tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GVLU - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GVLU

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU)

Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:
GVLU, the Gotham 1000 Value ETF, earns a solid rating because many of its largest positions, like Devon Energy, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Rogers Communications, combine strong operations, supportive technical trends, and generally attractive valuations that can support future growth. However, some holdings such as Transocean and Dollar General face profitability, leverage, or valuation concerns, and the fund’s heavy tilt toward a few energy and financially leveraged names adds risk if those sectors or companies run into trouble.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Mostly Positive Recent Performance
The ETF has shown generally strong recent returns over the year and in the last few months, suggesting its value strategy has been working in the current market.
Multiple Strong Individual Holdings
Several top positions, including companies in energy, health care, and packaging, have delivered strong gains, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are higher than many low-cost index ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns for buy-and-hold investors.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. economy.
Some Weak Top Holdings
A few of the largest positions, particularly in payments, communications, and insurance, have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on the fund if those stocks do not recover.

GVLU vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GVLU Summary

The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is an actively managed fund that looks for “value” stocks—companies the managers believe are trading for less than they’re really worth. It invests mainly in U.S. companies across many sectors, including health care, financials, and technology. Well-known holdings include Bristol-Myers Squibb and PayPal. An investor might choose this ETF to seek long-term growth while spreading money across many different industries instead of picking individual value stocks. A key risk is that these value stocks can stay out of favor for long periods, so the share price can go up and down with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has an expense ratio of 0.5%, meaning you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, which involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as its focus on undervalued stocks across sectors like Consumer Cyclical, Health Care, and Industrials may see growth if consumer spending and industrial activity rise. However, higher interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact value stocks, particularly in sectors like Financials and Consumer Defensive, as borrowing costs increase and consumer demand weakens. Regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges, such as stricter environmental policies affecting Energy holdings, may also influence performance.

GVLU Top 10 Holdings

GVLU’s story is classic value investing with a U.S.-centric twist: insurers like Allstate and White Mountains are quietly pulling their weight, with steady-to-rising performance helping to anchor returns. Health care name Bristol-Myers Squibb is also adding some lift, while industrial packaging player Sonoco has been a pleasant surprise, climbing on solid execution. On the flip side, PayPal looks more mixed, bouncing recently but still lagging over the longer stretch, and Rogers Communications has been losing steam. Overall, the fund leans toward financials and cyclicals rather than flashy growth tech.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Bristol-Myers Squibb0.52%$1.15M$119.87B19.23%
78
Outperform
California Resources Corp0.51%$1.13M$5.74B82.71%
71
Outperform
Devon Energy0.50%$1.10M$29.77B52.77%
79
Outperform
PayPal Holdings0.49%$1.10M$45.42B-23.35%
76
Outperform
Allstate0.49%$1.09M$54.97B9.62%
74
Outperform
Occidental Petroleum0.49%$1.09M$56.65B41.37%
67
Neutral
APA0.49%$1.08M$13.33B132.20%
73
Outperform
White Mountains Insurance Group0.49%$1.08M$5.60B28.98%
73
Outperform
TFI International0.48%$1.06MC$15.58B73.28%
63
Neutral
Rogers Communication0.48%$1.06M$19.56B43.31%
80
Outperform

GVLU Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
25.79
Positive
100DMA
25.67
Positive
200DMA
24.65
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.18
Positive
RSI
51.72
Neutral
STOCH
37.11
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GVLU, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.14, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.65, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 37.11 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GVLU.

GVLU Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$223.59M0.50%
70
Neutral
$804.28M0.13%
69
Neutral
$597.67M0.40%
75
Outperform
$514.39M0.28%
73
Outperform
$395.50M0.38%
70
Outperform
$288.38M0.60%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
26.09
4.95
23.42%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value Fund
BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement