tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

IWP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IWP

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
IWP, the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong performers like Vertiv Holdings, Quanta Services, and Idexx Laboratories, which all show robust financial results, positive earnings commentary, and supportive technical trends despite somewhat high valuations. The fund also includes names such as Cloudflare and Vistra Energy, where profitability, leverage, and momentum challenges are more noticeable, which likely prevents the rating from being higher. A key risk factor is that several top holdings share issues like high leverage and potentially stretched valuations, which could increase the fund’s sensitivity to market downturns or rising interest rates.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Growth Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Howmet Aerospace, Vertiv, Carvana, and Quanta Services, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors—including consumer cyclical, technology, industrials, and health care—reducing the impact if any one industry struggles.
Large Asset Base
With a very high level of assets under management, the ETF benefits from strong investor interest and typically better trading liquidity.
Negative Factors
Recent Short-Term Weakness
The ETF has shown weak performance over the past one and three months, which may concern investors focused on short-term trends.
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering very limited geographic diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions like Royal Caribbean, Vistra, and Cloudflare have been lagging this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall performance.

IWP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IWP Summary

IWP is the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF, which follows the Russell Midcap Growth Index. It invests in medium-sized U.S. companies that are focused on growing, across areas like technology, healthcare, and consumer brands. Well-known holdings include Hilton Worldwide and Royal Caribbean. Someone might invest in IWP to seek long-term growth while spreading money across many mid-sized companies instead of picking individual stocks. A key risk is that growth-focused stocks can be more volatile, so the value of this ETF can go up and down significantly with the stock market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has an expense ratio of 0.23%, meaning you’ll pay $2.30 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it tracks a specific index focused on mid-cap growth companies, which may require more specialized management. Overall, it’s still considered a cost-effective option for accessing this niche market segment.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) could benefit from positive trends in sectors like technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary, which are known for innovation and growth potential. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth stocks, and economic slowdowns that could reduce consumer spending and business investment. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-based companies could also influence the ETF's performance.

IWP Top 10 Holdings

IWP’s story is all about U.S. mid-cap growth names, with a tilt toward tech, industrials, and consumer cyclicals. Howmet Aerospace and Vertiv are two of the fund’s key engines right now, both rising on solid earnings and upbeat outlooks. Quanta Services is also pulling its weight, adding steady momentum from the industrial side. On the flip side, Royal Caribbean and Vistra are losing steam, while Cloudflare has been dragging the fund with weaker recent trading. Overall, the ETF is driven by a handful of mid-cap growth leaders rather than mega-cap giants.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Royal Caribbean2.92%$595.08M$79.52B25.91%
67
Neutral
Howmet Aerospace2.79%$568.74M$84.77B64.03%
67
Neutral
Vertiv Holdings2.47%$503.88M$74.08B70.24%
77
Outperform
Hilton Worldwide Holdings2.27%$463.40M$68.87B16.55%
67
Neutral
Cencora2.15%$437.66M$68.19B36.23%
70
Neutral
Carvana Co1.93%$392.24M$89.20B75.22%
66
Neutral
Cloudflare1.88%$383.88M$64.76B35.50%
61
Neutral
Quanta Services1.84%$374.42M$71.77B56.30%
78
Outperform
Vistra Corp1.83%$373.39M$56.12B-7.78%
65
Neutral
Monolithic Power1.82%$371.74M$55.66B85.80%
75
Outperform

IWP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
138.58
Negative
100DMA
140.38
Negative
200DMA
137.21
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.03
Positive
RSI
43.72
Neutral
STOCH
25.91
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IWP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 139.97, equal to the 50-day MA of 138.58, and equal to the 200-day MA of 137.21, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 25.91 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for IWP.

IWP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$20.70B0.23%
$108.59B0.05%
$94.04B0.04%
$48.00B0.18%
$24.79B0.24%
$18.20B0.07%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
138.08
3.92
2.92%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P Midcap 400 ETF Trust
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement