Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GEND - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as JPMorgan Chase and CVS Health, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across ten sectors, including Health Care, Financials, and Energy, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.38%, the fund offers relatively low costs compared to actively managed ETFs.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
The ETF has over 96% exposure to U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some holdings, like M&T Bank, have shown weak year-to-date performance, potentially dragging on overall returns.
Small Asset Base
With assets under management of just over $2.8 million, the fund may face liquidity challenges compared to larger ETFs.
GEND vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM27.71M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.38%
Beta0.64
IssuerGenter Capital
Inception DateJan 13, 2025
Dividend Yield2.06%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume40,868
30 Day Avg. Volume48,823
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
13.09Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering34
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GEND Summary
The Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is designed for investors who want steady income through dividends. It focuses on companies with a strong history of paying high dividends across various industries, such as healthcare, financials, and energy. Some well-known companies in this ETF include Altria Group and Cisco Systems. This ETF is a good choice for those looking to diversify their portfolio while earning consistent income. However, new investors should be aware that its performance can fluctuate with the market, and it relies heavily on dividend-paying companies, which may face challenges during economic downturns.
How much will it cost me?The Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) has an expense ratio of 0.38%, which means you’ll pay $3.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting dividend-rich stocks rather than tracking a passive index. The higher cost reflects the additional research and management involved in curating its portfolio.
What would affect this ETF?The Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) could benefit from stable economic conditions and low interest rates, which often support dividend-paying stocks, particularly in sectors like Health Care and Financials that make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, rising interest rates or economic uncertainty could negatively impact dividend-focused investments, as companies may face challenges maintaining payouts. Additionally, sector-specific risks, such as regulatory changes in Health Care or volatility in Energy prices, could influence the ETF's performance.
GEND Top 10 Holdings
The Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) leans heavily on U.S.-based dividend powerhouses, with a notable tilt toward financials, healthcare, and energy. Rising stars like Capital One Financial and Northern Trust are driving performance, thanks to strong financial results and positive momentum. Meanwhile, Enbridge and Altria are lagging, weighed down by financial challenges and sector-specific headwinds. The fund’s focus on high-yielding, stable names offers a steady income stream, but its sector concentration in financials and energy could make it vulnerable to economic shifts. Overall, GEND balances resilience with pockets of volatility.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northern | 4.44% | $1.23M | $27.30B | 45.14% | 78 Outperform | |
| Cisco Systems | 4.19% | $1.16M | $292.22B | 25.91% | 77 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 4.15% | $1.15M | $896.14B | 37.49% | 72 Outperform | |
| M&T Bank | 4.09% | $1.14M | $32.83B | 13.77% | 76 Outperform | |
| Enbridge | 3.82% | $1.06M | $98.67B | 4.16% | 69 Neutral | |
| CVS Health | 3.80% | $1.06M | $101.94B | 67.88% | 64 Neutral | |
| Altria Group | 3.60% | $1.00M | $93.84B | 9.89% | 64 Neutral | |
| Capital One Financial | 3.58% | $996.05K | $158.42B | 45.86% | 71 Outperform | |
| Chevron | 3.43% | $953.69K | $320.65B | 3.99% | 71 Outperform | |
| Emerson Electric Company | 3.42% | $949.99K | $80.81B | 21.97% | 76 Outperform |
GEND Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
11.41
Positive
11.31
Positive
10.81
Positive
Market Momentum
0.09
Negative
61.55
Neutral
89.31
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GEND, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 11.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 11.41, and equal to the 200-day MA of 10.81, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.09 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.55 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.31 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GEND.
GEND Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GEND
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
11.78
1.85
18.63%
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
―
―
―
DIVY
Sound Equity Income ETF
―
―
―
VUS
Virtus US Dividend ETF
―
―
―
PAYR
Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF
―
―
―
JHDV
John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents