IFRA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum.
Leading Infrastructure Companies
Several top holdings, including major industrial and utility names, have delivered strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Targeted Infrastructure Exposure
Heavy weights in utilities, industrials, and materials give focused exposure to U.S. infrastructure-related businesses that benefit from ongoing investment in this area.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Large allocations to utilities and industrials mean the fund is heavily tied to the fortunes of just a few sectors.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With almost all assets in U.S. companies and only a small stake abroad, the ETF offers little protection if the U.S. market weakens.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few significant positions have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on overall returns if the trend continues.
IFRA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM4.16B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.30%
Beta0.73
IssueriShares
Inception DateApr 03, 2018
Dividend Yield1.56%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume343,054
30 Day Avg. Volume337,042
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
67.75Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering161
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
IFRA Summary
The iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) follows the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index and focuses on companies that build and maintain America’s basic systems, like roads, bridges, railways, power lines, and utilities. It holds well-known names such as Caterpillar and NextEra Energy, along with railroads and power companies. Someone might invest in IFRA to benefit from long-term spending on U.S. infrastructure and to add diversification beyond just tech or broad market funds. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to infrastructure and utility stocks, so it can rise or fall with that specific sector.
How much will it cost me?The iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) has an expense ratio of 0.30%, meaning you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a specific sector, which requires more specialized management. Overall, it’s still considered a relatively low-cost option for gaining exposure to U.S. infrastructure companies.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) could benefit from increased government spending on infrastructure projects, such as roads, bridges, and energy networks, as well as growing demand for renewable energy and utilities. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for infrastructure companies, or economic slowdowns that reduce investment in large-scale projects. Its focus on U.S.-based utilities, industrials, and energy sectors makes it sensitive to regulatory changes and shifts in energy policy.
IFRA Top 10 Holdings
IFRA is firmly hitched to America’s infrastructure engine, with a heavy tilt toward U.S. utilities, industrials, and railroads. Caterpillar and Quanta Services are doing the heavy lifting, with both stocks rising as construction and grid projects stay busy. Rail names like Union Pacific and CSX are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum. On the flip side, utilities such as NextEra and Duke feel a bit sluggish, while Constellation Energy is losing steam, slightly dragging on returns. Overall, it’s a U.S.-centric bet on hard-hat growth and essential services.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar | 4.59% | $185.83M | $386.56B | 169.91% | 76 Outperform | |
| Union Pacific | 3.99% | $161.52M | $159.53B | 26.48% | 72 Outperform | |
| NextEra Energy | 3.93% | $159.02M | $198.69B | 43.27% | 71 Outperform | |
| Quanta Services | 3.70% | $149.89M | $93.49B | 119.28% | 78 Outperform | |
| CSX | 3.31% | $134.13M | $84.38B | 63.11% | 78 Outperform | |
| CRH plc | 3.05% | $123.64M | ― | ― | 76 Outperform | |
| Norfolk Southern | 2.81% | $113.76M | $78.27B | 43.82% | 75 Outperform | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 2.67% | $108.27M | $113.59B | 40.19% | 68 Neutral | |
| Southern Co | 2.65% | $107.38M | $105.39B | 3.33% | 68 Neutral | |
| Duke Energy | 2.50% | $101.08M | $99.04B | 5.32% | 70 Outperform |
IFRA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
58.85
Positive
57.07
Positive
54.27
Positive
Market Momentum
1.01
Negative
69.11
Neutral
81.29
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IFRA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 60.02, equal to the 50-day MA of 58.85, and equal to the 200-day MA of 54.27, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.01 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.11 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.29 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IFRA.
IFRA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
62.42
17.12
37.79%
THRO
Ishares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active Etf
―
―
―
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
―
―
―
JTEK
JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF
―
―
―
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
―
―
―
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents