Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
FSST - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, including Nvidia, Alphabet, and Netflix, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, driving the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors like Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Health Care, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has shown healthy growth this year, reflecting its ability to capitalize on favorable market trends.
Negative Factors
High Technology Exposure
With nearly 29% of the portfolio in Technology, the fund is heavily reliant on the performance of this sector.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The ETF is overwhelmingly focused on U.S. companies, offering minimal exposure to international markets.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost ETFs, which could eat into long-term returns.
FSST vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM13.13M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta1.04
IssuerFidelity
Inception DateJun 15, 2021
Dividend Yield1.55%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume0
30 Day Avg. Volume5,691
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.06Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering86
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FSST Summary
The Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) is a fund that invests in U.S. companies with strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. It includes a mix of well-known companies like Nvidia and Microsoft, along with others across sectors such as technology, healthcare, and finance. This ETF is ideal for investors looking to diversify their portfolio while supporting sustainable and ethical business practices. However, since it focuses heavily on tech stocks, its performance can be more volatile and tied to the ups and downs of the technology sector.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed and focuses on sustainability criteria, which require more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds. It’s a good option if you value ethical investing and don’t mind paying a bit more for it.
What would affect this ETF?FSST's focus on U.S. equities with strong ESG practices positions it well to benefit from increasing demand for sustainable investing and growth in sectors like technology and health care, which are heavily weighted in the fund. However, its reliance on top holdings such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple could make it vulnerable to market volatility in the tech sector or broader economic downturns. Additionally, changes in ESG regulations or shifts in consumer sentiment toward sustainability could positively or negatively impact the fund's performance.
FSST Top 10 Holdings
The Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) leans heavily on tech giants like Nvidia and Apple, which are driving the fund’s performance with steady growth and strategic focus on AI and services. Alphabet is another standout, rising on strong investments in cloud and AI. However, Microsoft and Meta have been lagging recently, with bearish momentum and valuation concerns holding them back. The fund’s tech-heavy positioning, making up nearly a third of its portfolio, underscores its reliance on innovation-driven names, while Eli Lilly adds a dose of strength from the healthcare sector. Overall, FSST is firmly rooted in U.S. equities with a clear tilt toward sustainability-focused leaders.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 9.42% | $1.23M | $4.43T | 37.37% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 6.91% | $900.87K | $4.12T | 12.16% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 6.47% | $844.03K | $3.59T | 10.76% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 5.23% | $682.17K | $3.88T | 69.42% | 85 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 5.07% | $661.59K | $2.45T | 0.82% | 71 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.63% | $342.56K | $955.13B | 24.76% | 72 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.38% | $310.50K | $857.62B | 29.79% | 72 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 2.18% | $284.63K | $1.70T | 7.67% | 76 Outperform | |
| TSMC | 1.94% | $252.66K | $1.22T | 57.27% | 81 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 1.66% | $216.38K | $489.87B | 2.16% | 75 Outperform |
FSST Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
30.55
Positive
29.86
Positive
27.78
Positive
Market Momentum
0.09
Positive
57.66
Neutral
<0.01
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FSST, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.88, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.55, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.78, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 57.66 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of <0.01 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FSST.
FSST Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FSST
Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF
30.88
3.21
11.60%
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
―
―
―
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
STOX
Horizon Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents