Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
INDS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially in storage and industrial REITs, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Global Real Estate Exposure
Holdings spread across the U.S., U.K., Japan, and other countries provide some geographic diversification within industrial real estate.
Solid Recent Year-to-Date Results
The ETF’s year-to-date performance has been positive, indicating it has generally held up well so far this year despite some short-term bumps.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in real estate, the fund is highly sensitive to conditions in the property market and interest rate changes.
Top Holdings Dominate the Portfolio
A few large positions make up a significant share of the ETF, which increases the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which slightly reduces the net return that investors keep over time.
INDS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM118.74M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.52
IssuerPacer
Inception DateMay 14, 2018
Dividend Yield3.39%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume14,596
30 Day Avg. Volume14,457
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
41.71Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering28
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
INDS Summary
INDS is an ETF that follows the Solactive GPR Industrial Real Estate Index and invests mainly in industrial real estate companies (REITs) that own warehouses, storage sites, and distribution centers. It holds well-known names like Prologis and Public Storage, which benefit from growing e-commerce and the need for modern logistics space. Someone might invest in INDS to gain targeted exposure to industrial real estate around the world, adding diversification beyond regular stocks and bonds. A key risk is that it is concentrated in one sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with changes in the real estate market and interest rates.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (Ticker: INDS) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, meaning you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is specialized and focuses on actively managing investments in industrial REITs, which require more research and expertise. It’s designed to target a niche sector with growth potential, which can justify the higher cost.
What would affect this ETF?The INDS ETF could benefit from the continued growth of e-commerce and global supply chains, which drive demand for industrial properties like warehouses and distribution centers. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact the real estate sector, as higher borrowing costs and reduced consumer spending may affect industrial REITs' profitability and expansion plans.
INDS Top 10 Holdings
INDS is heavily tilted toward industrial and storage REITs, with Extra Space Storage, Public Storage, and Prologis acting as the main engines. Extra Space and Public Storage have been rising this year but show some recent wobble, so they’re helping more than hurting overall. Prologis looks steadier, quietly supporting returns rather than stealing the spotlight. Smaller names like Rexford Industrial have been lagging lately, putting a mild drag on performance. While the fund is mostly U.S.-focused, Segro adds a touch of developed international exposure to this logistics-and-warehouses story.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extra Space Storage | 15.16% | $18.00M | $32.43B | -5.52% | 66 Neutral | |
| Public Storage | 15.02% | $17.83M | $52.71B | 0.99% | 73 Outperform | |
| Prologis | 14.80% | $17.57M | $132.15B | 14.99% | 76 Outperform | |
| Segro plc (REIT) | 4.96% | $5.89M | £10.74B | 8.59% | 75 Outperform | |
| W. P. Carey Inc. | 4.76% | $5.66M | $16.26B | 26.43% | 70 Neutral | |
| Eastgroup Properties | 4.08% | $4.84M | $10.18B | 6.30% | 78 Outperform | |
| Cubesmart | 3.59% | $4.27M | $8.92B | -6.42% | 68 Neutral | |
| Rexford Industrial Realty | 3.53% | $4.20M | $8.62B | -7.78% | 76 Outperform | |
| First Industrial Realty | 3.14% | $3.72M | $8.05B | 5.95% | 74 Outperform | |
| Stag Industrial | 2.86% | $3.40M | $7.27B | 8.56% | 75 Outperform |
INDS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
37.92
Positive
37.45
Positive
36.51
Positive
Market Momentum
0.51
Negative
64.93
Neutral
90.27
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For INDS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 39.00, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.92, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.51, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.51 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 90.27 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for INDS.
INDS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
40.04
4.11
11.44%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
―
―
―
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
―
―
―
FINX
Global X Fintech Etf
―
―
―
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
―
―
―
CRTC
Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents