tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GCAD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GCAD

Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
GCAD, the Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because of strong core holdings like Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, Textron, and Moog, which show healthy financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and supportive long-term growth drivers in aerospace and defense. However, weaker names such as Boeing, Albany International, and Ducommun, which face profitability pressures, bearish trading signals, or operational challenges, weigh on the fund’s score. The main risk factor is the ETF’s concentration in the aerospace and defense industry, which makes it sensitive to sector-specific issues like government spending, supply chain disruptions, and program delays.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing positive momentum for investors.
Leading Aerospace & Defense Holdings
Many of the top positions, including well-known defense and aerospace companies, have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
No Stated Expense Ratio
With a reported expense ratio of 0.0, investors currently are not seeing returns reduced by ongoing management fees.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
More than four-fifths of the fund is in industrials, so it is highly sensitive to swings in the aerospace and defense industry.
Short-Term Performance Bumpiness
The ETF has recently experienced a weak three-month stretch despite a stronger one-month rebound, which may signal near-term volatility.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With the vast majority of holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little exposure to other regions’ markets.

GCAD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GCAD Summary

GCAD is the Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF, focused on companies tied to airplanes, space, and military equipment rather than tracking a broad market index. It mainly holds U.S. industrial stocks, including well-known names like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, plus other firms that make aircraft parts, defense systems, and related technology. An investor might consider GCAD if they want targeted exposure to the long-term growth of air travel, global defense spending, and aerospace innovation instead of a general stock fund. A key risk is that it’s heavily concentrated in the aerospace and defense sector, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) has an expense ratio of 0.0%, meaning you won’t pay anything in fees annually for every $1,000 invested. This is significantly lower than average because it has no management fees, which is uncommon for ETFs, whether actively or passively managed.
What would affect this ETF?The Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) could benefit from increased global defense spending, advancements in aerospace technology, and growing interest in space exploration, which align with its focus on leading companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin. However, potential risks include budget cuts in defense spending, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact the Industrials sector and its top holdings. The ETF’s strong exposure to U.S.-based companies makes it sensitive to domestic policy and economic conditions.

GCAD Top 10 Holdings

GCAD is a pure play on U.S. aerospace and defense, with performance driven by a tight cluster of industrial heavyweights. Moog and Hexcel have been the fund’s quiet engines, rising steadily on strong aerospace demand, while Ducommun has shifted from under-the-radar to standout, adding some extra lift. On the flip side, defense giants like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman have been lagging lately, acting as a bit of a brake. Boeing’s story is mixed, keeping volatility in the cockpit but also offering rebound potential if execution improves.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Boeing6.66%$1.87M$174.45B18.68%
54
Neutral
Albany International6.59%$1.85M$1.62B-10.40%
56
Neutral
Moog5.46%$1.53M$9.72B72.95%
73
Outperform
Hexcel5.12%$1.44M$6.84B80.94%
73
Outperform
Lockheed Martin4.91%$1.38M$119.47B9.88%
70
Outperform
Northrop Grumman4.85%$1.36M$80.53B14.93%
76
Outperform
Textron4.68%$1.32M$15.81B29.01%
75
Outperform
Ducommun4.37%$1.23M$2.05B134.00%
58
Neutral
Honeywell International3.91%$1.10M$132.81B-2.18%
77
Outperform
L3Harris Technologies3.34%$938.58K$57.49B41.17%
70
Neutral

GCAD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
52.24
Negative
100DMA
51.23
Negative
200DMA
47.35
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.45
Positive
RSI
42.62
Neutral
STOCH
34.56
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GCAD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.95, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.24, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.35, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.45 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.62 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 34.56 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GCAD.

GCAD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$27.88M
67
Neutral
$93.82M0.85%
65
Neutral
$93.09M1.06%
72
Outperform
$56.25M0.32%
65
Neutral
$51.81M0.35%
69
Neutral
$9.76M1.00%
70
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GCAD
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF
50.30
14.94
42.25%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
PSR
Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund
HVAC
AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement