Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GCAD - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD)
Rating:56Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains over the year to date and in recent months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Leading Aerospace & Defense Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including well-known aerospace and defense companies, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
No Stated Expense Ratio
The fund currently shows a zero expense ratio, which means investors are not seeing returns reduced by ongoing management fees based on the provided data.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
With most assets in industrials tied to commercial aerospace and defense, the fund is highly exposed to downturns in this single industry.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is overwhelmingly invested in U.S. companies, offering very little exposure to other regions.
Small Asset Base
The relatively low assets under management mean the fund is still small, which can sometimes lead to higher trading costs or a greater risk of closure.
GCAD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM24.38M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.00%
Beta0.92
IssuerGabelli
Inception DateN/A
Dividend Yield1.84%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume4,295
30 Day Avg. Volume2,515
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
54.91Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusHold
Number of Analyst Covering36
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GCAD Summary
GCAD is the Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF, focused on companies in the aerospace and defense industry rather than tracking a broad market index. It mainly holds U.S. industrial stocks tied to aircraft, defense systems, and related technology. Well-known holdings include Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Someone might invest in GCAD to seek growth from rising air travel, defense spending, and advances in aerospace technology, while still getting diversification across many companies in this niche. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in the aerospace and defense sector, so it can rise or fall sharply with that industry.
How much will it cost me?The Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) has an expense ratio of 0.0%, meaning you won’t pay anything in fees annually for every $1,000 invested. This is significantly lower than average because it has no management fees, which is uncommon for ETFs, whether actively or passively managed.
What would affect this ETF?The Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) could benefit from increased global defense spending, advancements in aerospace technology, and growing interest in space exploration, which align with its focus on leading companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin. However, potential risks include budget cuts in defense spending, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact the Industrials sector and its top holdings. The ETF’s strong exposure to U.S.-based companies makes it sensitive to domestic policy and economic conditions.
GCAD Top 10 Holdings
GCAD is a pure play on U.S. aerospace and defense, with the fund’s story driven by a tight cluster of industrial heavyweights. Lockheed Martin and Honeywell are the steady engines, rising on solid backlogs and dependable cash flows. Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems add more drama, with improving momentum but still weighed down by financial and operational baggage, occasionally jolting the ride. On the brighter side, names like Moog, Hexcel, and Curtiss-Wright are climbing nicely, helping offset the lag from more troubled defense contractors and keeping this niche, sector-focused ETF firmly tied to the runway.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin | 7.20% | $962.48K | $145.92B | 39.26% | 70 Outperform | |
| Hexcel | 4.94% | $660.23K | $6.59B | 27.99% | 73 Outperform | |
| Mercury Systems | 4.83% | $645.67K | $5.64B | 123.58% | 57 Neutral | |
| Boeing | 4.10% | $547.78K | $183.02B | 32.89% | 54 Neutral | |
| Honeywell International | 4.04% | $540.56K | $144.45B | 2.30% | 77 Outperform | |
| Moog | 3.81% | $510.04K | $10.21B | 68.61% | 73 Outperform | |
| Ducommun | 3.78% | $506.03K | $1.69B | 66.35% | 58 Neutral | |
| Howmet Aerospace | 3.69% | $493.71K | $83.66B | 64.65% | 67 Neutral | |
| Spirit AeroSystems | 3.48% | $465.21K | ― | ― | 51 Neutral | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 3.39% | $453.90K | $24.22B | 90.37% | 74 Outperform |
GCAD Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
47.87
Positive
46.02
Positive
42.82
Positive
Market Momentum
1.29
Positive
60.69
Neutral
25.45
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GCAD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 47.87, and equal to the 200-day MA of 42.82, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.29 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 60.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 25.45 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GCAD.
GCAD Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GCAD
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF
51.92
16.69
47.37%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
LFSC
F/M Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF
―
―
―
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
―
―
―
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
―
―
―
HVAC
AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents