GRNY - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Leading Growth Stocks in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as major chipmakers and technology firms, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, industrials, financials, consumer sectors, and more help reduce the impact if any one industry runs into trouble.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s management fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Concentrated in U.S. Market
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, including certain financial and brokerage stocks, have shown weaker or negative performance, which can drag on the fund’s results if the trend continues.
GRNY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM4.41B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta1.23
IssuerFundstrat
Inception DateNov 07, 2024
Dividend Yield0.07%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,229,115
30 Day Avg. Volume1,621,636
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
32.78Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering44
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GRNY Summary
GRNY is the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF, focused on big, established U.S. companies across many sectors like technology, finance, and industrials. It doesn’t track a traditional index, but instead follows a large-cap stock theme chosen by Fundstrat. Top holdings include well-known names such as JPMorgan Chase, American Express, and Eli Lilly. Investors might consider GRNY for growth potential and diversification across leading U.S. businesses in one investment. However, the fund is still a stock-based ETF, so its value can go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (Ticker: GRNY) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, aiming to strategically select large-cap stocks for potential growth and stability.
What would affect this ETF?The GRNY ETF, with its strong focus on U.S. large-cap stocks and significant exposure to technology, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the tech sector, as well as a stable U.S. economy. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-oriented sectors like technology, and potential regulatory changes affecting major holdings such as Tesla and Alphabet. Diversification across sectors like industrials and financials provides some balance, but overall performance remains tied to U.S. market conditions.
GRNY Top 10 Holdings
GRNY leans heavily into U.S. large caps with a clear tilt toward semiconductors and financials, giving the fund a tech-and-banks backbone. AMD and KLA have been key engines, with AMD’s rally in data center chips and KLA’s chip-equipment strength helping drive returns, even if KLA has cooled a bit lately. Arista Networks adds more AI-fueled momentum on the networking side. On the financial front, JPMorgan and Bank of New York Mellon are steadily rising, supporting the fund, while Robinhood’s more mixed, recently lagging performance has been a mild drag.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arista Networks | 2.92% | $124.53M | $227.10B | 53.63% | 83 Outperform | |
| GE Aerospace | 2.76% | $117.80M | $373.60B | 33.56% | 72 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.66% | $113.76M | $942.63B | 19.84% | 72 Outperform | |
| Packaging | 2.66% | $113.66M | $21.90B | 30.04% | 76 Outperform | |
| PNC Financial | 2.63% | $112.33M | $99.70B | 33.14% | 71 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.61% | $111.52M | $1.08T | 45.82% | 72 Outperform | |
| Robinhood | 2.61% | $111.43M | $77.87B | -15.07% | 68 Neutral | |
| Bank of New York Mellon | 2.59% | $110.62M | $107.30B | 54.03% | 75 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 2.54% | $108.71M | $3.45T | -8.96% | 79 Outperform | |
| Monster Beverage | 2.52% | $107.60M | $94.26B | 55.01% | 80 Outperform |
GRNY Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
27.35
Positive
26.50
Positive
25.79
Positive
Market Momentum
0.05
Negative
56.02
Neutral
84.06
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GRNY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.38, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.79, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.05 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.02 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 84.06 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GRNY.
GRNY Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
27.72
3.94
16.57%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
―
―
―
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
―
―
―
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents