovation and increased consumer spending. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact sectors like real estate and financials, while regulatory changes or shifts in consumer behavior may affect top holdings such as Monster Beverage and HP. The ETF’s tactical approach provides flexibility to adapt to market changes, but its performance may still be influenced by broader economic and sector-specific trends.

LSAT Top 10 Holdings

LSAT is leaning into U.S. cyclicals, with names like Toll Brothers and Southwest Airlines helping drive the recent upswing as housing and travel sentiment improve. Industrial players such as Carlisle Companies and Allison Transmission are also pulling their weight, giving the fund a steady backbone tied to real-economy demand. On the flip side, DaVita and CF Industries look a bit more mixed, occasionally losing steam despite solid fundamentals. Overall, the ETF is U.S.-centric and tilted toward consumer cyclical, financial, and industrial stories rather than mega-cap tech giants.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Cf Industries Holdings4.86%$2.89M$17.06B50.17%
72
Outperform
SM Energy4.61%$2.74M$6.20B-5.12%
72
Outperform
Iridium Communications4.48%$2.66M$2.54B-19.29%
71
Outperform
DaVita4.29%$2.55M$10.19B-0.75%
59
Neutral
Allison Transmission Holdings3.84%$2.28M$9.68B21.77%
71
Outperform
Carlisle Companies3.57%$2.12M$14.43B5.66%
70
Outperform
Sun Communities3.56%$2.12M$16.68B3.88%
66
Neutral
APi Group3.52%$2.09M$18.49B77.12%
79
Outperform
Toll Brothers3.51%$2.09M$13.93B38.22%
77
Outperform
Post Holdings3.43%$2.04M$5.06B-8.10%
64
Neutral

LSAT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.59
Positive
100DMA
39.51
Positive
200DMA
39.65
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.09
Positive
RSI
46.25
Neutral
STOCH
61.47
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LSAT, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.08, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.59, and equal to the 200-day MA of 39.65, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 61.47 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for LSAT.

LSAT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$59.45M0.99%
67
Neutral
$98.42M0.89%
69
Neutral
$97.15M0.75%
69
Neutral
$92.73M0.85%
71
Outperform
$82.88M0.54%
76
Outperform
$82.05M0.52%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
39.48
0.45
1.15%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
SEPI
Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement