FTWO - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the year so far, with especially strong results in the last three months.
Many Top Holdings Are Performing Well
Most of the largest positions, including major industrial, energy, and materials companies, have delivered strong or steady returns, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Diversified Across Cyclical Sectors
Holdings spread across industrials, materials, and energy provide exposure to different parts of the real economy rather than relying on a single industry.
Negative Factors
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is higher than many broad market ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns for buy-and-hold investors.
Sector Concentration Risk
Heavy weighting in just a few cyclical sectors means the ETF could be hit hard if those areas of the market weaken.
Underperforming Top Holding
One of the largest positions has shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund given its sizable weight.
FTWO vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM83.08M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.86
IssuerStrive
Inception DateAug 31, 2023
Dividend Yield0.5%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume10,586
30 Day Avg. Volume19,781
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
55.35Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering52
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FTWO Summary
The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO) is an exchange-traded fund that follows the Bloomberg FAANG 2.0 Select Index, focusing on companies tied to the next wave of innovation, especially in areas like industrial technology, energy, and materials. Instead of classic internet giants, it holds firms helping power and build the real economy, such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron in energy, and Deere in advanced farming equipment. Someone might invest for growth and diversification across several sectors in the U.S. and Canada. A key risk is that it can rise or fall sharply with swings in industrial, energy, and materials stocks.
How much will it cost me?The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF (FTWO) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a dynamic portfolio of emerging and established tech leaders. Active management typically involves higher costs due to the research and adjustments made by fund managers.
What would affect this ETF?The Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF could benefit from continued advancements in technology sectors like cloud computing and artificial intelligence, as well as strong performance from its top holdings in energy and industrials, such as Exxon Mobil and Deere. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused investments, and potential regulatory changes in North America that could affect key industries like energy and materials. Economic slowdowns or reduced demand for industrial and energy products could also pose risks to its performance.
FTWO Top 10 Holdings
FTWO may wear a tech-themed label, but its story is really about old-economy powerhouses. Energy giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron have been rising and now act as key engines for the fund, while industrial names like Deere and GE Aerospace have turned more mixed to lagging, occasionally putting sand in the gears. Gold and uranium players such as Newmont and Cameco have also been choppy, adding volatility rather than clear direction. Overall, this is a North America–focused ETF concentrated in industrials, energy, and materials, not classic Silicon Valley growth.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deere | 9.82% | $8.15M | $155.75B | 34.64% | 66 Neutral | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 8.59% | $7.14M | $106.78B | 49.30% | 68 Neutral | |
| Exxon Mobil | 7.38% | $6.13M | $620.89B | 40.18% | 74 Outperform | |
| Cameco | 4.88% | $4.06M | C$71.31B | 212.09% | 71 Outperform | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.39% | $3.65M | $328.00B | 70.23% | 72 Outperform | |
| Chevron | 4.15% | $3.45M | $368.97B | 37.03% | 71 Outperform | |
| Newmont Mining | 3.92% | $3.26M | $122.08B | 108.00% | 81 Outperform | |
| RTX | 3.74% | $3.11M | $267.03B | 55.24% | 74 Outperform | |
| Corteva | 3.62% | $3.01M | $54.59B | 35.81% | 75 Outperform | |
| Agnico Eagle | 3.41% | $2.83M | $107.57B | 75.26% | 80 Outperform |
FTWO Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
46.59
Negative
44.27
Positive
41.10
Positive
Market Momentum
0.16
Negative
51.51
Neutral
39.05
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FTWO, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 46.09, equal to the 50-day MA of 46.59, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.10, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.16 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 51.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 39.05 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FTWO.
FTWO Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FTWO
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF
46.47
17.00
57.69%
KLMN
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF
―
―
―
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
―
―
―
YALL
God Bless America ETF
―
―
―
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
―
―
―
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents