tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RFDA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RFDA

RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
RFDA’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not perfect, dividend-focused ETF, helped significantly by large positions in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Alphabet, which all show strong financial performance and promising long-term growth in areas like AI, cloud, and services. These strengths are partly offset by weaker names such as Clearway Energy and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, where mixed financial results, profitability challenges, and valuation concerns weigh on the overall picture. A key risk is the fund’s heavy concentration in a handful of large technology-related stocks, which can increase volatility if that sector faces a downturn.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Leading Technology Holdings
Several major technology names in the top holdings have delivered strong results, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Mix
Exposure to a range of sectors beyond technology, including financials, consumer, energy, and real estate, helps spread out risk across different parts of the U.S. economy.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
A large portion of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in that sector.
Mixed Top-Holding Performance
Some of the biggest positions, such as Apple and Microsoft, have recently lagged, which could weigh on future returns if the weakness continues.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which slightly reduces the net return that investors keep over time.

RFDA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RFDA Summary

RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) is an actively managed fund that invests in a wide range of U.S. stocks, with a focus on companies that pay dividends. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead follows a total U.S. market theme and adjusts its holdings over time. The fund is heavily invested in technology and owns well-known names like Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google). Someone might invest for a mix of growth and dividend income in one fund. A key risk is that it’s heavily tilted toward tech stocks, so its price can swing a lot with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has an expense ratio of 0.52%, meaning you’ll pay $5.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, which involves more frequent adjustments to the portfolio to respond to market trends. Active management typically comes with higher costs compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) could benefit from growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, especially with companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple driving innovation. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact dividend-paying stocks and sectors like financials and consumer cyclical, which are also key components of the ETF. Additionally, regulatory changes affecting large-cap tech companies may pose risks to its top holdings.

RFDA Top 10 Holdings

RFDA’s story is all about U.S. tech-powered dividends. Nvidia is clearly in the driver’s seat, with its AI-fueled rally giving the fund a strong tailwind, while Amazon and Alphabet add more growth punch with steadily rising share prices. Apple has perked up recently but is still shaking off earlier weakness, and Microsoft’s mixed stretch means it’s no longer the unquestioned star. Further down the list, solid rebounds in Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise help offset laggards, keeping this U.S.-only, tech-heavy dividend play firmly growth-tilted.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia4.25%$3.44M$5.06T99.22%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C3.62%$2.93M$4.15T114.58%
82
Outperform
Microsoft3.44%$2.78M$3.15T8.60%
79
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase2.93%$2.37M$831.44B28.13%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson2.93%$2.37M$547.64B45.05%
78
Outperform
International Business Machines2.62%$2.12M$218.03B-3.43%
79
Outperform
Conocophillips2.48%$2.01M$148.41B30.94%
78
Outperform
TSMC2.15%$1.74M$1.80T147.84%
81
Outperform
Caterpillar2.03%$1.64M$386.56B169.91%
76
Outperform
Citigroup2.01%$1.63M$219.47B89.13%
68
Neutral

RFDA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
64.40
Positive
100DMA
64.05
Positive
200DMA
62.54
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.19
Negative
RSI
69.34
Neutral
STOCH
78.31
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RFDA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 66.32, equal to the 50-day MA of 64.40, and equal to the 200-day MA of 62.54, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.34 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 78.31 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RFDA.

RFDA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$82.54M0.52%
71
Outperform
$95.88M0.89%
69
Neutral
$93.17M0.85%
71
Outperform
$93.06M0.75%
68
Neutral
$82.86M0.65%
62
Neutral
$65.47M0.72%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
68.28
16.54
31.97%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
VAMO
Cambria Value & Momentum ETF
FMCE
FM Compounders Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement