tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

INDS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

INDS

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
INDS, the Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong industrial and storage REITs like Prologis and Eastgroup Properties, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and generally supportive technical trends. Other key holdings such as Rexford Industrial Realty and Segro also add strength through stable finances and strategic growth initiatives, though some positions like Extra Space Storage and CubeSmart face bearish technical signals and growth challenges that slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is the ETF’s concentration in industrial and storage real estate, which makes it sensitive to sector-specific and broader economic conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the recent market environment.
Leading Industrial REIT Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major industrial and storage real estate companies, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Global Industrial Real Estate Exposure
Holdings across the U.S., UK, Asia, and other regions provide international diversification within the industrial real estate theme.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Three Holdings
A large portion of the fund is invested in just three companies, which increases the impact that any weakness in these stocks can have on overall performance.
Sector Concentration in Real Estate
With most assets in the real estate sector, the ETF is highly sensitive to property market cycles, interest rates, and real estate-specific risks.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low, which means a noticeable portion of returns is used to cover ongoing costs.

INDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

INDS Summary

INDS is an ETF that follows the Solactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index, focusing on companies that own warehouses, storage facilities, and other industrial properties. Its holdings include well-known real estate names like Prologis and Public Storage, which benefit from growing e-commerce and the need for more distribution and storage space. Investors might consider INDS for targeted exposure to industrial real estate and global diversification across the U.S., UK, and other countries. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the real estate sector, so its value can rise or fall with property markets and interest rates.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (Ticker: INDS) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is specialized and focuses on actively managing investments in industrial REITs, which require more research and expertise. It’s designed to target a niche sector with growth potential, which can justify the higher cost.
What would affect this ETF?The INDS ETF could benefit from the continued growth of e-commerce and global supply chains, which drive demand for industrial properties like warehouses and distribution centers. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact the real estate sector, as higher borrowing costs and reduced consumer spending may affect industrial REITs' profitability and expansion plans.

INDS Top 10 Holdings

INDS is tightly focused on industrial and storage REITs, with Prologis and Segro acting as the main engines of recent gains as demand for logistics space keeps rising. Rexford and EastGroup are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum from U.S. industrial hubs. On the storage side, Public Storage and Extra Space Storage have been more mixed, occasionally losing steam and softening overall returns. While the fund is diversified across individual names, it’s clearly concentrated in industrial real estate, with a developed-markets tilt that’s mostly U.S. plus a dash of the U.K.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Public Storage15.87%$18.72M$60.45B16.15%
73
Outperform
Extra Space Storage14.41%$17.00M$32.67B8.45%
66
Neutral
Prologis14.25%$16.81M$137.67B37.01%
76
Outperform
Segro plc (REIT)5.68%$6.70M£13.06B49.41%
75
Outperform
Eastgroup Properties4.45%$5.25M$11.24B27.43%
78
Outperform
W. P. Carey Inc.4.22%$4.98M$16.77B10.34%
70
Neutral
Cubesmart3.78%$4.46M$9.43B5.34%
68
Neutral
First Industrial Realty3.48%$4.10M$9.02B36.05%
74
Outperform
Rexford Industrial Realty3.44%$4.06M$8.42B4.26%
76
Outperform
Terreno Realty3.02%$3.56M$7.62B30.67%
75
Outperform

INDS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
40.90
Positive
100DMA
39.90
Positive
200DMA
38.95
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.26
Positive
RSI
51.70
Neutral
STOCH
8.93
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For INDS, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 41.86, equal to the 50-day MA of 40.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.95, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 8.93 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for INDS.

INDS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$117.38M0.49%
68
Neutral
$952.23M0.13%
69
Neutral
$450.33M0.13%
70
Outperform
$374.09M0.49%
61
Neutral
$242.96M0.40%
57
Neutral
$204.90M0.68%
59
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
41.67
6.96
20.05%
PBPH
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil and Gas and Exploration and Production Index ETF
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement