INDS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its industrial real estate holdings.
Leading REIT Holdings Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, including major industrial and storage REITs, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Global Industrial Real Estate Exposure
While most assets are in the U.S., the fund also holds meaningful positions in markets like the UK, Singapore, Japan, and Canada, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in real estate, the ETF is heavily exposed to the ups and downs of the property market and interest rate changes.
Top Holdings Are Very Concentrated
A few large REITs make up a significant share of the portfolio, which increases the impact that problems at any one of these companies could have on the fund.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s ongoing fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
INDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM114.86M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.57
IssuerPacer
Inception DateMay 14, 2018
Dividend Yield3.55%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume7,274
30 Day Avg. Volume9,831
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
43.40Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering30
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
INDS Summary
INDS is an ETF that follows the Solactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index, focusing on industrial real estate companies around the world. It mainly holds industrial REITs that own warehouses, distribution centers, and storage facilities that support e-commerce and global shipping. Well-known holdings include Prologis and Public Storage. Someone might invest in INDS to get diversified exposure to the growing demand for logistics and storage space as online shopping and supply chains expand. A key risk is that it is concentrated in industrial real estate, so it can go up and down with that specific part of the property market.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (Ticker: INDS) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is specialized and focuses on actively managing investments in industrial REITs, which require more research and expertise. It’s designed to target a niche sector with growth potential, which can justify the higher cost.
What would affect this ETF?The INDS ETF could benefit from the continued growth of e-commerce and global supply chains, which drive demand for industrial properties like warehouses and distribution centers. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact the real estate sector, as higher borrowing costs and reduced consumer spending may affect industrial REITs' profitability and expansion plans.
INDS Top 10 Holdings
INDS is heavily anchored in industrial and storage REITs, with Prologis and EastGroup Properties doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been steadily rising on the back of strong leasing and logistics demand. Public Storage and Extra Space Storage are more of a mixed bag, with recent trading choppier even as their long-term stories stay intact. On the weaker side, Rexford Industrial and Stag Industrial have been lagging, acting like a small brake on returns. While the fund is mostly U.S.-focused, Segro adds a touch of developed-market exposure overseas.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prologis | 15.53% | $17.87M | $136.59B | 27.83% | 76 Outperform | |
| Public Storage | 14.86% | $17.10M | $53.31B | -4.51% | 73 Outperform | |
| Extra Space Storage | 14.52% | $16.71M | $31.85B | -8.28% | 66 Neutral | |
| W. P. Carey Inc. | 4.41% | $5.08M | $16.58B | 17.02% | 70 Neutral | |
| Segro plc (REIT) | 4.33% | $4.98M | £9.78B | 4.78% | 75 Outperform | |
| Eastgroup Properties | 4.33% | $4.98M | $10.85B | 14.15% | 78 Outperform | |
| Cubesmart | 3.71% | $4.27M | $9.10B | -9.06% | 68 Neutral | |
| Rexford Industrial Realty | 3.35% | $3.86M | $8.01B | -1.78% | 76 Outperform | |
| First Industrial Realty | 3.29% | $3.78M | $8.48B | 20.61% | 74 Outperform | |
| Stag Industrial | 2.88% | $3.32M | $7.24B | 2.00% | 75 Outperform |
INDS Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
39.05
Negative
39.12
Negative
37.88
Positive
Market Momentum
0.11
Positive
42.38
Neutral
50.24
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For INDS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.80, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.05, and equal to the 200-day MA of 37.88, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.38 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 50.24 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for INDS.
INDS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
39.09
3.43
9.62%
PBPH
Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF
―
―
―
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil and Gas and Exploration and Production Index ETF
―
―
―
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
―
―
―
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
―
―
―
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents