CCFE - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE)
Rating:62Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently been working for investors.
Several Strong-Performing Holdings
A number of the top positions, such as Wesco International, Green Brick Partners, and Advance Auto Parts, have shown strong gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Focused Yet Multi-Sector Exposure
While the fund is concentrated in a few areas, it still spreads investments across industrials, consumer cyclical, consumer defensive, health care, and energy, offering some diversification across different parts of the economy.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Concentrated Sector Bets
Heavy exposure to industrials and consumer cyclical stocks means the ETF could be hit hard if economically sensitive sectors weaken.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions, including Cooper-Standard Holdings, Lithia Motors, Comstock Resources, and Tenet Healthcare, have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.
CCFE vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM33.97M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.95%
Beta1.30
IssuerConcourse
Inception DateJun 12, 2025
Dividend Yield0.02%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume5,165
30 Day Avg. Volume1,696
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
35.13Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering22
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CCFE Summary
The Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) is an actively managed fund that invests mainly in U.S. and Canadian companies, with no specific index, but a theme of finding undervalued stocks with room to grow. It focuses on industrial and consumer-related businesses, holding names like Lithia Motors and VF Corporation. Someone might consider this ETF if they want a concentrated, stock-picking approach in North America that aims for both value and growth. A key risk is that the fund is focused in a relatively small number of stocks and sectors, so its price can swing more than a broad market fund.
How much will it cost me?The Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) has an expense ratio of 0.95%, which means you’ll pay $9.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF (CCFE) could benefit from strong consumer spending and industrial growth in North America, as these sectors make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact consumer cyclical and industrial stocks, which are sensitive to borrowing costs and demand fluctuations. Regulatory changes or healthcare sector challenges may also affect the ETF's performance due to its exposure to health care companies.
CCFE Top 10 Holdings
CCFE is leaning heavily into North American industrials and consumer cyclicals, so names like Wesco International and ArcBest are doing much of the heavy lifting when they’re rising, helping offset bumps elsewhere. On the flip side, Cooper-Standard, Lithia Motors, and Columbus McKinnon have been lagging, acting more like anchors than engines for the fund lately. Consumer-facing plays such as Premium Brands and VF Corp are also under pressure, so the ETF’s story right now is a concentrated bet on economically sensitive, industrial-style recovery that hasn’t fully kicked into gear yet.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper-Standard Holdings | 11.58% | $4.10M | $511.47M | 93.98% | 56 Neutral | |
| Premium Brands | 7.36% | $2.61M | C$4.33B | 5.63% | 69 Neutral | |
| Wesco International | 7.01% | $2.48M | $13.75B | 73.94% | 75 Outperform | |
| Advance Auto Parts | 6.79% | $2.40M | $3.27B | 38.35% | 48 Neutral | |
| Comstock Resources | 6.01% | $2.13M | $5.65B | -10.52% | 59 Neutral | |
| Lithia Motors | 5.95% | $2.11M | $5.86B | -18.06% | 76 Outperform | |
| Columbus Mckinnon | 5.50% | $1.95M | $411.84M | -16.20% | 72 Outperform | |
| ArcBest | 4.98% | $1.76M | $2.22B | 36.84% | 66 Neutral | |
| VF | 4.71% | $1.67M | $6.62B | 3.23% | 60 Neutral | |
| Tenet Healthcare | 4.33% | $1.53M | $16.55B | 38.70% | 74 Outperform |
CCFE Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
28.26
Negative
27.57
Negative
27.02
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.79
Negative
39.54
Neutral
29.46
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CCFE, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.27, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.26, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.02, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.79 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 39.54 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.46 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for CCFE.
CCFE Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
25.70
1.72
7.17%
CGCV
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
―
―
―
SEPI
Shelton Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
YALL
God Bless America ETF
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents